Literature DB >> 25512302

Maternal-zygotic knockout reveals a critical role of Cdx2 in the morula to blastocyst transition.

Agnieszka Jedrusik1, Andy Cox1, Krzysztof B Wicher1, David M Glover2, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz1.   

Abstract

The first lineage segregation in the mouse embryo generates the inner cell mass (ICM), which gives rise to the pluripotent epiblast and therefore the future embryo, and the trophectoderm (TE), which will build the placenta. The TE lineage depends on the transcription factor Cdx2. However, when Cdx2 first starts to act remains unclear. Embryos with zygotic deletion of Cdx2 develop normally until the late blastocyst stage leading to the conclusion that Cdx2 is important for the maintenance but not specification of the TE. In contrast, down-regulation of Cdx2 transcripts from the early embryo stage results in defects in TE specification before the blastocyst stage. Here, to unambiguously address at which developmental stage Cdx2 becomes first required, we genetically deleted Cdx2 from the oocyte stage using a Zp3-Cre/loxP strategy. Careful assessment of a large cohort of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos, all individually filmed, examined and genotyped, reveals an earlier lethal phenotype than observed in Cdx2 zygotic null embryos that develop until the late blastocyst stage. The developmental failure of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos is associated with cell death and failure of TE specification, starting at the morula stage. These results indicate that Cdx2 is important for the correct specification of TE from the morula stage onwards and that both maternal and zygotic pools of Cdx2 are required for correct pre-implantation embryogenesis.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cdx2; Maternal-zygotic knockout; Mouse embryo; Trophectoderm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25512302      PMCID: PMC4319684          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


Introduction

Prior to zygotic genome activation (ZGA), embryonic development is dependent on maternally inherited RNAs and proteins (Bachvarova and De Leon, 1980; Braude et al., 1979; Cascio and Wassarman, 1982; Van Blerkom, 1981). In the mouse, there are two waves of ZGA: a minor one at the late zygote stage and a major one at the 2-cell stage (Flach et al., 1982; Latham and Schultz, 2001). Despite this early ZGA, maternal factors are recognised as essential for embryo viability and also lineage segregation (Keramari et al., 2010; Zuccotti et al., 2011). Maternal factors can either rescue or significantly delay development of the mutant phenotype in zygotic knockout embryos (Avilion et al., 2003; Larue et al., 1994; Reithmacher et al., 1995). It is therefore important to consider the contribution of both maternal and zygotic gene expression to embryo development, particularly at the pre-implantation stages. The first lineage segregation in the mouse embryo leads to separation of inside and outside cells that occurs in two cell division waves: at the 8–16 cell and 16–32 cell transition (Bischoff et al., 2008; Graham and Deussen, 1978; Johnson and Ziomek, 1982; Pedersen et al., 1986). Inside and outside cells will develop their unique identity due to their differential position and due to asymmetric partitioning of cell polarity proteins, such as Par1, Par3, aPKC, Jam1, Ezrin and transcripts, such as Cdx2 (Louvet et al., 1996; Nishioka et al., 2009; Skamagki et al., 2013; Tarkowski and Wroblewska, 1967; Thomas et al., 2004; Vinot et al., 2005). Together differential partitioning of key cellular components and differential cell positioning establish the inside–outside asymmetry within the embryo that leads to development of the ICM and TE lineages. Cdx2 is an essential transcription factor for the development of the mouse embryo at many developmental stages (Gao et al., 2009; Grainger et al., 2010; Morris et al., 2014; Stringer et al., 2012; van Rooijen et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2014). During pre-implantation development, Cdx2 is essential for the TE lineage, but the stage of development at which Cdx2 plays a role and the processes it controls both remain unclear. Embryos with zygotic deletion of Cdx2 develop normally until the late blastocyst stage leading to the suggestion that Cdx2 is involved only in maintenance of the TE lineage (Ralston and Rossant, 2008; Strumpf et al., 2005). However, down-regulation of both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 expression by RNAi or morpholino treatments results in a much earlier phenotype that includes defects in cell polarisation, developmental arrest (Jedrusik et al., 2010) and the abnormal activity of mitochondria (Wu et al., 2010). These studies led to the suggestion that Cdx2 might have two roles in pre-implantation development: first, to ensure appropriate cell polarisation that is critical for TE formation and second, the subsequent maintenance of the TE lineage. Functionality of maternal Cdx2 was recently questioned as embryos in which maternal Cdx2 expression was genetically eliminated developed normally (Blij et al., 2012). Here, to address this discrepancy we have genetically ablated both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 and filmed development of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic and Cdx2 maternal and Cdx2 zygotic knockout embryos side-by-side to compare development to the blastocyst stage. This revealed that embryos deficient for both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 show significantly reduced developmental potential and increased cell death from the morula stage onwards. The developmental lethality is significantly stronger following depletion of both maternal and zygotic pools of Cdx2, rather than when only maternal or only zygotic Cdx2 are eliminated. Together, these results lead us to conclude that both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 are important for the development of the mouse embryo and that the first stage of development at which Cdx2 plays a role is at the morula stage when specification of the TE first starts.

