Literature DB >> 25517481

Lifesource XL-18 pedometer for measuring steps under controlled and free-living conditions.

Sam Liu1, Dina Brooks, Scott Thomas, Gunther Eysenbach, Robert Peter Nolan.   

Abstract

The primary aim was to examine the criterion and construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Lifesource XL-18 pedometer (A&D Medical, Toronto, ON, Canada) for measuring steps under controlled and free-living activities. The influence of body mass index, waist size and walking speed on the criterion validity of XL-18 was also explored. Forty adults (35-74 years) performed a 6-min walk test in the controlled condition, and the criterion validity of XL-18 was assessed by comparing it to steps counted manually. Thirty-five adults participated in the free-living condition and the construct validity of XL-18 was assessed by comparing it to Yamax SW-200 (YAMAX Health & Sports, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA). During the controlled condition, XL-18 did not significantly differ from criterion (P > 0.05) and no systematic error was found using Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy of XL-18 decreased with slower walking speed (P = 0.001). During the free-living condition, Bland-Altman analysis revealed that XL-18 overestimated daily steps by 327 ± 118 than Yamax (P = 0.004). However, the absolute percent error (APE) (6.5 ± 0.58%) was still within an acceptable range. XL-18 did not differ statistically between pant pockets. XL-18 is suitable for measuring steps in controlled and free-living conditions. However, caution may be required when interpreting the steps recorded under slower speeds and free-living conditions.

Keywords:  accuracy; activity monitor; pedometer; physical activity; step counter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25517481     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart® HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.

Authors:  Frederik Rose Svarre; Mads Møller Jensen; Josephine Nielsen; Morten Villumsen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Comparison between Mother, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, and a hand tally for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.

Authors:  Henrik Riel; Camilla Rams Rathleff; Pernille Møller Kalstrup; Niels Kragh Madsen; Elena Selmar Pedersen; Louise Bilenberg Pape-Haugaard; Morten Villumsen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Validity of Consumer Activity Monitors and an Algorithm Using Smartphone Data for Measuring Steps during Different Activity Types.

Authors:  Verena Hartung; Mustafa Sarshar; Viktoria Karle; Layal Shammas; Asarnusch Rashid; Paul Roullier; Caroline Eilers; Mathias Mäurer; Peter Flachenecker; Klaus Pfeifer; Alexander Tallner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marco Giurgiu; Irina Timm; Marlissa Becker; Steffen Schmidt; Kathrin Wunsch; Rebecca Nissen; Denis Davidovski; Johannes B J Bussmann; Claudio R Nigg; Markus Reichert; Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer; Alexander Woll; Birte von Haaren-Mack
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.947

5.  Walking as a Contributor to Physical Activity in Healthy Older Adults: 2 Week Longitudinal Study Using Accelerometry and the Doubly Labeled Water Method.

Authors:  Giulio Valenti; Alberto G Bonomi; Klaas R Westerterp
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.