Literature DB >> 25512802

Pancreas transplantation: The Wake Forest experience in the new millennium.

Jeffrey Rogers1, Alan C Farney1, Giuseppe Orlando1, Samy S Iskandar1, William Doares1, Michael D Gautreaux1, Scott Kaczmorski1, Amber Reeves-Daniel1, Amudha Palanisamy1, Robert J Stratta1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the Wake Forest experience with pancreas transplantation in the new millennium with attention to surgical techniques and immunosuppression.
METHODS: A monocentric, retrospective review of outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) and solitary pancreas transplant (SPT) recipients was performed. All patients underwent pancreas transplantation as intent-to-treat with portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage and received depleting antibody induction; maintenance therapy included tapered steroids or early steroid elimination with mycophenolate and tacrolimus. Recipient selection was based on clinical judgment whether or not the patient exhibited measureable levels of C-peptide.
RESULTS: Over an 11.25 year period, 202 pancreas transplants were performed in 192 patients including 162 SKPTs and 40 SPTs. A total of 186 (92%) were primary and 16 (8%) pancreas retransplants; portal-enteric drainage was performed in 179 cases. A total of 39 pancreas transplants were performed in African American (AA) patients; of the 162 SKPTs, 30 were performed in patients with pretransplant C-peptide levels > 2.0 ng/mL. In addition, from 2005-2008, 46 SKPT patients were enrolled in a prospective study of single dose alemtuzumab vs 3-5 doses of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction therapy. With a mean follow-up of 5.7 in SKPT vs 7.7 years in SPT recipients, overall patient (86% SKPT vs 87% SPT) and kidney (74% SKPT vs 80% SPT) graft survival rates as well as insulin-free rates (both 65%) were similar (P = NS). Although mortality rates were nearly identical in SKPT compared to SPT recipients, patterns and timing of death were different as no early mortality occurred in SPT recipients whereas the rates of mortality following SKPT were 4%, 9% and 12%, at 1-, 3- and 5-years follow-up, respectively (P < 0.05). The primary cause of graft loss in SKPT recipients was death with a functioning graft whereas the major cause of graft loss following SPT was acute and chronic rejection. The overall incidence of acute rejection was 29% in SKPT and 27.5% in SPT recipients (P = NS). Lower rates of acute rejection and major infection were evidenced in SKPT patients receiving alemtuzumab induction therapy. Comparable kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were observed in AA and non-AA recipients despite a higher prevalence of a "type 2 diabetes" phenotype in AA. Results comparable to those achieved in insulinopenic diabetics were found in the transplantation of type 2 diabetics with detectable C-peptide levels.
CONCLUSION: In the new millennium, acceptable medium-term outcomes can be achieved in SKPT and SPTs as nearly 2/3rds of patients are insulin independent following pancreas transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alemtuzumab; Mycophenolate mofetil; Pancreas transplantation; Portal-enteric; Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin; Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation; Solitary pancreas transplantation; Steroid elimination; Surveillance biopsy; Tacrolimus

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512802      PMCID: PMC4265886          DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i6.951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Diabetes        ISSN: 1948-9358


  28 in total

Review 1.  The pancreas allograft donor: current status, controversies, and challenges for the future.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fridell; Jeffrey Rogers; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Banff schema for grading pancreas allograft rejection: working proposal by a multi-disciplinary international consensus panel.

Authors:  C B Drachenberg; J Odorico; A J Demetris; L Arend; I M Bajema; J A Bruijn; D Cantarovich; H P Cathro; J Chapman; K Dimosthenous; B Fyfe-Kirschner; L Gaber; O Gaber; J Goldberg; E Honsová; S S Iskandar; D K Klassen; B Nankivell; J C Papadimitriou; L C Racusen; P Randhawa; F P Reinholt; K Renaudin; P P Revelo; P Ruiz; J R Torrealba; E Vazquez-Martul; L Voska; R Stratta; S T Bartlett; D E R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  An analysis of the lack of donor pancreas utilization from younger adult organ donors.

Authors:  Alexander C Wiseman; Jennifer L Wainright; Elizabeth Sleeman; Maureen A McBride; Tim Baker; Ciara Samana; Peter Stock
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy in pancreas transplantation: One- and two-year outcomes.

Authors:  Ngoc L Thai; Akhtar Khan; Kusum Tom; Deanna Blisard; Amit Basu; Henkie P Tan; Amadeo Marcos; John J Fung; Thomas E Starzl; Ron Shapiro
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Outcome of untreated grade II rejection on solitary pancreas allograft biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Edward T Casey; Thomas C Smyrk; Lawrence J Burgart; Mark D Stegall; Timothy S Larson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease: the 20-yr experience.

Authors:  Jimmy Light; Marvin Tucker
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.863

7.  Histologic grading of acute allograft rejection in pancreas needle biopsy: correlation to serum enzymes, glycemia, and response to immunosuppressive treatment.

Authors:  J C Papadimitriou; C B Drachenberg; A Wiland; D K Klassen; J Fink; M R Weir; C Cangro; E J Schweitzer; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective.

Authors:  Robert J Stratta; Alan C Farney; Jeffrey Rogers; Giuseppe Orlando
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.473

9.  A randomized trial of alemtuzumab versus antithymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Alan C Farney; William Doares; Jeffrey Rogers; Rajinder Singh; Erica Hartmann; Lois Hart; Elizabeth Ashcraft; Amber Reeves-Daniels; Michael Gautreaux; Samy S Iskandar; Phillip Moore; Patricia L Adams; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Experience with protocol biopsies after solitary pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  R J Stratta; R J Taylor; M T Grune; R Sindhi; D Sudan; P Castaldo; K A Cushing; S J Radio; J L Wisecarver; A Matamoros
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium.

Authors:  Hany El-Hennawy; Robert J Stratta; Fowler Smith
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

2.  Pancreas-After-Islet Transplantation in Nonuremic Type 1 Diabetes: A Strategy for Restoring Durable Insulin Independence.

Authors:  S A Wisel; J M Gardner; G R Roll; J Harbell; C E Freise; S Feng; S M Kang; R Hirose; D B Kaufman; A M Posselt; P G Stock
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in Caucasian versus African American patients: Does recipient race influence outcomes?

Authors:  Jeffrey Rogers; Colleen L Jay; Alan C Farney; Giuseppe Orlando; Marie L Jacobs; David Harriman; Venkat Gurram; Berjesh Sharda; Komal Gurung; Amber Reeves-Daniel; William Doares; Scott Kaczmorski; Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez; Natalia Sakhovskaya; Michael D Gautreaux; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.456

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.