Literature DB >> 25512677

Degree of host susceptibility in the initial disease outbreak influences subsequent epidemic spread.

Paul M Severns1, Laura K Estep2, Kathryn E Sackett1, Christopher C Mundt1.   

Abstract

Disease epidemics typically begin as an outbreak of a relatively small, spatially explicit population of infected individuals (focus), in which disease prevalence increases and rapidly spreads into the uninfected, at-risk population. Studies of epidemic spread typically address factors influencing disease spread through the at-risk population, but the initial outbreak may strongly influence spread of the subsequent epidemic.We initiated wheat stripe rust Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici epidemics to assess the influence of the focus on final disease prevalence when the degree of disease susceptibility differed between the at-risk and focus populations.When the focus/at-risk plantings consisted of partially genetic resistant and susceptible cultivars, final disease prevalence was statistically indistinguishable from epidemics produced by the focus cultivar in monoculture. In these experimental epidemics, disease prevalence was not influenced by the transition into an at-risk population that differed in disease susceptibility. Instead, the focus appeared to exert a dominant influence on the subsequent epidemic.Final disease prevalence was not consistently attributable to either the focus or the at-risk population when focus/at-risk populations were planted in a factorial set-up with a mixture (~28% susceptible and 72% resistant) and susceptible individuals. In these experimental epidemics, spatial heterogeneity in disease susceptibility within the at-risk population appeared to counter the dominant influence of the focus.Cessation of spore production from the focus (through fungicide/glyphosate application) after 1.3 generations of stripe rust spread did not reduce final disease prevalence, indicating that the focus influence on disease spread is established early in the epidemic.Synthesis and applications. Our experiments indicated that outbreak conditions can be highly influential on epidemic spread, even when disease resistance in the at-risk population is greater than that of the focus. Disease control treatments administered shortly after the initial outbreak within the focus may either prevent an epidemic from occurring or reduce its severity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease epidemics; disease outbreak; disease spread; fat-tailed dispersal kernel; landscape epidemiology; long-distance dispersal; wheat stripe rust

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512677      PMCID: PMC4263813          DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8901            Impact factor:   6.865


  39 in total

Review 1.  Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management.

Authors:  C C Mundt
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 13.078

2.  Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind.

Authors:  Ran Nathan; Gabriel G Katul; Henry S Horn; Suvi M Thomas; Ram Oren; Roni Avissar; Stephen W Pacala; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Stochastic amplification in epidemics.

Authors:  David Alonso; Alan J McKane; Mercedes Pascual
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Ballooning dispersal in arthropod taxa: conditions at take-off.

Authors:  Andy M Reynolds; David A Bohan; James R Bell
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Landscape epidemiology of plant diseases.

Authors:  Manuel Plantegenest; Christophe Le May; Frédéric Fabre
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Primary disease gradients of wheat stripe rust in large field plots.

Authors:  Kathryn E Sackett; Christopher C Mundt
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness.

Authors:  Lynne Gilbert-Norton; Ryan Wilson; John R Stevens; Karen H Beard
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Initial epidemic area is strongly associated with the yearly extent of soybean rust spread in North America.

Authors:  Christopher C Mundt; Larae D Wallace; Tom W Allen; Clayton A Hollier; Robert C Kemerait; Edward J Sikora
Journal:  Biol Invasions       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Spatial variation in disease resistance: from molecules to metapopulations.

Authors:  Anna-Liisa Laine; Jeremy J Burdon; Peter N Dodds; Peter H Thrall
Journal:  J Ecol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.256

Review 10.  Spatial dynamics and genetics of infectious diseases on heterogeneous landscapes.

Authors:  Leslie A Real; Roman Biek
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  5 in total

1.  Local dispersal of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici from isolated source lesions.

Authors:  D H Farber; J Medlock; C C Mundt
Journal:  Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.590

2.  Does genetic diversity protect host populations from parasites? A meta-analysis across natural and agricultural systems.

Authors:  Amanda Kyle Gibson; Anna E Nguyen
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-11-14

3.  Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset.

Authors:  Paul M Severns; Christopher C Mundt
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-03-24

4.  Optimising and communicating options for the control of invasive plant disease when there is epidemiological uncertainty.

Authors:  Nik J Cunniffe; Richard O J H Stutt; R Erik DeSimone; Tim R Gottwald; Christopher A Gilligan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Focus expansion and stability of the spread parameter estimate of the power law model for dispersal gradients.

Authors:  Peter S Ojiambo; David H Gent; Lucky K Mehra; David Christie; Roger Magarey
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.061

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.