Literature DB >> 25511902

Yield performance and stability of CMS-based triticale hybrids.

Jonathan Mühleisen1, Hans-Peter Piepho, Hans Peter Maurer, Jochen Christoph Reif.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: CMS-based triticale hybrids showed only marginal midparent heterosis for grain yield and lower dynamic yield stability compared to inbred lines. Hybrids of triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) are expected to possess outstanding yield performance and increased dynamic yield stability. The objectives of the present study were to (1) examine the optimum choice of the biometrical model to compare yield stability of hybrids versus lines, (2) investigate whether hybrids exhibit a more pronounced grain yield performance and yield stability, and (3) study optimal strategies to predict yield stability of hybrids. Thirteen female and seven male parental lines and their 91 factorial hybrids as well as 30 commercial lines were evaluated for grain yield in up to 20 environments. Hybrids were produced using a cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS)-inducing cytoplasm that originated from Triticumtimopheevii Zhuk. We found that the choice of the biometrical model can cause contrasting results and concluded that a group-by-environment interaction term should be added to the model when estimating stability variance of hybrids and lines. midparent heterosis for grain yield was on average 3 % with a range from -15.0 to 11.5 %. No hybrid outperformed the best inbred line. Hybrids had, on average, lower dynamic yield stability compared to the inbred lines. Grain yield performance of hybrids could be predicted based on midparent values and general combining ability (GCA)-predicted values. In contrast, stability variance of hybrids could be predicted only based on GCA-predicted values. We speculated that negative effects of the used CMS cytoplasm might be the reason for the low performance and yield stability of the hybrids. For this purpose a detailed study on the reasons for the drawback of the currently existing CMS system in triticale is urgently required comprising also the search of potentially alternative hybridization systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25511902     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2429-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  10 in total

1.  Molecular marker-based prediction of hybrid performance in maize using unbalanced data from multiple experiments with factorial crosses.

Authors:  Tobias A Schrag; Jens Möhring; Hans Peter Maurer; Baldev S Dhillon; Albrecht E Melchinger; Hans-Peter Piepho; Anker P Sørensen; Matthias Frisch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Hybrid breeding in wheat: technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production.

Authors:  Ryan Whitford; Delphine Fleury; Jochen C Reif; Melissa Garcia; Takashi Okada; Viktor Korzun; Peter Langridge
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  A stage-wise approach for the analysis of multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Piepho; Jens Möhring; Torben Schulz-Streeck; Joseph O Ogutu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 4.  Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals.

Authors:  Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Jonathan Mühleisen; Hans Peter Maurer; Hongliang Zhang; Manje Gowda; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Long-term perspective of hybrid versus line breeding in wheat based on quantitative genetic theory.

Authors:  C Friedrich H Longin; Jochen C Reif; Tobias Würschum
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Split-gene system for hybrid wheat seed production.

Authors:  Katja Kempe; Myroslava Rubtsova; Mario Gils
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability.

Authors:  G K Shukla
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Exploitation of yield stability in barley.

Authors:  Jonathan Mühleisen; Hans-Peter Piepho; Hans Peter Maurer; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Hybrid wheat: quantitative genetic parameters and consequences for the design of breeding programs.

Authors:  Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Manje Gowda; Jonathan Mühleisen; Erhard Ebmeyer; Ebrahim Kazman; Ralf Schachschneider; Johannes Schacht; Martin Kirchhoff; Yusheng Zhao; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Yield stability of hybrids versus lines in wheat, barley, and triticale.

Authors:  Jonathan Mühleisen; Hans-Peter Piepho; Hans Peter Maurer; Carl Friedrich Horst Longin; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.699

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Optimum breeding strategies using genomic selection for hybrid breeding in wheat, maize, rye, barley, rice and triticale.

Authors:  Jose J Marulanda; Xuefei Mi; Albrecht E Melchinger; Jian-Long Xu; T Würschum; C Friedrich H Longin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in hybrid breeding in field crops.

Authors:  Abhishek Bohra; Uday C Jha; Premkumar Adhimoolam; Deepak Bisht; Narendra P Singh
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Phenotypic Data from Inbred Parents Can Improve Genomic Prediction in Pearl Millet Hybrids.

Authors:  Zhikai Liang; Shashi K Gupta; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Yang Zhang; Daniel W Ngu; Ramesh Kumar; Hemant T Patil; Kanulal D Mungra; Dev Vart Yadav; Abhishek Rathore; Rakesh K Srivastava; Rajeev Gupta; Jinliang Yang; Rajeev K Varshney; Patrick S Schnable; James C Schnable
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 3.154

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.