Literature DB >> 25506158

Clinical profile and genetic correlation of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia: A study from a tertiary care centre in Eastern India.

Debabrata Pulai1, Deb Shankar Guin1, Kalyan B Bhattacharyya1, Goutam Ganguly1, Anindita Joardar2, Sarnava Roy2, Atanu Biswas1, Alak Pandit1, Arijit Roy1, Asit Kumar Senapati1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progressive cerebellar ataxia inherited by autosomal dominant transmission is known as Spino Cerebellar Ataxia (SCA). AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To look for various clinical profile and molecular genetics of patients with SCAs and their phenotype-genotype correlation of patients with SCAs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata from June 2010 to April 2013. We selected patients from the neurogenetic clinic of our institute and performed genetic test for SCA 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12. The diagnosis was based on suggestive clinical features and positive genetic study, done by polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: 83 patients were tested for trineucleotide repeats and turned out 45 positive for the mentioned SCAs. We found 13(28.9%) SCA-1, 18(40%) SCA-2, 7(15.6%) SCA-3, 6(13.3) SCA-6 and 1(2.2%) SCA-12 patients. Half of the remaining 38 patients had positive family history. The mean age of onset were 38.46 years in SCA-1, 29.55 years in SCA-2, 38.43 years in SCA-3, 47.33 years in SCA-6. Slow saccades were observed in 7(53.8%) SCA-1, 17(94.4%) SCA-2, 4(57.1%) SCA-3, 3(50%) SCA-6 patients. Hyporeflexia was noticed in 5(27.8%) SCA-2 patients. Pyramidal tract involvement was found in 8(61.5%) SCA-1, 4(22.2%) SCA-2, 4(57.1%) SCA-3 and 1(16.7%) SCA-6 patients.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed SCA-2 is the most common variety of SCA and genotypic-phenotypic correlation was observed in SCA-1,2,6 and 12 patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCA; SCA genetics; spinocerebellar ataxia; spinocerebellar ataxia genetics

Year:  2014        PMID: 25506158      PMCID: PMC4251010          DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.144005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol        ISSN: 0972-2327            Impact factor:   1.383


Introduction

Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are autosomal dominant progressive neurodegenerative disorders showing clinical and genetic heterogeneities.[1] SCAs usually manifest clinically in the third to fifth decade of life, although there is a wide variability in the age of onset. More than 36 different types of SCAs have been reported so far in the world and about half of them are caused by pathological expansion of the trinucleotide cytosine, adenine, guanine (CAG) repeat. The global prevalence of SCA is 0.3-2 per 100,000 population,[2] SCA3 being the most common variety, worldwide, accounting for 2050 per cent of all cases, though rare in India.[3] The prevalence varies significantly depending on race, place of birth and founder effect. One study conducted by Subramony et al.,[4] shows the prevalence to be 12 per 100,000 population, whereas a study in two villages comprising of ethnic Tamil community indicates that the prevalence is high, i.e. 7.2%.[5] Interest in the field of inherited ataxias in India has been kindled by the seminal work of Wadia et al., over a period of about three decades.[67] A number of other workers from India have reported the phenotype and genotype in various SCAs in their studies and showed that the clinical features and genotype varied in different geographical areas.[515] Variable phenotypic presentation and discovery of newer mutations in recent years need continued research on clinical and molecular aspects of SCAs, and the objective of the present study is to find out the clinical features and genetic pattern of different SCA patients seen in a tertiary care center in Eastern India.

