Literature DB >> 25514489

Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic pituitary surgery with nasoseptal "rescue" flaps: electrocautery versus cold knife.

Sang Duk Hong1, Do-Hyun Nam, JunOh Park, Hyo Yeol Kim, Seung-Kyu Chung, Hun-Jong Dhong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olfaction has been shown to have a large impact on patients' lives. Endoscopic pituitary surgery is associated with potentially significant damage to olfactory tissues. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of cauterization on olfactory function when performing endoscopic pituitary surgery with a nasoseptal "rescue" flap.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of prospectively collected data. Olfaction was the primary outcome and was measured using the subjective visual analog scale (VAS; 0-100) and Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) before and 3 months after surgery. Significant olfactory deficit was defined as >20% loss compared with preoperative functions. Patients who underwent an endoscopic transsphenoidal approach with NSRFs for pituitary adenoma from June 2012 to March 2013 were included. Included patients were divided into two groups; group 1 underwent rescue flaps raised by monopolar cautery and group 2 underwent rescue flaps by cold knife.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in this study. There were 19 patients in group 1 and 30 patients in group 2. There was no significant difference in subjective olfactory change between the two groups (p = 0.386; group 1, 13.68 ± 17.7, versus group 2, 6.83 ± 8.25). However, 5 of 19 patients (26.3%) had significant olfactory loss in group 1 and 1 of 30 (3.3%) in group 2. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.027). None of the patients showed a significant decrease in CC-SIT score.
CONCLUSION: Raising the rescue flap by cold knife could reduce the rate of hyposmia compared with using an electrocautery postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25514489     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  6 in total

1.  Editorial: Studying the spectrum of allergic and rhinologic disease.

Authors:  Zachary M Soler
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christina Dorismond; Griffin D Santarelli; Brian D Thorp; Adam J Kimple; Charles S Ebert; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-08-07

Review 3.  Olfactory outcomes after endonasal skull base surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Junhao Zhu; Kaiyang Feng; Chao Tang; Jin Yang; Xiangming Cai; Chunyu Zhong; Chiyuan Ma
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Changes in olfactory function and olfactory bulb after treatment for acromegaly.

Authors:  Nazan Degirmenci; Hasan Bektas; Erol Senturk; Muzaffer Ilhan; Alev Gunaldi; Esra Ummuhan Mermi Yetis; Sabri Baki Eren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Olfactory-Specific Quality of Life Outcomes after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of the Sella.

Authors:  Milap D Raikundalia; Ryan J Huang; Lyndon Chan; Tracy Truong; Maragatha Kuchibhatla; James Merchant; Ralph Abi Hachem; Patrick J Codd; Ali R Zomorodi; Jordan I Teitelbaum; Bradley J Goldstein; David W Jang
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2021-10-29

6.  Superior turbinate management and olfactory outcome after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Pu Li; Kai Luo; Qiuhang Zhang; Zhenlin Wang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.858

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.