Materials and methods

Mouse strains

To obtain oocytes depleted of maternal Cdx2, we used females heterozygous for a floxed Cdx2 gene (Gao et al., 2009) and a Cdx2 deletion (Cdx2Δ), and carrying a Zp3-Cre transgene (de Vries et al., 2000) (Cdx2/Cdx2Δ; Zp3-Cre females). These females were mated with Cdx2/Cdx2Δ males (Fig. 1). The Cdx2 line (Gao et al., 2009) was a kind gift from Klaus H Kaestner. Complete cleavage of the Cdx2loxP allele in the female germline by Cre recombinase results in 100% of mature oocytes carrying the Cdx2Δ. 50% of the resulting embryos that are Cdx2Δ/Cdx2Δ are maternal-zygotic knockouts (MZ-KO) and the 50% Cdx2Δ/Cdx2 embryos that have a wild-type (but floxed) paternal Cdx2 allele are heterozygous maternal knockouts (M-KO). Control females were either Cdx2 homozygotes or Cdx2/Cdx2Δ heterozygotes and did not carry the Zp3-Cre transgene. To obtain embryos depleted of zygotic Cdx2 (Z-KO), mice heterozygous for the Cdx2 targeted mutation Cdx2 that we refer to as Cdx2- were intercrossed (MGI:1857928) (Chawengsaksophak et al., 1997).
Fig. 1

Breeding schemes used to generate Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout and maternal knockout embryos.

Embryo recovery, culture and time-lapse microscopy

Mouse embryos were recovered from oviducts of superovulated females (10 IU PMSG, 10 IU hCG; Intervet), collected into M2 medium with 4 mg/ml BSA, and cultured in KSOM supplemented with 4 mg/ml BSA as described before (Jedrusik et al., 2008). To record the development of each individual embryo, embryos were cultured on gridded dishes and filmed by time-lapse microscopy. Imaging was non-invasive and carried out using a wide-field Zeiss microscope with a Hamamatsu Orca ER digital camera and DIC Z-stacks were collected at 15 min intervals for 58 h. To analyse any occurrence of cell death during embryo development, SYTOX fluorescent green nucleic acid stain (Life technologies) was added to the culture medium as previously described (Bedzhov and Zernicka-Goetz, 2014).

Individual embryo immunofluorescence and genotyping

Individual embryos were removed from the gridded dish upon completion of time-lapse imaging, fixed individually in 4% PFA (4 °C, 12 h) and processed for immunofluorescence as previously described (Plusa et al., 2005). Primary antibodies: mouse anti-Cdx2 (BioGenex; 1:200), rat TROMA-1 anti-cytokeratin-8 (DSHB, Iowa; 1:100); and rabbit anti-Nanog (R&D Systems; 1:200). DNA was stained with Hoechst (Sigma). Images were recorded using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope with a 40× oil objective. Following immunofluorescence, the genotype of each embryo was determined by PCR. To this end, genomic DNA was extracted from individual embryos in 10 µl extraction/neutralization buffers (Truett et al., 2000). 4.5–5 µl of the lysate was used in PCR reactions using the Fast Cycling PCR Kit (Qiagen) and primers: 5′-GACCGAAGTCTGCAGAACCT and 5′-GGCTCAGGACTTGCTCCTTCA to detect Cdx2 WT and Cdx2 KO alleles; and 5′-AGCCCATTGCTGGACGGAGG and 5′-CCGCTTACCTTGACGCCACA to detect cleaved KO (null) allele.

