Literature DB >> 25515388

[Point-of-care testing in family practices: present use and need for tests in the future].

Jochen W L Cals1, Angel M R Schols, Henk C P M van Weert, Femke Stevens, Camiel G I P Zeijen, Gea Holtman, Wim A M Lucassen, Marjolein Y Berger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide insight into the current use, future needs, and attitudes towards point-of-care testing among Dutch family practitioners.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional online survey.
METHOD: We performed a survey among 2129 Dutch family practitioners. We asked respondents to report on the current and desired use of point-of-care tests, frequency of use, their opinions on aspects of point-of-care tests and consequences of point-of-care tests on their practice, acceptable waiting times for test results to come in, the desire for point-of-care tests at out-of-hours services, and conditions for which a point-of-care test could assist in diagnosis.
RESULTS: 639 family practitioners completed the survey (response rate: 30%). The most common point-of-care tests currently used by family physicians were: blood glucose (96%), urine leucocytes or nitrite (96%), urine pregnancy (94%), haemoglobin (58%), and CRP (48%). The most commonly desired point-of-care tests were: D-dimer (70%), troponin (65%), BNP (62%), chlamydia (60%), and INR (54%). Family practitioners expected point-of-care tests to have a positive effect on patient satisfaction (93%), diagnostic certainty (89%), antibiotics use (84%), and substitution to primary care (78%). They considered the proven effect on clinical management (46%) and the tests' reliability (35%) to be important aspects of point-of-care tests. Respondents wanted point-of-care tests to help them diagnose acute conditions, such as acute thromboembolic disorders (D-dimers), cardiac disorders (troponin, BNP), and infections (CRP, chlamydia).
CONCLUSION: The current use of point-of-care testing in family practice is restricted to a limited number of tests. In the future, Dutch family practitioners wish to use more point-of-care tests, especially in acute conditions in which a diagnostic decision needs to be made immediately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25515388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd        ISSN: 0028-2162


  7 in total

1.  Point-of-care B-type natriuretic peptide and portable echocardiography for assessment of patients with suspected heart failure in primary care: rationale and design of the three-part Handheld-BNP program and results of the training study.

Authors:  Caroline Morbach; Thomas Buck; Christian Rost; Sebastian Peter; Stephan Günther; Stefan Störk; Christiane Prettin; Raimund Erbel; Georg Ertl; Christiane E Angermann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic platform for rapid near-patient hematology.

Authors:  Neta Bachar; Dana Benbassat; David Brailovsky; Yochay Eshel; Dan Glück; Daniel Levner; Sarah Levy; Sharon Pecker; Evgeny Yurkovsky; Amir Zait; Cordelia Sever; Alexander Kratz; Carlo Brugnara
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 13.265

3.  Narrative review of primary care point-of-care testing (POCT) and antibacterial use in respiratory tract infection (RTI).

Authors:  Jonathan Cooke; Christopher Butler; Rogier Hopstaken; Matthew Scott Dryden; Cliodna McNulty; Simon Hurding; Michael Moore; David Martin Livermore
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2015-05-06

4.  Point-of-care testing in primary care: A systematic review on implementation aspects addressed in test evaluations.

Authors:  Deon Lingervelder; Hendrik Koffijberg; Ron Kusters; Maarten J IJzerman
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Pertussis diagnostic practices of general practitioners in the Netherlands: A survey study.

Authors:  Jeanne Heil; Jochen W L Cals; Henriëtte L G Ter Waarbeek; Christian J P A Hoebe; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Concordance of three point of care testing devices with clinical chemistry laboratory standard assays and patient-reported outcomes of blood sampling methods.

Authors:  Z Yonel; K Kuningas; P Sharma; M Dutton; Z Jalal; P Cockwell; J Webber; P Narendran; T Dietrich; I L C Chapple
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Impact of point-of-care panel tests in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Clare Goyder; Pui San Tan; Jan Verbakel; Thanusha Ananthakumar; Joseph J Lee; Gail Hayward; Philip J Turner; Ann Van Den Bruel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.