Literature DB >> 25516397

Differences in physicochemical properties to consider in the design, evaluation and choice between microparticles and nanoparticles for drug delivery.

Daniel P Otto1, Anja Otto, Melgardt M de Villiers.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The increase in the development of novel nanoparticle drug delivery systems makes the choice between micro- and nanoscale drug delivery systems ubiquitous. Changes in physical and chemical properties between micro- to nanosized particles give them different properties that influence their physiological, anatomical and clinical behavior and therefore potential application. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the effect changes in the surface-to-volume ratio have on the thermal properties, solubility, dissolution and crystallization of micro- versus nanosized drug delivery systems. With these changes in the physicochemical properties in mind, the review covers computational and biophysical approaches to the design and evaluation of micro- and nanodelivery systems. The emphasis of the review is on the effect these properties have on clinical performance in terms of drug release, tissue retention, biodistribution, efficacy, toxicity and therefore choice of delivery system. EXPERT OPINION: Ultimately, the choice between micro- and nanometer-sized delivery systems is not straightforward. However, if the fundamental differences in physical and chemical properties are considered, it can be much easier to make a rational choice of the appropriate drug delivery system size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery; drug; micrometer; nanometer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516397     DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2015.988135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1742-5247            Impact factor:   6.648


  8 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage-based cell therapies: The long and winding road.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Saul Kivimäe; Aaron Dolor; Francis C Szoka
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 9.776

2.  Synergetic Enhancement of Tumor Double-Targeted MRI Nano-Probe.

Authors:  Nikita Yabbarov; Elena Nikolskaya; Maria Sokol; Mariia Mollaeva; Margarita Chirkina; Irina Seregina; Mikhail Gulyaev; Yury Pirogov; Rem Petrov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Assessment of the Effect of PLGA Co-polymers and PEG on the Formation and Characteristics of PLGA-PEG-PLGA Co-block Polymer Using Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Teuku Nanda Saifullah Sulaiman; Dwi Larasati; Akhmad Kharis Nugroho; Syaiful Choiri
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2019-08-01

4.  Erythrocyte Membrane-Coated Arsenic Trioxide-Loaded Sodium Alginate Nanoparticles for Tumor Therapy.

Authors:  Yumei Lian; Xuerui Wang; Pengcheng Guo; Yichen Li; Faisal Raza; Jing Su; Mingfeng Qiu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 5.  Application of Sol-Gels for Treatment of Gynaecological Conditions-Physiological Perspectives and Emerging Concepts in Intravaginal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ritu Thapa; Shila Gurung; Marie-Odile Parat; Harendra S Parekh; Preeti Pandey
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  Preparation and characterization of erythrocyte membrane cloaked PLGA/arsenic trioxide nanoparticles and evaluation of their in vitro anti-tumor effect.

Authors:  Jing Su; Geyi Liu; Yumei Lian; Zul Kamal; Xiao Que; Yujiao Qiu; Mingfeng Qiu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Effects of pore size on in vitro and in vivo anticancer efficacies of mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jie Li; Suqin Shen; Fei Kong; Ting Jiang; Cui Tang; Chunhua Yin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  How Long Do Implanted Triclosan Sutures Inhibit Staphylococcus aureus in Surgical Conditions? A Pharmacological Model.

Authors:  Frederic Christopher Daoud; Ruben Goncalves; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.