Thomas A Wills1, Rebecca Knight2, Rebecca J Williams3, Ian Pagano2, James D Sargent4. 1. University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; Twills@cc.hawaii.edu. 2. University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; 3. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii; and. 4. Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and cigarette use among adolescents and determine whether established risk factors for smoking discriminate user categories. METHODS: School-based survey of 1941 high school students (mean age 14.6 years) in Hawaii; data collected in 2013. The survey assessed e-cigarette use and cigarette use, alcohol and marijuana use, and psychosocial risk and protective variables (eg, parental support, academic involvement, smoking expectancies, peer smoking, sensation seeking). Analysis of variance and multinomial regression examined variation in risk and protective variables across the following categories of ever-use: e-cigarette only, cigarette only, dual use (use of both products), and nonuser (never used either product). RESULTS: Prevalence for the categories was 17% (e-cigarettes only), 12% (dual use), 3% (cigarettes only), and 68% (nonusers). Dual users and cigarette-only users were highest on risk status (elevated on risk factors and lower on protective factors) compared with other groups. E-cigarette only users were higher on risk status than nonusers but lower than dual users. E-cigarette only users and dual users more often perceived e-cigarettes as healthier than cigarettes compared with nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a US adolescent sample with one of the largest prevalence rates of e-cigarette only use in the existing literature. Dual use also had a substantial prevalence. The fact that e-cigarette only users were intermediate in risk status between nonusers and dual users raises the possibility that e-cigarettes are recruiting medium-risk adolescents, who otherwise would be less susceptible to tobacco product use.
OBJECTIVE: To describe electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and cigarette use among adolescents and determine whether established risk factors for smoking discriminate user categories. METHODS: School-based survey of 1941 high school students (mean age 14.6 years) in Hawaii; data collected in 2013. The survey assessed e-cigarette use and cigarette use, alcohol and marijuana use, and psychosocial risk and protective variables (eg, parental support, academic involvement, smoking expectancies, peer smoking, sensation seeking). Analysis of variance and multinomial regression examined variation in risk and protective variables across the following categories of ever-use: e-cigarette only, cigarette only, dual use (use of both products), and nonuser (never used either product). RESULTS: Prevalence for the categories was 17% (e-cigarettes only), 12% (dual use), 3% (cigarettes only), and 68% (nonusers). Dual users and cigarette-only users were highest on risk status (elevated on risk factors and lower on protective factors) compared with other groups. E-cigarette only users were higher on risk status than nonusers but lower than dual users. E-cigarette only users and dual users more often perceived e-cigarettes as healthier than cigarettes compared with nonusers. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a US adolescent sample with one of the largest prevalence rates of e-cigarette only use in the existing literature. Dual use also had a substantial prevalence. The fact that e-cigarette only users were intermediate in risk status between nonusers and dual users raises the possibility that e-cigarettes are recruiting medium-risk adolescents, who otherwise would be less susceptible to tobacco product use.
Authors: Anamara Ritt-Olson; Joel Milam; Jennifer B Unger; Dennis Trinidad; Lorena Teran; Clyde W Dent; Steve Sussman Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ollie Ganz; Jennifer Cantrell; Joyce Moon-Howard; Angela Aidala; Thomas R Kirchner; Donna Vallone Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: William S John; He Zhu; Paolo Mannelli; Geetha A Subramaniam; Robert P Schwartz; Jennifer McNeely; Li-Tzy Wu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Aslesha Sumbe; Stephanie L Clendennen; Samuel C Opara; Christian D Jackson; Baojiang Chen; Anna V Wilkinson; Melissa B Harrell Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karin A Kasza; Kathryn C Edwards; Zhiqun Tang; Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Elisabeth Donaldson; Lynn C Hull; Hannah Day; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Izabella Zandberg; Lisa D Gardner; Hoda T Hammad; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Yuliyana Beleva; James Russell Pike; Stephen Miller; Bin Xie; Susan L Ames; Alan W Stacy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: John P Pierce; James D Sargent; Martha M White; Nicolette Borek; David B Portnoy; Victoria R Green; Annette R Kaufman; Cassandra A Stanton; Maansi Bansal-Travers; David R Strong; Jennifer L Pearson; Blair N Coleman; Eric Leas; Madison L Noble; Dennis R Trinidad; Meghan B Moran; Charles Carusi; Andrew Hyland; Karen Messer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Michael S Dunbar; Jordan P Davis; Anthony Rodriguez; Joan S Tucker; Rachana Seelam; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: William V Lechner; Cara M Murphy; Suzanne M Colby; Tim Janssen; Michelle L Rogers; Kristina M Jackson Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.913