Results

Cdx2 is required for correct development to the blastocyst stage in vivo

The stage at which Cdx2 is first required for development of the mouse embryo remains unclear because Cdx2 is expressed both maternally and zygotically (Jedrusik et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2010). To address this, we used a genetic approach to deplete maternal and zygotic pools of Cdx2 from the oocyte stage onwards by crossing females heterozygous for a floxed Cdx2 gene and a Cdx2 deletion and carrying the Cre-recombinase gene under control of the ZP3 promotor (Cdx2/Cdx2Δ; Zp3-Cre) with Cdx2/Cdx2Δ males (Fig. 1). This cross results in equal proportions of homozygotes for the Cdx2 deletion and heterozygotes with one deleted copy and one floxed copy. We first allowed the embryos to develop in utero and recovered them 3.75 days after fertilisation when they should have reached the mature blastocyst stage. To ensure that the embryos were of the highest possible quality, embryos were recovered from naturally mated rather than super-ovulated females. We found that none of the Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos (0 out of 8, 0%) developed to the blastocyst stage (Fig. 2A). This was in contrast to their heterozygous siblings, Cdx2 maternal-knockout embryos, where 6 out of 10 (60%) embryos developed to the blastocyst stage. In a control group of embryos from Cdx2/Cdx2 mothers lacking the ZP3-Cre transgene, 15 out of 17 (88%) progressed to the blastocyst stage. Thus, deficiency of maternal and zygotic Cdx2 expression leads to an earlier lethal phenotype than observed for the Cdx2 zygotic knockout alone when embryos develop normally until the late blastocyst stage (Ralston and Rossant, 2008; Strumpf et al., 2005). These results indicate a role for maternally provided Cdx2 in development before the blastocyst stage.
Fig. 2

(A) Development of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos in vivo and in vitro. Summary of data on the frequency of blastocyst formation in embryos developing in utero. Experimental embryos are progeny of Cdx2loxP/Cdx2∆; Zp3-cre mothers, and control group 1 Cdx2loxP/ Cdx2loxP mothers, in both cases crossed to Cdx2loxP/Cdx2∆ fathers. The embryos were recovered at E3.75. The average number of cells were as follows: control embryos (Cdx2loxP/Cdx2loxP), 60.5; control embryos (Cdx2loxP/Cdx2∆), 63.4; maternal knockout embryos (Cdx2loxP/Cdx2∆), 43.4; maternal-zygotic knockout embryos (Cdx2∆/Cdx2∆ ), 29.0. Embryo morphology was assessed immediately after recovery after which embryos were fixed, stained and genotyped. (B) Schematic representation of experimental design for culturing, time-lapse imaging and genotyping individual embryos. (C) Summary of data on the frequency of blastocyst formation in embryos developing in vitro. Control group 2 is progeny of Cdx2loxP parents; control group 3, are embryos from Cdx2+/− intercrosses. (D) Examples of embryo development from 4-cell to the blastocyst stage in control (upper panel) and maternal-zygotic knockout (MZ-KO) embryos (lower panels). Dying cells indicated with white arrows. Bar=25 μm. (E) Still images of time-lapse recording of pre-implantation development of Cdx2 MZ-KO (top two panels) and control (bottom panel) embryos. Dying cells are marked by SYTOX, a fluorescent green cell death reporter. Cell death in MZ-KO embryos is initiated at earlier developmental stages than in control embryos and with significantly higher frequency. Bar=25 μm.

Cdx2 is required for the morula to blastocyst stage transition in vitro

To determine the exact stage of the developmental arrest of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos, we next wished to monitor their progression from the 2-cell stage until the blastocyst stage. In order to observe the developing embryos continuously, we used time-lapse microscopy. Individual embryos were allocated to individual interstices of grids in a culture chamber so that the development of each embryo could be tracked before being genotyped. This allowed us to gather as much information as possible about successive stages of pre-implantation development of all individually genotyped embryos (Fig. 2B). We found that from 32 Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos, 69% arrested development at the morula stage (Cdx2Δ/Cdx2Δ embryos from Cdx2/Cdx2Δ; Zp3-Cre mothers; Fig. 2C), in agreement with our in vivo experiments above. This was in contrast to wild-type embryos of which 90% (N=10) developed to the blastocyst stage (Control group 2, progeny of Cdx2/Cdx2 parents; Figs. 2C; p=0.002, 2-tail Fisher exact test). We found that 55% (N=20) of Cdx2 maternal only knockout embryos (Cdx2/Cdx2Δ) arrested at the morula stage, in contrast to only 14% of Cdx2 zygotic only knockout embryos obtained by Cdx2+/− intercrosses (Cdx2−/−, Control group 3; N=7). Together these results suggest that maternal Cdx2 contributes to normal development from the morula to the blastocyst stage.

Cell death in maternal and zygotic Cdx2 knockout embryos

In order to understand the developmental failure of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos, we analysed time-lapse recordings. This revealed that while in wild-type embryos cell death does not occur until the late blastocyst stage, in Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos cell death occurs much earlier, at the morula stage (Fig. 2D, arrows). To confirm this observation, we next cultured Cdx2 maternal and maternal-zygotic knockout embryos in the presence of Sytox, a fluorescent nucleic acid stain which allows detection of cell death in vivo by time-lapse microscopy. To ensure that the embryos were of highest possible quality, embryos were recovered from naturally mated rather than super-ovulated Cdx2/Cdx2Δ; Zp3-Cre females. We analysed development of 25 embryos, from which we were able to genotype 16, from which 10 were Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos and 6 their heterozygous Cdx2 maternal only knockout siblings (the remaining embryos were lost during procedure or the genotyping result was ambiguous). This revealed that the absence of both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 led to a significantly higher number of dead cells compared to maternal depletion alone (4.1 cells per embryo versus 1.7 cells per embryo, respectively; p<0.005, 2-tail Fisher exact test). Together these results indicate that total loss of Cdx2 leads to cell death prior to blastocyst formation.

Cdx2 is required for correct TE specification

In order to determine the effect of depletion of both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 expression on lineage specification, we examined the expression of two lineage markers; the TE marker cytokeratin-8 (recognised by TROMA-1 antibody) and the ICM marker, Nanog. We found that cytokeratin-8 expression was either totally absent or significantly weaker in Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos in comparison to control embryos (Figs. 3A and B). Immunostaining also confirmed the loss of the Cdx2 TE marker, as expected (Figs. 3A, B, and D). To quantify the decrease in TROMA-1 staining, we have measured the fluorescent signal intensity using ImageJ and an automated macro by which image stacks were convolved with a Gaussian blur to reduce detector noise effects and then thresholded for calculation of the mean intensity. These analyses confirmed a significant decrease in cytokeratin-8 expression in Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout and maternal knockout embryos in comparison to Cdx2Δ/Cdx2 and Cdx2/Cdx2 control embryos that developed for the same period of time (p<0.05, Student׳s t-test). Immunofluorescence for the ICM marker Nanog in Cdx2 maternal-zygotic knockout embryos revealed its ectopic expression in outside cells (Fig. 3C), in agreement with the role of Cdx2 in down-regulating pluripotency genes. These results indicate that Cdx2 is important for the specification of the TE lineage.
Fig. 3

Aberrant trophectoderm specification in embryos lacking maternal and zygotic expression of Cdx2. (A) Expression of trophectoderm (TE) specific cytokeratins, recognised by TROMA-1 antibody, is reduced in Cdx2 MZ-KO (N=6) and M-KO (N=7) embryos in comparison to both heterozygous (N=4) and homozygous (N=4) controls allowed to develop for the same time period (4.5 days post-fertilisation). Fluorescent signal intensity was quantified using ImageJ and the pipeline was automated using a macro. Image stacks in the appropriate channels were convolved with a Gaussian blur (σ=2) to reduce the effects of detector noise, then thresholded using Li׳s Minimum Cross Entropy thresholding method. This was applied to areas that include all of the labelled membrane while excluding as much background as possible. The mean intensity value of thresholded areas in the stack was calculated. (B) Representative embryos from the quantitative analysis depicted in A. (C) Ectopic expression of Nanog (white arrows) in outside cells of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null (N=29) but not in control (Cdx2loxP) embryos. (D) Positive Cdx2 antibody control showing immunofluorscent detection of Cdx2 in trophoblast stem (TS) cells (top panel), and negative antibody control in E3.5 blastocyst (bottom panel) showing Cdx2 restriction to outer (TE) cells and omission from the ICM (indicated with dashed line).

Discussion

To address when Cdx2 function is required in early mouse development we have eliminated both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 expression to determine if this would result in an earlier phenotype than previously reported for Cdx2 zygotic null embryos, which progress normally to the blastocyst stage (Ralston and Rossant, 2008; Strumpf et al., 2005). To this end, we have used a ZP3-cre/loxP strategy that eliminates Cdx2 from the oocyte and time-lapse imaging to record individual embryos throughout pre-implantation development. This revealed that Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos show significantly reduced developmental potential to the blastocyst stage, increased cell death and failure of the specification of the TE lineage. This lethal phenotype of Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos occurred irrespective of whether embryos were allowed to develop in vivo or in vitro. This leads us to conclude that Cdx2 is important for correct development of the pre-implantation embryo due to a role in the specification of TE lineage from the morula stage. The findings we report here differ from the conclusion of a study examining the consequences of depleting maternal Cdx2 (Blij et al., 2012). It is unlikely that this difference reflects the effects of embryo culture conditions because we observe the same developmental lethality whether embryos develop in vivo or in vitro. It is possible that differences in the methods of analysis contributed to the apparent difference in outcome. In assessing developmental potential of Cdx2 maternal knockout embryos, Blij et al. (2012) reported no difference in litter size between wild-type females and maternal knockout females mated to wild-type males (7.3±1.5 and 7.0±0.5, respectively). By contrast, we found that 40% (N=10) of embryos deficient for only maternal Cdx2, and yet having zygotic expression of Cdx2, failed to develop to the blastocyst stage, compared with only 12% (N=17) of a control group within the same period of time. When the contribution of both maternal and zygotic Cdx2 were depleted (N=8), we found that none of the embryos developing in vivo reached the blastocyst stage. Another possibility is the number of embryos examined. Blij et al. (2012) cultured 11 Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null and 10 Cdx2 zygotic null embryos together and reported no differences in their development from the single cell to the blastocyst stage. We made time-lapse recordings of 32 individual Cdx2 maternal-zygotic and 20 individual maternal null embryos. This revealed that the majority (69%, N=32) of the Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null and 55% (N=20) of the maternal null embryos did not reach the blastocyst stage within 3 days of culture starting from the 2-cell stage. In comparison, only 15% of Cdx2 zygotic null embryos (N=7) and 7% of control group embryos (N=28) failed to reach the blastocyst stage within the same period of time. These results indicate that Cdx2 is important for efficient development to the blastocyst stage. Our time-lapse experiments revealed cell death in the Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos at the morula stage whereas cell death does not occur at this developmental stage in wild-type embryos. We also found that the Cdx2 maternal-zygotic null embryos showed either absent or significantly reduced expression of the classic TE maker cytokeratin-8 together with expression of the pluripotent marker, Nanog, in outside cells, suggesting failure in TE specification, in agreement with earlier Cdx2 down-regulation studies from the 2-cell stage (Jedrusik et al., 2010). Taken together, the findings we report here provide evidence that total depletion of Cdx2 compromises pre-implantation development, both in vivo and in vitro, and that this is associated with increased cell death and defects in TE specification starting in morula stage embryos. These results lead us to conclude that Cdx2 is involved in normal embryonic development of the mouse before the blastocyst stage.
  38 in total

1.  Expression of Cre recombinase in mouse oocytes: a means to study maternal effect genes.

Authors:  W N de Vries; L T Binns; K S Fancher; J Dean; R Moore; R Kemler; B B Knowles
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 2.  Embryonic genome activation.

Authors:  K E Latham; R M Schultz
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2001-06-01

3.  Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo.

Authors:  Berenika Plusa; Stephen Frankenberg; Andrew Chalmers; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Catherine A Moore; Nancy Papalopulu; Virginia E Papaioannou; David M Glover; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage.

Authors:  A K Tarkowski; J Wróblewska
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1967-08

5.  Features of cell lineage in preimplantation mouse development.

Authors:  C F Graham; Z A Deussen
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1978-12

6.  Homeosis and intestinal tumours in Cdx2 mutant mice.

Authors:  K Chawengsaksophak; R James; V E Hammond; F Köntgen; F Beck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Dan Strumpf; Chai-An Mao; Yojiro Yamanaka; Amy Ralston; Kallayanee Chawengsaksophak; Felix Beck; Janet Rossant
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Role of Cdx2 and cell polarity in cell allocation and specification of trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jedrusik; David-Emlyn Parfitt; Guoji Guo; Maria Skamagki; Joanna B Grabarek; Martin H Johnson; Paul Robson; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Contribution of JAM-1 to epithelial differentiation and tight-junction biogenesis in the mouse preimplantation embryo.

Authors:  Fay C Thomas; Bhavwanti Sheth; Judith J Eckert; Gianfranco Bazzoni; Elisabetta Dejana; Tom P Fleming
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function.

Authors:  Ariel A Avilion; Silvia K Nicolis; Larysa H Pevny; Lidia Perez; Nigel Vivian; Robin Lovell-Badge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mitotic Inheritance of mRNA Facilitates Translational Activation of the Osteogenic-Lineage Commitment Factor Runx2 in Progeny of Osteoblastic Cells.

Authors:  Nelson Varela; Alejandra Aranguiz; Carlos Lizama; Hugo Sepulveda; Marcelo Antonelli; Roman Thaler; Ricardo D Moreno; Martin Montecino; Gary S Stein; Andre J van Wijnen; Mario Galindo
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  Use of a human embryonic stem cell model to discover GABRP, WFDC2, VTCN1 and ACTC1 as markers of early first trimester human trophoblast.

Authors:  Rowan M Karvas; Samuel McInturf; Jie Zhou; Toshihiko Ezashi; Danny J Schust; R Michael Roberts; Laura C Schulz
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Causes and evolutionary consequences of primordial germ-cell specification mode in metazoans.

Authors:  Carrie A Whittle; Cassandra G Extavour
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Cell signaling and transcription factors regulating cell fate during formation of the mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  Tristan Frum; Amy Ralston
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  The landscape of accessible chromatin in mammalian preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Jingyi Wu; Bo Huang; He Chen; Qiangzong Yin; Yang Liu; Yunlong Xiang; Bingjie Zhang; Bofeng Liu; Qiujun Wang; Weikun Xia; Wenzhi Li; Yuanyuan Li; Jing Ma; Xu Peng; Hui Zheng; Jia Ming; Wenhao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Geng Tian; Feng Xu; Zai Chang; Jie Na; Xuerui Yang; Wei Xie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  FGFR1 regulates trophectoderm development and facilitates blastocyst implantation.

Authors:  Agata Kurowski; Andrei Molotkov; Philippe Soriano
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Making the first decision: lessons from the mouse.

Authors:  Agnieszka Jedrusik
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Single-cell gene expression of the bovine blastocyst.

Authors:  Verónica M Negrón-Pérez; Yanping Zhang; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  Role of yes-associated protein 1, angiomotin, and mitogen-activated kinase kinase 1/2 in development of the bovine blastocyst.

Authors:  Verónica M Negrón-Pérez; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 10.  The Role of Maternal-Effect Genes in Mammalian Development: Are Mammalian Embryos Really an Exception?

Authors:  Maureen L Condic
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.