Materials and Methods

This prospective study was carried out at Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, Kolkata, a tertiary referral center. We selected patients from the general outpatient department and they were sent to the neurogenetic clinic of our hospital. Eightythree consecutive cases of suspected SCAs were primarily included for genetic study after history taking, analysis of familial pedigree and clinical examination. The clinical examination was carried out by senior neurologists and the findings were recorded in structured proforma of the neurogenetic clinic. Ethical clearances for the above study was obtained from the institutional ethical committee governed by Indian council of Medical Reasearch (ICMR) guidelines and written consent from the patients was obtained before the genetic study. The inclusion criteria were cases with progressive degenerative cerebellar ataxia, familial or non-familial, who were negative for any known metabolic defect. In familial cases, one or more than one member had ataxia other than the proband. Non-familial or sporadic cases were individuals with features of primary degenerative cerebellar ataxia having no family history of similar illness. Sporadic cases could be the manifestation of new mutants or skipped generations in autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and possible unreliable family history about the previous generations. Patients with metabolic, toxic, nutritional, infective, neoplastic, vascular and alcohol-related degeneration were excluded. Clinical assessment of eye movement in different gaze was done and slow saccades were recognized when eyes moved in a particular gaze taking more than one jump. Slit lamp examination was done is all patients for the presence of Kayser-Fleischer ring, andneuroimaging of the brain was performed in all patients. Routine blood biochemistry including blood glucose, lipid profile, thyroid profile and serum ceruloplasmin were performed in all cases. Serum lactate and serum vitamin E level were performed in selected cases to exclude progressive ataxia of known metabolic origin. Electrophysiological evaluation including nerve conduction study was done in all cases. Videography of patients was done for careful examination of the saccadic eye movements.

Molecular genetics study

The genetic study was aimed at detection of trinucleotiderepeat expansions in known SCA genes. DNA was isolated from patients’ blood sample by phenol: Chloroform method. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out using primers of SCA1, SCA 2, SCA 3, SCA6 and SCA12. Agarose gel (12.4%) electrophoresis was carried out followed by visualizations of bands using ethidium bromide. The number of CAG repeat was ascertained by comparing with a 100 bp DNA ladder.

Results and Discussion

We analyzed the genotype of 83 clinically suspected cases of SCAs for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6 and SCA12. Forty-five cases were genetically positive for the above mentioned SCAs. Among genetically confirmed cases, we found 13 cases of SCA1, 18 cases of SCA2, 7 cases of SCA3, 6 cases of SCA6 and only one case of SCA12. Positive family history in different SCA patients is shown in Table 1. Demography and classification after genetic analysis of different SCA patients are shown in Table 2. Clinical and investigative parameters are shown in Table 3, while the relative frequency of different SCAs in India and abroad are shown in Table 4.
Table 1

Family history

Table 2

Demographic and classification after genotyping at SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6 and SCA12 loci

