| Literature DB >> 25505903 |
Mingfeng Zhu1, Jianqiang Du1, Chenghua Ding2.
Abstract
Tongue image with coating is of important clinical diagnostic meaning, but traditional tongue image extraction method is not competent for extraction of tongue image with thick coating. In this paper, a novel method is suggested, which applies multiobjective greedy rules and makes fusion of color and space information in order to extract tongue image accurately. A comparative study of several contemporary tongue image extraction methods is also made from the aspects of accuracy and efficiency. As the experimental results show, geodesic active contour is quite slow and not accurate, the other 3 methods achieve fairly good segmentation results except in the case of the tongue with thick coating, our method achieves ideal segmentation results whatever types of tongue images are, and efficiency of our method is acceptable for the application of quantitative check of tongue image.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25505903 PMCID: PMC4258337 DOI: 10.1155/2014/534507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biomed Imaging ISSN: 1687-4188
Figure 1RGB color model.
Figure 2HSI color model.
Figure 3Grayscale image of tongue.
Figure 4Grayscale histogram of tongue.
Figure 5Hue image of tongue.
Figure 6Hue histogram of tongue.
Figure 7Hue image after transformation.
Figure 8Hue histogram after transformation.
Figure 9Result comparisons of 4 kinds of tongue image extraction methods. (a) Light red tongue image. (b) Manual segmentation result of light red tongue. (c) Segmentation result of light red tongue image by geodesic active contour. (d) Extraction result of light red tongue by the method mentioned in [21]. (e) Extraction result of light red tongue by the method mentioned in [22]. (f) Extraction result of light red tongue by our method. (g) Light white tongue image. (h) Manual segmentation result of light white tongue. (i) Segmentation result of light white tongue by geodesic active contour. (j) Extraction result of light white tongue by the method mentioned in [21]. (k) Extraction result of light white tongue by the method mentioned in [22]. (l) Extraction result of light white tongue by our method. (m) Red tongue image. (n) Manual segmentation result of red tongue. (o) Segmentation result of red tongue by geodesic active contour. (p) Extraction result of red tongue by the method mentioned in [21]. (q) Extraction result of red tongue by the method mentioned in [22]. (r) Extraction result of red tongue by our method. (s) Deep red tongue image. (t) Manual segmentation result of deep red tongue. (u) Segmentation result of deep red tongue by geodesic active contour. (v) Extraction result of deep red tongue by the method mentioned in [21]. (w) Extraction result of deep red tongue by the method mentioned in [22]. (x) Extraction result of deep red tongue by our method. (y) Purple tongue image. (z) Manual segmentation result of purple tongue. (aa) Segmentation result of purple tongue by geodesic active contour. (bb) Extraction result of purple tongue by the method mentioned in [21]. (cc) Extraction result of purple tongue by the method mentioned in [22]. (dd) Extraction result of purple tongue by our method. (ee) Tongue image with thick white coating. (ff) Manual segmentation result of tongue with thick white coating. (gg) Segmentation result of tongue with thick white coating by geodesic active contour. (hh) Extraction result of tongue with thick white coating by the method mentioned in [21]. (ii) Extraction result of tongue with thick white coating by the method mentioned in [22]. (jj) Extraction result of tongue with thick white coating by our method. (kk) Tongue image with thick yellow coating. (ll) Manual segmentation result of tongue with thick yellow coating. (mm) Segmentation result of tongue with thick yellow coating by geodesic active contour. (nn) Extraction result of tongue with thick yellow coating by the method mentioned in [21]. (oo) Extraction result of tongue with thick yellow coating by the method mentioned in [22]. (pp) Extraction result of tongue with thick yellow coating by our method.
Recognition rates of 4 kinds of tongue image extraction methods.
| Method | Light red tongue | Light white tongue | Red tongue | Deep red tongue | Purple tongue | Tongue with thick white coating | Tongue with thick yellow coating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geodesic active contour | 94.53% | 89.16% | 71.81% | 56.98% | 66.81% | 83.58% | 61.23% |
| Method based on mathematical morphology and HSI | 95.34% | 95.71% | 88.01% | 96.48% | 82.99% | 67.88% | 5.61% |
| Method based on sequential algorithm and HSI | 92.28% | 93.15% | 96.07% | 90.23% | 92.45% | 95.60% | 72.18% |
| Our method with fusion of color and space information | 93.20% | 95.66% | 95.14% | 91.43% | 92.02% | 93.01% | 83.89% |
Error rates of 4 kinds of tongue image extraction methods.
| Method | Light red tongue | Light white tongue | Red tongue | Deep red tongue | Purple tongue | Tongue with thick white coating | Tongue with thick yellow coating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geodesic active contour | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 2.26% | 0.00% |
| Method based on mathematical morphology and HSI | 0.88% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Method based on sequential algorithm and HSI | 0.13% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 2.03% | 37.05% |
| Our method with fusion of color and space information | 0.04% | 1.17% | 0.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.00% |
Efficiency comparisons of 4 kinds of tongue image extraction methods.
| Method | Light red tongue | Light white tongue | Red tongue | Deep red tongue | Purple tongue | Tongue with thick white coating | Tongue with thick yellow coating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geodesic active contour | 406.625 seconds | 441.688 seconds | 445.641 seconds | 447.125 seconds | 468.000 seconds | 340.922 seconds | 548.750 seconds |
|
| |||||||
| Method based on mathematical morphology and HSI | 0.297 seconds | 0.313 seconds | 0.297 seconds | 0.313 seconds | 0.297 seconds | 0.312 seconds | 0.234 seconds |
|
| |||||||
| Method based on sequential algorithm and HSI | 0.484 seconds | 0.156 seconds | 0.171 seconds | 0.157 seconds | 0.172 seconds | 0.157 seconds | 0.172 seconds |
|
| |||||||
| Our method with fusion of color and space information | 14.969 seconds | 22.062 seconds | 25.375 seconds | 18.906 seconds | 25.921 seconds | 56.829 seconds | 15.063 seconds |