OBJECTIVE: Functional connectivity (FC) among language regions is decreased in adults with epilepsy compared to controls, but less is known about FC in children with epilepsy. We sought to determine if language FC is reduced in pediatric epilepsy, and examined clinical factors that associate with language FC in this population. METHODS: We assessed FC during an age-adjusted language task in children with left-hemisphere focal epilepsy (n = 19) compared to controls (n = 19). Time series data were extracted for three left regions of interest (ROIS) and their right homologues: inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and Wernicke's area (WA) using SPM8. Associations between FC and factors such as cognitive performance, language dominance, and epilepsy duration were assessed. RESULTS: Children with epilepsy showed decreased interhemispheric connectivity compared to controls, particularly between core left language regions (IFG, WA) and their right hemisphere homologues, as well as decreased intrahemispheric right frontal FC. Increased intrahemispheric FC between left IFG and left WA was a positive predictor of language skills overall, and naming ability in particular. FC of language areas was not affected by language dominance, as the effects remained only when examining participants with left language dominance. Overall FC did not differ according to duration of epilepsy or age of onset. SIGNIFICANCE: FC during a language task is reduced in children, similar to findings in adults. In specific, children with left focal epilepsy demonstrated decreased interhemispheric FC in temporal and frontal language connections and decreased intrahemispheric right frontal FC. These differences were present near the onset of epilepsy. Greater FC between left language centers is related to better language ability. Our results highlight that connectivity of language areas has a developmental pattern and is related to cognitive ability. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Functional connectivity (FC) among language regions is decreased in adults with epilepsy compared to controls, but less is known about FC in children with epilepsy. We sought to determine if language FC is reduced in pediatric epilepsy, and examined clinical factors that associate with language FC in this population. METHODS: We assessed FC during an age-adjusted language task in children with left-hemisphere focal epilepsy (n = 19) compared to controls (n = 19). Time series data were extracted for three left regions of interest (ROIS) and their right homologues: inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and Wernicke's area (WA) using SPM8. Associations between FC and factors such as cognitive performance, language dominance, and epilepsy duration were assessed. RESULTS:Children with epilepsy showed decreased interhemispheric connectivity compared to controls, particularly between core left language regions (IFG, WA) and their right hemisphere homologues, as well as decreased intrahemispheric right frontal FC. Increased intrahemispheric FC between left IFG and left WA was a positive predictor of language skills overall, and naming ability in particular. FC of language areas was not affected by language dominance, as the effects remained only when examining participants with left language dominance. Overall FC did not differ according to duration of epilepsy or age of onset. SIGNIFICANCE: FC during a language task is reduced in children, similar to findings in adults. In specific, children with left focal epilepsy demonstrated decreased interhemispheric FC in temporal and frontal language connections and decreased intrahemispheric right frontal FC. These differences were present near the onset of epilepsy. Greater FC between left language centers is related to better language ability. Our results highlight that connectivity of language areas has a developmental pattern and is related to cognitive ability. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Tali Bitan; Douglas D Burman; Dong Lu; Nadia E Cone; Darren R Gitelman; M-Marsel Mesulam; James R Booth Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jonathan D Power; Kelly A Barnes; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gemma B Northam; Frédérique Liégeois; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Louise J Croft; Paul N Johns; Wui K Chong; John S Wyatt; Torsten Baldeweg Journal: Brain Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Daniela Perani; Maria C Saccuman; Paola Scifo; Alfred Anwander; Alfred Awander; Danilo Spada; Cristina Baldoli; Antonella Poloniato; Gabriele Lohmann; Angela D Friederici Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Mbwana; M M Berl; E K Ritzl; L Rosenberger; J Mayo; S Weinstein; J A Conry; P L Pearl; S Shamim; E N Moore; S Sato; L G Vezina; W H Theodore; W D Gaillard Journal: Brain Date: 2008-12-05 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Edwin van Dellen; Linda Douw; Johannes C Baayen; Jan J Heimans; Sophie C Ponten; W Peter Vandertop; Demetrios N Velis; Cornelis J Stam; Jaap C Reijneveld Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Madison M Berl; Virginia Terwilliger; Alexandra Scheller; Leigh Sepeta; Jenifer Walkowiak; William D Gaillard Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Madeline Marcelle; Xiaozhen You; Eleanor J Fanto; Leigh N Sepeta; William Davis Gaillard; Madison M Berl Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2022-08-17 Impact factor: 6.740
Authors: Camille Garcia-Ramos; Jack J Lin; Leonardo Bonilha; Jana E Jones; Daren C Jackson; Vivek Prabhakaran; Bruce P Hermann Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2016-10-23 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Elaine Foley; Amanda G Wood; Paul L Furlong; A Richard Walsh; Shauna Kearney; Peter Bill; Arjan Hillebrand; Stefano Seri Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Lisa Bartha-Doering; Kathrin Kollndorfer; Gregor Kasprian; Astrid Novak; Anna-Lisa Schuler; Florian Ph S Fischmeister; Johanna Alexopoulos; William Davis Gaillard; Daniela Prayer; Rainer Seidl; Madison M Berl Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 2.708