Literature DB >> 25514880

The blind spot in risk ethics: managing natural hazards.

Neelke Doorn1.   

Abstract

Many risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards.
© 2014 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  Distribution problem; ethics; natural hazard; responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25514880     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  1 in total

1.  Efficient or Fair? Operationalizing Ethical Principles in Flood Risk Management: A Case Study on the Dutch-German Rhine.

Authors:  Alessio Ciullo; Jan H Kwakkel; Karin M De Bruijn; Neelke Doorn; Frans Klijn
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.