Literature DB >> 25511014

Comparison of clinical and cone beam computed tomography measurements to diagnose furcation involvement.

I Darby1, M Sanelli1, S Shan1, J Silver1, A Singh1, M Soedjono1, L Ngo1.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to determine the degree of discrepancy between clinical measurement of furcation involvement (FI) and cone beam computed tomography image analysis of multirooted teeth.
METHODS: FI measurements obtained from clinical records were compared to CBCT images of the same teeth to determine the degree of discrepancy between CBCT FI grading and clinical FI grading.
RESULTS: Of the hundred and fifty-four sites analysed, 22% of FI measurements from probing and CBCT were in agreement. Fifty-eight percent of clinical FI recordings were overestimated, and 20% were underestimated when compared to CBCT analysis.
CONCLUSION: Clinical recording of FI is both over and underestimated compared to CBCT analysis. This was highest for probing recording grade I furcation involvement where it was highly overestimated. The occurrence of over and under estimation of FI will affect the assignment of prognosis to multirooted teeth, which can influence treatment planning for periodontal therapy and may result in inappropriate treatment.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  clinical probing; cone beam computed tomography; diagnosis; furcations; periodontitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25511014     DOI: 10.1111/idh.12116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg        ISSN: 1601-5029            Impact factor:   2.477


  7 in total

Review 1.  Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Letícia Fernanda Haas; Glaucia Santos Zimmermann; G De Luca Canto; Carlos Flores-Mir; Márcio Corrêa
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  [Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement].

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhao; Nan Wang; Yi Ding; Hai-Ying Zheng; Jun-Rong Qian
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  A controlled study on the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic and peri-apical radiography for detecting furcation involvement.

Authors:  Gijs Berghuis; Jan Cosyn; Hugo De Bruyn; Geert Hommez; Melissa Dierens; Véronique Christiaens
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Accuracy and Reliability of CBCT Compared to Clinical Probing in Detection of Trifurcation Defects: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Mohammad Alsakr; Adriana G Creanga; Abdullah Saad Alqahtani; Khalid Gufran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  The Radiographic Assessment of Furcation Area in Maxillary and Mandibular First Molars while Considering the New Classification of Periodontal Disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Alasqah; Fahad Dhaifallah Alotaibi; Khalid Gufran
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  A retrospective study on molar furcation assessment via clinical detection, intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Wenjian Zhang; Keagan Foss; Bing-Yan Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  A Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Parameters in the Evaluation of Molar Furcation Involvement in Periodontitis.

Authors:  Sanja Komšić; Darije Plančak; Adrian Kašaj; Ivan Puhar
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.