Literature DB >> 25516077

A longitudinal comparison of retention in buprenorphine and methadone treatment for opioid dependence in New South Wales, Australia.

Lucy Burns1, Natasa Gisev, Sarah Larney, Timothy Dobbins, Amy Gibson, Jo Kimber, Briony Larance, Richard P Mattick, Tony Butler, Louisa Degenhardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To examine characteristics of first-time methadone and buprenorphine clients and factors associated with risk of leaving first treatment in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
DESIGN: Retrospective linkage study of opioid substitution therapy (OST) treatment, court, custody and mortality data.
SETTING: NSW, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: First-time OST entrants (August 2001-December 2010). MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of clients were examined. Time-dependent Cox models examined factors associated with the risk of leaving first treatment, with demographic, criminographic and treatment variables jointly considered. Interactions between medication and other variables upon risk of leaving treatment were examined.
FINDINGS: There were 15 600 treatment entrants: 7183 (46%) commenced buprenorphine, 8417 (54%) commenced methadone; the proportion entering buprenorphine increased over time. Those starting buprenorphine switched medications more frequently and had more subsequent treatment episodes. Buprenorphine retention was also poorer. On average, 44% spent 3+ months in treatment compared with 70% of those commencing methadone; however, buprenorphine retention for first-time entrants improved over time, whereas methadone retention did not. Multivariable Cox models indicated that in addition to sex, age, treatment setting and criminographic variables, the risk of leaving a first treatment episode was greater on any given day for those receiving buprenorphine, and was dependent on the year treatment was initiated. There was no interaction between any demographic variables and medication received, suggesting no clear evidence of any particular groups for whom each medication might be better suited in terms of improving retention.
CONCLUSIONS: Although retention rates for buprenorphine treatment have improved in New South Wales, Australia, individuals starting methadone treatment still show higher retention rates.
© 2014 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buprenorphine; methadone; opioid dependence; opioid substitution treatment; treatment retention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25516077     DOI: 10.1111/add.12834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  20 in total

1.  Adherence to and Retention in Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Adam Viera; Daniel J Bromberg; Shannon Whittaker; Bryan M Refsland; Milena Stanojlović; Kate Nyhan; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 2.  Opioid use disorder.

Authors:  John Strang; Nora D Volkow; Louisa Degenhardt; Matthew Hickman; Kimberly Johnson; George F Koob; Brandon D L Marshall; Mark Tyndall; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 52.329

3.  Long-term retention in Office Based Opioid Treatment with buprenorphine.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Hyunjoong W Kim; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Colleen T Labelle; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Sara S Bachman; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2016-12-30

4.  Trajectories of retention in opioid agonist therapy in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  M Eugenia Socías; Huiru Dong; Evan Wood; Rupinder Brar; Lindsey Richardson; Kanna Hayashi; Thomas Kerr; M-J Milloy
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2020-02-09

5.  Medication Treatment For Opioid Use Disorders In Substance Use Treatment Facilities.

Authors:  Ramin Mojtabai; Christine Mauro; Melanie M Wall; Colleen L Barry; Mark Olfson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Psychoactive medications and disengagement from office based opioid treatment (obot) with buprenorphine.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Hyunjoong Kim; Gabriela Gryczynski; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Commentary on Burns et al. (2015): retention in buprenorphine treatment.

Authors:  Andrew J Saxon
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Effects of access barriers and medication acceptability on buprenorphine-naloxone treatment utilization over 2 years: Results from a multisite randomized trial of adults with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Evans; Caroline Yoo; David Huang; Andrew J Saxon; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 9.  Identification and Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care: an Update.

Authors:  Joseph H Donroe; Elenore P Bhatraju; Judith I Tsui; E Jennifer Edelman
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 10.  Role of Cannabidiol in the Therapeutic Intervention for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Francisco Navarrete; María Salud García-Gutiérrez; Ani Gasparyan; Amaya Austrich-Olivares; Jorge Manzanares
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.