Literature DB >> 25516947

Justice and the NICE approach.

Richard Cookson.   

Abstract

When thinking about population level healthcare priority setting decisions, such as those made by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, good medical ethics requires attention to three main principles of health justice: (1) cost-effectiveness, an aspect of beneficence, (2) non-discrimination, and (3) priority to the worse off in terms of both current severity of illness and lifetime health. Applying these principles requires consideration of the identified patients who benefit from decisions and the unidentified patients who bear the opportunity costs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocation of Health Care Resources; Distributive Justice; Ethics; Health Care Economics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25516947     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  Can Clinical Guidelines Afford to Ignore Cost Effectiveness? An Ethical Perspective.

Authors:  Kenneth Boyd; Peter Hall
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Public Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation: Principles of Distributive Justice.

Authors:  Carina Oedingen; Tim Bartling; Axel C Mühlbacher; Harald Schrem; Christian Krauth
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Address Health Equity Concerns.

Authors:  Richard Cookson; Andrew J Mirelman; Susan Griffin; Miqdad Asaria; Bryony Dawkins; Ole Frithjof Norheim; Stéphane Verguet; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Health, priority to the worse off, and time.

Authors:  Anders Herlitz
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-12

5.  Caring for Carers: Positive and Normative Challenges for Future Research on Carer Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; Jeff Round
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  A flexible formula for incorporating distributive concerns into cost-effectiveness analyses: Priority weights.

Authors:  Øystein Ariansen Haaland; Frode Lindemark; Kjell Arne Johansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health and the use of healthcare services in Catalonia: analysis of the individual data of 7.5 million residents.

Authors:  Anna García-Altés; Dolores Ruiz-Muñoz; Cristina Colls; Montse Mias; Nicolau Martín Bassols
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Factors that influence rheumatologists' anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha prescribing decisions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sean P Gavan; Gavin Daker-White; Katherine Payne; Anne Barton
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2019-12-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.