Literature DB >> 25512489

Cost-effective targeting of conservation investments to reduce the northern Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone.

Sergey S Rabotyagov1, Todd D Campbell2, Michael White3, Jeffrey G Arnold3, Jay Atwood4, M Lee Norfleet4, Catherine L Kling2, Philip W Gassman2, Adriana Valcu2, Jeffrey Richardson5, R Eugene Turner6, Nancy N Rabalais7.   

Abstract

A seasonally occurring summer hypoxic (low oxygen) zone in the northern Gulf of Mexico is the second largest in the world. Reductions in nutrients from agricultural cropland in its watershed are needed to reduce the hypoxic zone size to the national policy goal of 5,000 km(2) (as a 5-y running average) set by the national Gulf of Mexico Task Force's Action Plan. We develop an integrated assessment model linking the water quality effects of cropland conservation investment decisions on the more than 550 agricultural subwatersheds that deliver nutrients into the Gulf with a hypoxic zone model. We use this integrated assessment model to identify the most cost-effective subwatersheds to target for cropland conservation investments. We consider targeting of the location (which subwatersheds to treat) and the extent of conservation investment to undertake (how much cropland within a subwatershed to treat). We use process models to simulate the dynamics of the effects of cropland conservation investments on nutrient delivery to the Gulf and use an evolutionary algorithm to solve the optimization problem. Model results suggest that by targeting cropland conservation investments to the most cost-effective location and extent of coverage, the Action Plan goal of 5,000 km(2) can be achieved at a cost of $2.7 billion annually. A large set of cost-hypoxia tradeoffs is developed, ranging from the baseline to the nontargeted adoption of the most aggressive cropland conservation investments in all subwatersheds (estimated to reduce the hypoxic zone to less than 3,000 km(2) at a cost of $5.6 billion annually).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gulf of Mexico; agricultural conservation practices; eutrophication; evolutionary computation; hypoxic zone

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512489      PMCID: PMC4284528          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405837111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change.

Authors:  D Tilman; J Fargione; B Wolff; C D'Antonio; A Dobson; R Howarth; D Schindler; W H Schlesinger; D Simberloff; D Swackhamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search.

Authors:  Jasper A Vrugt; Bruce A Robinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems.

Authors:  Robert J Diaz; Rutger Rosenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A scenario and forecast model for Gulf of Mexico hypoxic area and volume.

Authors:  Donald Scavia; Mary Anne Evans; Daniel R Obenour
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  An integrated modeling approach for estimating the water quality benefits of conservation practices at the river basin scale.

Authors:  C Santhi; N Kannan; M White; M Di Luzio; J G Arnold; X Wang; J R Williams
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone.

Authors:  Sergey Rabotyagov; Todd Campbell; Manoj Jha; Philip W Gassman; Jeffrey Arnold; Lyubov Kurkalova; Silvia Secchi; Hongli Feng; Catherine L Kling
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Hypoxia is increasing in the coastal zone of the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Daniel J Conley; Jacob Carstensen; Juris Aigars; Philip Axe; Erik Bonsdorff; Tatjana Eremina; Britt-Marie Haahti; Christoph Humborg; Per Jonsson; Jonne Kotta; Christer Lännegren; Ulf Larsson; Alexey Maximov; Miguel Rodriguez Medina; Elzbieta Lysiak-Pastuszak; Nijolé Remeikaité-Nikiené; Jakob Walve; Sunhild Wilhelms; Lovisa Zillén
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health.

Authors:  Adam S Davis; Jason D Hill; Craig A Chase; Ann M Johanns; Matt Liebman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Ensemble modeling informs hypoxia management in the northern Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Donald Scavia; Isabella Bertani; Daniel R Obenour; R Eugene Turner; David R Forrest; Alexey Katin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Seafood prices reveal impacts of a major ecological disturbance.

Authors:  Martin D Smith; Atle Oglend; A Justin Kirkpatrick; Frank Asche; Lori S Bennear; J Kevin Craig; James M Nance
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Impact of Federal and State Conservation Programs on Farmer Nitrogen Management.

Authors:  Adam P Reimer; Riva C H Denny; Diana Stuart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Finding water scarcity amid abundance using human-natural system models.

Authors:  William K Jaeger; Adell Amos; Daniel P Bigelow; Heejun Chang; David R Conklin; Roy Haggerty; Christian Langpap; Kathleen Moore; Philip W Mote; Anne W Nolin; Andrew J Plantinga; Cynthia L Schwartz; Desiree Tullos; David P Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Natural climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Fargione; Steven Bassett; Timothy Boucher; Scott D Bridgham; Richard T Conant; Susan C Cook-Patton; Peter W Ellis; Alessandra Falcucci; James W Fourqurean; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Huan Gu; Benjamin Henderson; Matthew D Hurteau; Kevin D Kroeger; Timm Kroeger; Tyler J Lark; Sara M Leavitt; Guy Lomax; Robert I McDonald; J Patrick Megonigal; Daniela A Miteva; Curtis J Richardson; Jonathan Sanderman; David Shoch; Seth A Spawn; Joseph W Veldman; Christopher A Williams; Peter B Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Marci Baranski; Patricia Elias; Richard A Houghton; Emily Landis; Emily McGlynn; William H Schlesinger; Juha V Siikamaki; Ariana E Sutton-Grier; Bronson W Griscom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.