Literature DB >> 25514113

Enhancement of melphalan activity by buthionine sulfoximine and electroporation in melanoma cells.

Alessia Ongaro1, Agnese Pellati, Monica De Mattei, Francesca De Terlizzi, Carlo R Rossi, Luca G Campana.   

Abstract

Melphalan represents the reference drug for locoregional chemotherapy of melanoma; nevertheless, treatment failure may occur because of resistance to chemotherapy. Refractory melanoma cells show either an increased capability of drug inactivation, which is known to be associated with elevated intracellular levels of glutathione (GSH), or a decreased melphalan uptake. The aim of this study was to explore a biochemical and a biophysical strategy, and their combination, to overcome melphalan resistance in melanoma cells. The biochemical strategy was based on the treatment of melanoma cells with DL-buthionine (S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO) to deplete the GSH levels, thus reducing melphalan inactivation. In the biophysical strategy, cell membrane electroporation was used to increase melphalan uptake. The SK-MEL 28-resistant human melanoma cell line was pretreated with 50 μmol/l BSO for 24 h and then treated with increasing melphalan doses, with or without electroporation. Spectrophotometric quantification of cell viability was used to determine melphalan cytotoxicity. Intracellular total GSH was measured using a kinetic enzymatic assay. BSO induced 3.50-fold GSH depletion in untreated cells and a similar reduction was also maintained in melphalan-treated cells. BSO pretreatment produced a 2.46-fold increase in melphalan cytotoxicity. Electroporation increased melphalan cytotoxicity 1.42-fold. The combination of both BSO pretreatment with melphalan plus electroporation led to a 4.40-fold increase in melphalan cytotoxicity compared with melphalan alone. Pretreatment with BSO and cell membrane permeabilization by electroporation enhanced the cytotoxic activity of melphalan in melanoma cells. Their rational combination deserves further investigation and may improve the efficacy of locoregional chemotherapy of melanoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25514113     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  5 in total

Review 1.  Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Weitong Gao; Xueying Wang; Yang Zhou; Xueqian Wang; Yan Yu
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 2.  Induction and application of ferroptosis in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Qing Nie; Yue Hu; Xiao Yu; Xiao Li; Xuedong Fang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 3.  The Double-Edged Sword of Oxidative Stress in Skin Damage and Melanoma: From Physiopathology to Therapeutical Approaches.

Authors:  Monica Emanuelli; Davide Sartini; Elisa Molinelli; Roberto Campagna; Valentina Pozzi; Eleonora Salvolini; Oriana Simonetti; Anna Campanati; Annamaria Offidani
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23

4.  A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Judith G Villablanca; Samuel L Volchenboum; Hwangeui Cho; Min H Kang; Susan L Cohn; Clarke P Anderson; Araz Marachelian; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris; Charlotte E Hasenauer; Scarlett Czarnecki; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiro Shimada; Charles Patrick Reynolds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Emerging mechanisms and targeted therapy of ferroptosis in cancer.

Authors:  Haiyan Wang; Yan Cheng; Chao Mao; Shuang Liu; Desheng Xiao; Jun Huang; Yongguang Tao
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 12.910

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.