Sally A Craig1, Sarah R Baker2, Helen D Rodd1. 1. Unit of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 2. Unit of Dental Public Health, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Facial and dental appearance influences how individuals are perceived by others. AIM: This study aimed to determine whether young people make judgements about other young people with visible enamel opacities. DESIGN: Focus group findings were used to develop a social attribute questionnaire to capture young people's dental appearance-related judgements. 547 pupils (aged 11-15 years), from two different schools, participated in the study. Half the participants were given full-face photographs of a boy and girl without an enamel defect, and the other half were given the same two photographs with the subjects' incisors digitally modified to show enamel opacities. Participants completed the attribute questionnaire to rate the photographic subjects according to six positive and five negative descriptors using a four-point Likert scale. The total attribute score (TAS) could range from 11 (most negative) to 44 (most positive). RESULTS: TAS was significantly lower for photographic subjects with enamel defects compared to the same subject with normal enamel appearance (P < 0.001, one sample t-test). Gender had a significant impact on TAS, with boys making more negative judgements than girls. Age and socio-economic status did not have an effect. CONCLUSION: Young people may make negative psychosocial judgements on the basis of enamel appearance.
BACKGROUND: Facial and dental appearance influences how individuals are perceived by others. AIM: This study aimed to determine whether young people make judgements about other young people with visible enamel opacities. DESIGN: Focus group findings were used to develop a social attribute questionnaire to capture young people's dental appearance-related judgements. 547 pupils (aged 11-15 years), from two different schools, participated in the study. Half the participants were given full-face photographs of a boy and girl without an enamel defect, and the other half were given the same two photographs with the subjects' incisors digitally modified to show enamel opacities. Participants completed the attribute questionnaire to rate the photographic subjects according to six positive and five negative descriptors using a four-point Likert scale. The total attribute score (TAS) could range from 11 (most negative) to 44 (most positive). RESULTS: TAS was significantly lower for photographic subjects with enamel defects compared to the same subject with normal enamel appearance (P < 0.001, one sample t-test). Gender had a significant impact on TAS, with boys making more negative judgements than girls. Age and socio-economic status did not have an effect. CONCLUSION: Young people may make negative psychosocial judgements on the basis of enamel appearance.
Authors: Moza Al Khayyal; Manal Al Halabi; Iyad Hussein; Anas Salami; Helen Rodd; Amar Hassan; Mawlood Kowash Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Date: 2021-06-10