Literature DB >> 25512176

Transanal minimal invasive surgery for rectal lesions: should the defect be closed?

D Hahnloser1, R Cantero, G Salgado, D Dindo, D Rega, P Delrio.   

Abstract

AIM: Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS) of rectal lesions is increasingly being used, but the technique is not yet standardized. The aims of this study were to evaluate peri-operative complications and long-term functional outcome of the technique and to analyse whether or not the rectal defect needs to be closed.
METHOD: Consecutive patients undergoing TAMIS using the SILS port (Covidien) and standard laparoscopic instruments were studied.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (68% male) of mean age 67 (± 15) years underwent single-port transanal surgery at three different centres for 37 benign lesions and 38 low-risk cancers located at a mean of 6.4 ± 2.3 cm from the anal verge. The median operating time was 77 (25-245) min including a median time for resection of 36 (15-75) min and for closure of the rectal defect of 38 (9-105) min. The defect was closed in 53% using interrupted (75%) or a running suture (25%). Intra-operative complications occurred in six (8%) patients and postoperative morbidity was 19% with only one patient requiring reoperation for Grade IIIb local infection. There was no difference in the incidence of complications whether the rectal defect was closed or left open. Patients were discharged after 3.4 (1-21) days. At a median follow-up of 12.8 (2-29) months, the continence was normal (Vaizey score of 1.5; 0-16).
CONCLUSION: Transanal rectal resection can be safely and efficiently performed by means of a SILS port and standard laparoscopic instruments. The rectal defect may be left open and at 1 year continence is not compromised. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Single-port transanal surgery; closure; single-incision laparoscopic surgery; transanal endoscopic microsurgery; transanal minimal invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25512176     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  25 in total

1.  Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.

Authors:  George Molina; Liliana Bordeianou; Paul Shellito; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art.

Authors:  D S Keller; E M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  TAMIS for rectal tumors: advancements of a new approach.

Authors:  Daniela Rega; Ugo Pace; Antonello Niglio; Dario Scala; Cinzia Sassaroli; Paolo Delrio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery].

Authors:  W Kneist
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): a clinical spotlight review.

Authors:  Teresa deBeche-Adams; Imran Hassan; Stephen Haggerty; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Significance of defect closure following transanal local full-thickness excision of rectal malignant tumors.

Authors:  Shingo Noura; Masayuki Ohue; Norikatsu Miyoshi; Masayoshi Yasui
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-04

Review 7.  Should the rectal defect be closed following transanal local excision of rectal tumors? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Menahem; A Alves; R Morello; J Lubrano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery approach for rectal GIST.

Authors:  J Pintor-Tortolero; J C García; R Cantero
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  [Full thickness resection device (FTRD). Experience and outcome for benign neoplasms of the rectum and colon].

Authors:  H-J Richter-Schrag; C Walker; R Thimme; A Fischer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Is there any role for minimally invasive surgery in NET?

Authors:  M Thomaschewski; H Neeff; T Keck; H P H Neumann; T Strate; E von Dobschuetz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.