Table 3

Clinical and investigative parameters of the study patients with SCA

Table 4

Relative frequencies of different SCAs in India and outside India

Family history Demographic and classification after genotyping at SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6 and SCA12 loci Clinical and investigative parameters of the study patients with SCA Relative frequencies of different SCAs in India and outside India We describe the phenotypic features and genetic findings in patients of SCA and the estimated occurrence of ataxias in a tertiary care center in Eastern India. Total of 45 subjects out of the 83 investigated were positive for the mutation tested and SCA2, SCA1, SCA3, SCA6 and SCA12 were detected in descending order of frequency. SCA3 is the most common variety worldwide and it accounts for 2050 percent of all cases.[3] This is followed by SCA2, which accounts for 1020 percent of all cases and this is common in Europe, the USA and the UK.[2021] SCA 1 is common in Italy, South Africa, Northern Japan and Russia.[2022] In general, SCA1 and SCA2 are more frequent in populations of Caucasian ancestry, whereas SCA3 and Dentatorubropallidoluysian Atrophy are more common in population of Eastern ancestry.[23] In India, SCA2 is the most common form of ataxia in studies from northern,[9] eastern[1013] and western[714] India. However, Chakravorty et al.,[11] and Bhattacharya et al.,[12] reported SCA3 to be the most common variety in ethnic Bengalee population. Rengaraj et al.,[5] Krishna et al.,[17] and Mittal et al.,[24] found very high prevalence of SCA-1 in south Indian population. Significant variations in the incidence of different types of SCA have been reported form countries like Japan,[25] China,[26] Finland,[27] Korea[18] and Brazil[19] where diverse ethnic communities exist. India, another multiethnic country also shows variation in the occurrence of different types of SCA in different regions as mentioned earlier. Chakraborty et al.,[11] have reported 37 cases of SCA in 14 ethnic Bangalee families. They tested for SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3 only. Seventeen cases belonged to SCA3 genotype and six cases were SCA2, five cases were SCA1 and nine cases remained undetermined. Later on, Bhattacharyya et al.,[12] analyzed genotype of 35 individuals belonging to 18 families and they tested for SCA1, SCA 2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA12 and SCA17. They found 6 cases of SCA1, 8 cases of SCA2, 10 cases of SCA3 and 11 cases of undetermined variety. In our study, we did not include family members of the patients and we found SCA2 in 18 cases, SCA1 in 13 cases, SCA3 in 7 cases, SCA6 in 6 cases and SCA12 in one case, whereas 38 cases were of undetermined variety. So, this present study shows that SCA 2 is the most common variety and SCA3 is of lower occurrence in the general population when ethnic factors are not taken into account. We have also shown significant occurrence of SCA6 (13.33%) patients in the study from Eastern India, which was not observed before. The apparent difference from the earlier study could be due to study on limited number of families (14 and 18 families) whereas this study included 83 probands. Clustering effect could also be present in the previous studies. We observed clinical heterogeneity among different genotypes of SCA, which was also found in previous studies. All but one patient with SCA1 genotype presented with gait ataxia and dysarthria initially. One patient of SCA1 had tremulousness of upper limbs as the initial presentation. Slow saccadic eye movement was noted in 7 (53.85%) of 13 SCA1 patients. Among the less frequently present signs were tremor in limbs (38.46%) and pyramidal signs (23.08%) All except one in SCA2 (94.44%) category showed typical cerebellar signs and slow saccadic eye movements. In nine out of 18 cases, we found obligatory blink with head thrust while testing for saccadic eye movement. Though slow saccades are characteristic of SCA2, they were also observed in other varieties as described by Wadia et al.[7] We found slow saccade in 4 patients (57%) of SCA3, three patients (50%) of SCA6 and in the single SCA-12 patient. Hyporeflexia caused by peripheral neuropathy is an important phenotypic clue for diagnosis of SCA2.[56911] Four (22.22%) of our patients of SCA 2 and none from other SCA types showed clinical and or electrophysiological features suggestive of peripheral neuropathy and distal amyotrophy. Bhattacharyya et al.,[12] also found peripheral neuropathy in half of their SCA2 patients. None of our patients had bulbar features including lingual atrophy and perioral fasciculation, which are common in SCA 3 patients. We also performed Mini Mental Status examination in all SCA patients but cognitive decline was not noted in any of our patients. Bhattacharyya et al., found cognitive abnormality in none, but in one SCA1 patient. Thus, our findings corroborate with that of Bhattacharyya et al.[12] On the contrary Chakravarty et al.,[11] found significant cognitive decline in SCA3 and SCA2 patients in their study. Though we have noted slow saccadic movement in 53.85 % of SCA1, 94.44% of SCA2 and 57.14% of SCA3, gross ophthalmoplegia was observed in none of the SCA patients as was suggested by Chakraborty et al., in their study. SCA6 is highly frequent in Japan (11%)[23] and Taiwan (10.8%),[28] whereas this is relatively less common in Caucasians (5%).[23] Interestingly, no case of SCA 6 has been reported from mainland China before Jiang et al.,[29] reported SCA6 in four families. Basu et al.,[10] reported one family with SCA6 from India. We have found 6 (13.33 %) patients of SCA6 in this present study. SCA12 was initially reported in an American family of German descent but most of the other families have been reported from Indian subcontinent. Srivastava et al.,[16] and Fujigasaki et al.,[30] reported cases of SCA12 from India, whereas we found only one case of SCA12 in our study.

Conclusion

In our study, SCA2 outnumbered other varieties, when only ethnic Bengalees were not considered in the study. To the best of our knowledge, the largest number of patients from Eastern India was recruited in this study till date. There was significant overlap of clinical signs among different SCA types. No clinical sign could be found exclusive for any particular type of SCA. We also observed significant difference in phenotypical expression among individuals with same number of CAG repeats.

