Literature DB >> 25505841

DNA barcoding in Atlantic Forest plants: What is the best marker for Sapotaceae species identification?

Caio Vinicius Vivas1, Ramiris César Souza Moraes1, Anderson Alves-Araújo2, Marccus Alves3, Eduardo Mariano-Neto4, Cássio van den Berg5, Fernanda Amato Gaiotto1.   

Abstract

The Atlantic Forest is a phytogeographic domain with a high rate of endemism and large species diversity. The Sapotaceae is a botanical family for which species identification in the Atlantic Forest is difficult. An approach that facilitates species identification in the Sapotaceae is urgently needed because this family includes threatened species and valuable timber species. In this context, DNA barcoding could provide an important tool for identifying species in the Atlantic Forest. In this work, we evaluated four plant barcode markers (matK, rbcL, trnH-psbA and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region - ITS) in 80 samples from 26 species of Sapotaceae that occur in the Atlantic Forest. ITS yielded the highest average interspecific distance (0.122), followed by trnH-psbA (0.019), matK (0.008) and rbcL (0.002). For species discrimination, ITS provided the best results, followed by matK, trnH-psbA and rbcL. Furthermore, the combined analysis of two, three or four markers did not result in higher rates of discrimination than obtained with ITS alone. These results indicate that the ITS region is the best option for molecular identification of Sapotaceae species from the Atlantic Forest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  internal transcribed spacer; taxonomy; tree species; tropical forest

Year:  2014        PMID: 25505841      PMCID: PMC4261966          DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572014005000019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

Tropical regions harbor a substantial portion of the worlds biodiversity and some of the most diverse and threatened biomes on the planet. The Atlantic Forest is the second largest tropical forest in South America, with an original coverage of ~1.5 million km2, of which only 11.4–16% remains (Ribeiro ). The Atlantic Forest is considered a hotspot of biodiversity (Myers ) and it is comprised of highly diverse plants, with 16,146 species recorded, of which 7,524 are endemic (Forzza ). Among the taxa that occur in the Atlantic Forest and have difficulties for species identification stands the Sapotaceae. This family consists of 53 genera and approximately 1,250 species with a pantropical distribution, most of which are found in tropical rainforests (Pennington, 1990). Many Sapotaceae species provide economically important products such as latex (used in the production of chewing gum), wood and fruits for human consumption (Pennington, 1990). Several species in this family also provide important resources for the animal biota, such as the golden-headed lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) that relies on some Sapotaceae species for food and shelter (Oliveira ). The phenomena of supra-annual flowering and vegetative intraspecific morphological variation mean that flower and fruit analysis is necessary for correct identification of many Sapotaceae species. However, obtaining specimens with intact floral structures is not always possible because of the ephemeral nature of flowers from some species (Terra-Araujo ). Therefore, additional methods, e.g., molecular tools, need to be developed to assist in traditional identification. In this context, the DNA barcode, which is the use of short genomic regions that are standardized for quick, accurate species identification (Hebert ), has helped in molecular identification in several plant groups. This method is beneficial to ecologists and conservationists by allowing for the identification of samples when the use of traditional methods would be impossible (Hebert and Gregory, 2005). A portion of the CO1 gene has been used successfully in the molecular identification of animal species (Hebert ). With regard to plant species, the rbcL and matK markers are recommended as DNA barcodes (CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009). However, these markers do not have good discriminatory power in some taxa (Du ; Guo ; Zhang ); therefore, the use of additional markers, such as the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and trnH-psbA, is required. Li proposed use of the ITS/ITS2 between regions that are formally recognized for their applicability in the molecular identification of seed plants, thereby highlighting the relevance of this marker. The ITS region is a good marker for phylogenetic studies in Sapotaceae (Bartish ; Swenson , 2008), and Gonzalez indicated that the ITS can be helpful in the identification of species in this family. However, the efficiency of different barcode markers for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species has not been widely tested. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of the plastid markers matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA and the nuclear ribosomal ITS region for the identification of Sapotaceae species from the Atlantic Forest.

