Bridgette E Garrett1, Shanta R Dube2, Stephen Babb3, Tim McAfee3. 1. Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; bgarrett@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. 3. Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA;
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive tobacco prevention and control efforts that include implementing smoke-free air laws, increasing tobacco prices, conducting hard-hitting mass media campaigns, and making evidence-based cessation treatments available are effective in reducing tobacco use in the general population. However, if these interventions are not implemented in an equitable manner, certain population groups may be left out causing or exacerbating disparities in tobacco use. Disparities in tobacco use have, in part, stemmed from inequities in the way tobacco control policies and programs have been adopted and implemented to reach and impact the most vulnerable segments of the population that have the highest rates of smokings (e.g., those with lower education and incomes). METHODS: Education and income are the 2 main social determinants of health that negatively impact health. However, there are other social determinants of health that must be considered for tobacco control policies to be effective in reducing tobacco-related disparities. This article will provide an overview of how tobacco control policies and programs can address key social determinants of health in order to achieve equity and eliminate disparities in tobacco prevention and control. RESULTS: Tobacco control policy interventions can be effective in addressing the social determinants of health in tobacco prevention and control to achieve equity and eliminate tobacco-related disparities when they are implemented consistently and equitably across all population groups. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a social determinants of health approach in tobacco prevention and control will be necessary to achieve equity and eliminate tobacco-related disparities.
INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive tobacco prevention and control efforts that include implementing smoke-free air laws, increasing tobacco prices, conducting hard-hitting mass media campaigns, and making evidence-based cessation treatments available are effective in reducing tobacco use in the general population. However, if these interventions are not implemented in an equitable manner, certain population groups may be left out causing or exacerbating disparities in tobacco use. Disparities in tobacco use have, in part, stemmed from inequities in the way tobacco control policies and programs have been adopted and implemented to reach and impact the most vulnerable segments of the population that have the highest rates of smokings (e.g., those with lower education and incomes). METHODS: Education and income are the 2 main social determinants of health that negatively impact health. However, there are other social determinants of health that must be considered for tobacco control policies to be effective in reducing tobacco-related disparities. This article will provide an overview of how tobacco control policies and programs can address key social determinants of health in order to achieve equity and eliminate disparities in tobacco prevention and control. RESULTS:Tobacco control policy interventions can be effective in addressing the social determinants of health in tobacco prevention and control to achieve equity and eliminate tobacco-related disparities when they are implemented consistently and equitably across all population groups. CONCLUSIONS: Taking a social determinants of health approach in tobacco prevention and control will be necessary to achieve equity and eliminate tobacco-related disparities.
Authors: Barbara A Pizacani; Julie E Maher; Kristen Rohde; Linda Drach; Michael J Stark Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Kristopher L Arheart; David J Lee; Noella A Dietz; James D Wilkinson; John D Clark; William G LeBlanc; Berrin Serdar; Lora E Fleming Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Joseph G L Lee; Lisa Henriksen; Shyanika W Rose; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Kurt M Ribisl Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kelly C Young-Wolff; Sara R Adams; Daniella Klebaner; Alyce S Adams; Cynthia I Campbell; Derek D Satre; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Med Care Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Vani Nath Simmons; Barbara Pineiro; Monica Webb Hooper; Jhanelle E Gray; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Judith J Prochaska; Emily F Gates; Kevin C Davis; Karen Gutierrez; Yvonne Prutzman; Robert Rodes Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Michael S Amato; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Brittany Carnegie; Zeinab Safi; Adam F Benson; Lauren Czaplicki; Randall Simpson; Yitong Zhou; Maham Akbar; Stacey Younger Gagosian; Julia Cen Chen-Sankey; Barbara A Schillo Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2020-01