| Literature DB >> 25515535 |
Mohamed Ouldabdallahi1, Ismail Alew, Mohamed Salem Ould Ahmedou Salem, Mamadou Dit Dialaw Ba, Ali Ould Mohamed Salem Boukhary, Mohamed Lemine Ould Khairy, Mohamed Boubacar Abdel Aziz, Pascal Ringwald, Leonardo K Basco, Saidou Doro Niang, Sid Mohamed Lebatt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A regular evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in sentinel sites and a system of surveillance are required to establish treatment guidelines and adapt national anti-malarial drug policy to the rapidly changing epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria. The current anti-malarial treatment guideline in Mauritania, officially recommended since 2006, is based on artemisinin-based combination therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical efficacy and tolerance of artesunate-amodiaquine, the first-line treatment for acute uncomplicated malaria, in Mauritanian paediatric and adult patients to validate its continued use in the country.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25515535 PMCID: PMC4302080 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Study sites in Mauritania.
Patient characteristics on inclusion in two study sites in southern Mauritania
| Characteristics | Kobeni | Timbedra |
|---|---|---|
| Number of enrolled patients | 65 | 65 |
| Mean age (±SD, range), yr | 10.5 ± 5.7 (2–30) | 11.9 ± 11.2 (1–65) |
| Age groups | ||
| Under 5 years old, n (%) | 7 (10.8) | 11 (16.9) |
| 5-18 years old, n (%) | 51 (78.5) | 48 (73.8) |
| >18 years old, n (%) | 7 (10.8) | 6 (9.2) |
| Sex ratio (M/F) | 1.3 (37/28) | 1.5 (39/26) |
| Mean weight (±SD, range), kg | 29.4 ± 15.0 (8–70) | 29.0 ± 17.9 (7–0) |
| Mean body temperature (±SD, range), °C | 38.6 ± 1.0 (36.6-40.6)* | 37.6 ± 1.3 (36.0-40.6) |
| Proportion of patients with fever (≥37.5°C) (%) | 81.5 | 46.1 |
| Geometric mean parasitaemia (95% confidence interval, range), asexual parasites/μL | 9,230 (7,050-12,100)* | 2,090 (1,660-2,630) |
| 1,860-100,400 | 312–22,600 |
*Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (P <0.05) in the mean values between the patient populations in Kobeni and Timbedra.
Per protocol analysis of clinical outcome of artesunate-amodiaquine treatment in southern Mauritania
| Outcome | Kobeni | Timbedra |
|---|---|---|
| Number of enrolled patients | 65 | 65 |
| Exclusion after enrollment (before PCR correction), n | 7 | 2 |
| Lost-to-follow-up, n | 0 | 8 |
| Per protocol population (before PCR correction), n | 58 | 55 |
| PCR-uncorrected outcome | ||
| Early treatment failure, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Late clinical failure (LCF), n (%) | 2 (3.4) | 1 (1.8) |
| Late parasitological failure, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Adequate clinical and parasitological response, n (%) | 56 (96.6) | 54 (98.2) |
| Per protocol population after PCR correction, n* | 57 | 55 |
| PCR-corrected outcome | ||
| Early treatment failure, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Late clinical failure (LCF) due to recrudescence, n (%) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (1.8) |
| Late parasitological failure, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Adequate clinical and parasitological response, n (%) | 56 (98.2) | 54 (98.2) |
| Patients with fever on day 1, n (%) | 13 (22.4) | 7 (12.7) |
| Patients with fever on day 2, n (%) | 2 (3.4) | 0 |
| Patients with fever on day 3, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Patients with parasitaemia on day 2, n (%) | 46 (79.3) | 25 (45.5) |
| Patients with parasitaemia on day 3, n (%) | 0 | 0 |
*In Kobeni, one patient was excluded (i.e., censored) after PCR correction due to re-infection.
Figure 2Survival curves after artesunate-amodiaquine treatment (PCR-uncorrected) in Kobeni (black squares) and Timbédra (black circles).
Figure 3Survival curves after artesunate-amodiaquine treatment (PCR-corrected) in Kobeni (black squares) and Timbédra (black circles).