Materials and Methods

Fourteen Atlantic Forest fragments were sampled in the Brazilian state of Bahia (Figure 1). Eighty individuals representing 26 Sapotaceae species were collected (1–7 samples per species). All of the samples were identified to species level and voucher specimens were deposited in the CEPEC (Herbário do Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau) or ALCB (Herbário Alexandre Leal Costa) Herbaria (Table S1).
Figure 1

Geographical location of sampling sites. 1 – Amargosa, 2 – Valença, 3 – Nilo Peçanha, 4 – Reserva Ecológica da Michelin - Igrapiúna, 5 – Jequié, 6 – Camamu, 7 – RPPN Capitão - Itacaré, 8 – Parque Estadual da Serra do Conduru - Uruçuca, 9 – Almadina, 10 –Parque Municipal da Boa Esperança - Ilhéus, 11 – RPPN Mãe da Mata - Ilhéus, 12 – Estrada Olivença - Vila Brasil - Ilhéus, 13 – Reserva Biológica de Una - Una, 14 – RPPN Estação Veracel - Porto Seguro.

Geographical location of sampling sites. 1 – Amargosa, 2 – Valença, 3 – Nilo Peçanha, 4 – Reserva Ecológica da Michelin - Igrapiúna, 5 – Jequié, 6 – Camamu, 7 – RPPN Capitão - Itacaré, 8 – Parque Estadual da Serra do Conduru - Uruçuca, 9 – Almadina, 10 –Parque Municipal da Boa Esperança - Ilhéus, 11 – RPPN Mãe da Mata - Ilhéus, 12 – Estrada Olivença - Vila Brasil - Ilhéus, 13 – Reserva Biológica de Una - Una, 14 – RPPN Estação Veracel - Porto Seguro. DNA was extracted according to the protocol established by Doyle and Doyle (1987) using approximately 50 mg of leaf tissue from each sample. Two recommended markers (matK and rbcL) and two suggested markers used as additional barcode markers for land plants (ITS and trnH-psbA) were amplified (Table 1). For PCR amplification of ITS, matK and rbcL the reaction mixture consisted of 1x buffer (GoTaq, Promega), dNTPs (0.2 mM), primers(0.5 μM each), bovine serum albumin (BSA; 0.1 mg/mL), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (GoTaq, Promega), DNA (10 ng) and ultra-pure water to a final volume of 20 μL. For matK and rbcL, the following PCR program was used: 94 °C for 2 min 30 s followed by 10 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s and 25 cycles at 88 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s with an additional cycle at 72 °C for 10 min (Elisa Suganuma pers. comm.). For the ITS region, the conditions used were: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 90 s with an additional cycle at 72 °C for 8 min (Bartish ). For trnH-psbA amplification, the PCR mix consisted of 1x buffer (GoTaq, Promega), dNTPs (0.2 mM), primers (0.5 μM each), BSA (0.375 mg/mL), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (GoTaq, Promega), DNA (10 ng) and ultra-pure water to a final volume of 15 μL. The PCR program consisted of 94 °C for 2.5 min followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s and 64 °C for 1 min with an additional cycle at 64 °C for 10 min. Samples that showed weak band patterns were amplified using a Top Taq Master Mix kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and using the same amplification programs described above. The PCR products were purified by precipitation with polyethylene glycol (10% PEG 8000, 2.5 M NaCl) and sequenced in both directions using a Big Dye Terminator kit, version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI 3130XL automated sequencer.
Table 1

Primers used in PCR and sequencing.

RegionPrimerSequence 5′–3′Reference
ITSITS-18SF1GAACCTTATCGTTTAGAGGAAGGRydin et al. (2004)
ITS-26SR1CCGCCAGATTTTCAGGCTGGGCRydin et al. (2004)
ITSITS42TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGCWhite et al. (1990)
ITS52GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGGWhite et al. (1990)
matK3F_KIM fCGTACAGTACTTTTGTGTTTACGAGKJ Kim, unpublished
1R_KIM rACCCAGTCCATCTGGAAATCTTGGTTCKJ Kim, unpublished
rbcLrbcLa_fATGTCACCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGCKress and