RATIONALE: Two biomarkers: concentration ratio of O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine and concentration sum of venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine were adopted to indicate venlafaxine responses, but neither is validated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of two biomarkers in reflecting venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations, and to further examine their relationship with venlafaxine treatment outcomes. METHODS: Two well-defined influencing factors: CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions were enriched into a three-period crossover study to produce venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations: In each period, healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM group; n = 12) and CYP2D6*10/*10 intermediate metabolizers (IM group; n = 12) were pretreated with clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), or nothing (control), or clarithromycin + paroxetine (CYP3A4 + CYP2D6 inhibitors), before administration of a single-dose of 75 mg venlafaxine. Both biomarkers were evaluated (1) for their relationship with the influencing factors in healthy volunteers and (2) for their relationships with the venlafaxine responses/adverse events reported in two patient studies. RESULTS: Significant venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations were observed between the EM and IM groups (geometric mean ratio [95 % CI] of area under the curve, 3.0 [1.8-5.1] in the control period), and between the control and clarithromycin + paroxetine periods (4.1 [3.5-4.7] and 2.0 [1.7-2.4] in the EM and IM group, respectively). O-Desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine was superior to venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine to reflect the influencing factors. In the patient studies, O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine > 4 showed high precision in predicting venlafaxine responders/partial-responders (92 %) and patients without venlafaxine-related adverse events (88 %); the O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 and venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine > 400 ng/ml combination showed higher precision (100 %) than O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 alone (65 %) in predicting venlafaxine non-responders. CONCLUSION: We propose using O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine for CYP2D6 phenotyping, and O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine with venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine for predicting venlafaxine treatment outcomes in future prospective studies.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Two biomarkers: concentration ratio of O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine and concentration sum of venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine were adopted to indicate venlafaxine responses, but neither is validated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of two biomarkers in reflecting venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations, and to further examine their relationship with venlafaxine treatment outcomes. METHODS: Two well-defined influencing factors: CYP2D6 genotypes and drug interactions were enriched into a three-period crossover study to produce venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations: In each period, healthy CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EM group; n = 12) and CYP2D6*10/*10 intermediate metabolizers (IM group; n = 12) were pretreated with clarithromycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor), or nothing (control), or clarithromycin + paroxetine (CYP3A4 + CYP2D6 inhibitors), before administration of a single-dose of 75 mg venlafaxine. Both biomarkers were evaluated (1) for their relationship with the influencing factors in healthy volunteers and (2) for their relationships with the venlafaxine responses/adverse events reported in two patient studies. RESULTS: Significant venlafaxine pharmacokinetic variations were observed between the EM and IM groups (geometric mean ratio [95 % CI] of area under the curve, 3.0 [1.8-5.1] in the control period), and between the control and clarithromycin + paroxetine periods (4.1 [3.5-4.7] and 2.0 [1.7-2.4] in the EM and IM group, respectively). O-Desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine was superior to venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine to reflect the influencing factors. In the patient studies, O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine > 4 showed high precision in predicting venlafaxine responders/partial-responders (92 %) and patients without venlafaxine-related adverse events (88 %); the O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 and venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine > 400 ng/ml combination showed higher precision (100 %) than O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine < 4 alone (65 %) in predicting venlafaxine non-responders. CONCLUSION: We propose using O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine for CYP2D6 phenotyping, and O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine with venlafaxine + O-desmethylvenlafaxine for predicting venlafaxine treatment outcomes in future prospective studies.
Authors: Laura Andrade; Jorge J Caraveo-Anduaga; Patricia Berglund; Rob V Bijl; Ron De Graaf; Wilma Vollebergh; Eva Dragomirecka; Robert Kohn; Martin Keller; Ronald C Kessler; Norito Kawakami; Cengiz Kiliç; David Offord; T Bedirhan Ustun; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Corbin J Bachmeier; David Beaulieu-Abdelahad; Nowell J Ganey; Michael J Mullan; Gary M Levin Journal: Biopharm Drug Dispos Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 1.627
Authors: Dara J Sakolsky; James M Perel; Graham J Emslie; Gregory N Clarke; Karen Dineen Wagner; Benedetto Vitiello; Martin B Keller; Boris Birmaher; Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow; Neal D Ryan; James T McCracken; Michael J Strober; Satish Iyengar; Giovanna Porta; David A Brent Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Scott D Patterson; Nadine Cohen; Maha Karnoub; Sharada Louis Truter; Eileen Emison; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Brian Spear; Ekopimo Ibia; Rizwana Sproule; Diane Barnes; Anahita Bhathena; Michael R Bristow; Chris Russell; Dai Wang; Amelia Warner; Agnes Westelinck; William Brian; Amir Snapir; Monique A Franc; Peggy Wong; Peter M Shaw Journal: Pharmacogenomics Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.533