Limitations

The limitations in our study were the lack of primers for the detection of other varieties of SCAs. That is the reason we could not find the genetic locus in 38 out of 83 cases studied in our series, which thus remain as “unidentified”. Additionally, sequencing or capillary electrophoresis based sizing analysis could not be carried out for lack of facilities in our center for identical reasons. We could not carry out graphic recordings of slow eye movements and present them in our paper.
  26 in total

1.  Founder haplotype for Machado-Joseph disease in the Indian population: novel insights from history and polymorphism studies.

Authors:  Uma Mittal; Achal K Srivastava; Satish Jain; Sanjeev Jain; Mitali Mukerji
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2005-04

2.  Spinocerebellar ataxias in the Netherlands: prevalence and age at onset variance analysis.

Authors:  B P C van de Warrenburg; R J Sinke; C C Verschuuren-Bemelmans; H Scheffer; E R Brunt; P F Ippel; J A Maat-Kievit; D Dooijes; N C Notermans; D Lindhout; N V A M Knoers; H P H Kremer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Insights into the mutational history and prevalence of SCA1 in the Indian population through anchored polymorphisms.

Authors:  Uma Mittal; Sangeeta Sharma; Rupali Chopra; Kalladka Dheeraj; Pramod Kr Pal; Achal K Srivastava; Mitali Mukerji
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Mainland China: molecular and clinical features in four families.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Beisha Tang; Kun Xia; Yongxin Zhou; Bo Xu; Guohua Zhao; Haiyan Li; Lu Shen; Qian Pan; Fang Cai
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  Adult onset spinocerebellar ataxia in a Canadian movement disorders clinic.

Authors:  Scott Kraft; Sarah Furtado; Ranjit Ranawaya; Jillian Parboosingh; Stacey Bleoo; Karen McElligott; Peter Bridge; Sian Spacey; Shyamal Das; Oksana Suchowersky
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Analysis of CAG repeats in SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7 and DRPLA loci in spinocerebellar ataxia patients and distribution of CAG repeats at the SCA1, SCA2 and SCA6 loci in nine ethnic populations of eastern India.

Authors:  P Basu; B Chattopadhyay; P K Gangopadhaya; S C Mukherjee; K K Sinha; S K Das; S Roychoudhury; P P Majumder; N P Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Analysis of spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6, dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, and Friedreich's ataxia genes in spinocerebellar ataxia patients in the UK.

Authors:  J Leggo; A Dalton; P J Morrison; A Dodge; M Connarty; M J Kotze; D C Rubinsztein
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  High prevalence of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 in an ethnic Tamil community in India.

Authors:  R Rengaraj; M Dhanaraj; T Arulmozhi; B Chattopadhyay; N P Battacharyya
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Frequency analysis and clinical characterization of spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 in Korean patients.

Authors:  Won Yong Lee; Dong Kyu Jin; Myung Ryurl Oh; Ji Eun Lee; Seng Mi Song; Eun Ah Lee; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Jin Sang Chung; Kwang Ho Lee
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2003-06

10.  Spinocerebellar ataxias: genotype-phenotype correlations in 104 Brazilian families.

Authors:  Hélio A G Teive; Renato P Munhoz; Walter O Arruda; Iscia Lopes-Cendes; Salmo Raskin; Lineu C Werneck; Tetsuo Ashizawa
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinical Characterization of Genetically Diagnosed Cases of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12 from India.

Authors:  Supriyo Choudhury; Sayan Chatterjee; Koustav Chatterjee; Rebecca Banerjee; Jonathan Humby; Banashree Mondal; Sidharth S Anand; Shantanu Shubham; Hrishikesh Kumar
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2017-11-01

2.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in eastern India: Some new observations.

Authors:  Kalyan B Bhattacharyya; Debabrata Pulai; Deb Shankar Guin; Goutam Ganguly; Anindita Joardar; Sarnava Roy; Saurabh Rai; Atanu Biswas; Alok Pandit; Arijit Roy; Asit Kumar Senapati
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.383

3.  Evaluation of Various Movement Disorders in Patients of Genetically Proven Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India.

Authors:  Divya M Radhakrishnan; Vinay Goyal; Achal Kumar Srivastava; Garima Shukla; Madhuri Behari
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.383

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.