Muhammad Khalil Khan1, Syed Akhtar Hussain Bokhari2, Abdul Haleem3, Abdul Kareem4, Ayyaz Ali Khan4, Tasleem Hosein5, Muhammad Usama Khan6. 1. Department of Periodontology & Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, KSA ; Department of Periodontology & Oral Medicine, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, KSA. 2. University Medical & Dental College, Faisalabad, Pakistan. 3. Department of Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, KSA. 4. Department of Oral Health Sciences, Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute Lahore, Pakistan. 5. Department of Operative Dentistry, Fatima Jinnah Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan. 6. Liaquat College of Medicine & Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of a commercially available toothpowder was compared with toothpaste in removing extrinsic dental stains. METHODS: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 77 volunteers were included from a residential professional college. All study subjects (control toothpaste users and test toothpowder users) plaque control measures. All study subjects were instructed to rinse with 5 ml 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 1 minute, twice and one cup of double tea bag solution three times daily for three weeks. Subjects were randomized into test (n=36) and control (n=36) groups. Toothpaste (control) and toothpowder (test) was used for two weeks to see the effects on removing stains on the labial surfaces of 12 anterior teeth. For measuring dental extrinsic stains Lobene Stain Index (SI) was used. RESULTS: The amount of stain following the use of toothpaste and toothpowder was more controlled with the experimental toothpowder. For all sites combined, there was evidence that the experimental toothpowder was significantly superior to toothpaste in reducing stain area (p<.001), stain intensity (p<.001) and composite/product (area × intensity) (p<.001). CONCLUSION:Stain removing efficacy of toothpowder was significantly higher as compared with toothpaste. A toothpowder may be expected to be of benefit in controlling and removing extrinsic dental staining.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of a commercially available toothpowder was compared with toothpaste in removing extrinsic dental stains. METHODS: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 77 volunteers were included from a residential professional college. All study subjects (control toothpaste users and test toothpowder users) plaque control measures. All study subjects were instructed to rinse with 5 ml 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 1 minute, twice and one cup of double tea bag solution three times daily for three weeks. Subjects were randomized into test (n=36) and control (n=36) groups. Toothpaste (control) and toothpowder (test) was used for two weeks to see the effects on removing stains on the labial surfaces of 12 anterior teeth. For measuring dental extrinsic stains Lobene Stain Index (SI) was used. RESULTS: The amount of stain following the use of toothpaste and toothpowder was more controlled with the experimental toothpowder. For all sites combined, there was evidence that the experimental toothpowder was significantly superior to toothpaste in reducing stain area (p<.001), stain intensity (p<.001) and composite/product (area × intensity) (p<.001). CONCLUSION: Stain removing efficacy of toothpowder was significantly higher as compared with toothpaste. A toothpowder may be expected to be of benefit in controlling and removing extrinsic dental staining.
Authors: Stefan Baumgartner; Thomas Imfeld; Olivier Schicht; Christian Rath; Rigmor E Persson; G Rutger Persson Journal: J Periodontol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.993