Literature DB >> 25514239

Best of both worlds: combining pharma data and state of the art modeling technology to improve in Silico pKa prediction.

Robert Fraczkiewicz1, Mario Lobell, Andreas H Göller, Ursula Krenz, Rolf Schoenneis, Robert D Clark, Alexander Hillisch.   

Abstract

In a unique collaboration between a software company and a pharmaceutical company, we were able to develop a new in silico pKa prediction tool with outstanding prediction quality. An existing pKa prediction method from Simulations Plus based on artificial neural network ensembles (ANNE), microstates analysis, and literature data was retrained with a large homogeneous data set of drug-like molecules from Bayer. The new model was thus built with curated sets of ∼14,000 literature pKa values (∼11,000 compounds, representing literature chemical space) and ∼19,500 pKa values experimentally determined at Bayer Pharma (∼16,000 compounds, representing industry chemical space). Model validation was performed with several test sets consisting of a total of ∼31,000 new pKa values measured at Bayer. For the largest and most difficult test set with >16,000 pKa values that were not used for training, the original model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.72, root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.94, and squared correlation coefficient (R(2)) of 0.87. The new model achieves significantly improved prediction statistics, with MAE = 0.50, RMSE = 0.67, and R(2) = 0.93. It is commercially available as part of the Simulations Plus ADMET Predictor release 7.0. Good predictions are only of value when delivered effectively to those who can use them. The new pKa prediction model has been integrated into Pipeline Pilot and the PharmacophorInformatics (PIx) platform used by scientists at Bayer Pharma. Different output formats allow customized application by medicinal chemists, physical chemists, and computational chemists.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25514239     DOI: 10.1021/ci500585w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  20 in total

1.  Tales from the war on error: the art and science of curating QSAR data.

Authors:  Marvin Waldman; Robert Fraczkiewicz; Robert D Clark
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Evaluating In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Toxicokinetics.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Michael F Hughes; Caroline L Ring; Denise K MacMillan; Jermaine Ford; Timothy R Fennell; Sherry R Black; Rodney W Snyder; Nisha S Sipes; Barbara A Wetmore; Joost Westerhout; R Woodrow Setzer; Robert G Pearce; Jane Ellen Simmons; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Standard state free energies, not pKas, are ideal for describing small molecule protonation and tautomeric states.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Taichi Murakami; Ariën S Rustenburg; Mehtap Işık; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  SAMPL6 challenge results from [Formula: see text] predictions based on a general Gaussian process model.

Authors:  Caitlin C Bannan; David L Mobley; A Geoffrey Skillman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Absolute and relative pKa predictions via a DFT approach applied to the SAMPL6 blind challenge.

Authors:  Qiao Zeng; Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  How Does the Methodology of 3D Structure Preparation Influence the Quality of pKa Prediction?

Authors:  Stanislav Geidl; Radka Svobodová Vařeková; Veronika Bendová; Lukáš Petrusek; Crina-Maria Ionescu; Zdeněk Jurka; Ruben Abagyan; Jaroslav Koča
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Use In Silico and In Vitro Methods to Screen Hepatotoxic Chemicals and CYP450 Enzyme Inhibitors.

Authors:  Yitong Liu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Samarjeet Prasad; Jing Huang; Qiao Zeng; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  High-throughput in-silico prediction of ionization equilibria for pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Cory L Strope; Kamel Mansouri; Harvey J Clewell; James R Rabinowitz; Caroline Stevens; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Enhancing Carbon Acid pKa Prediction by Augmentation of Sparse Experimental Datasets with Accurate AIBL (QM) Derived Values.

Authors:  Jeffrey Plante; Beth A Caine; Paul L A Popelier
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.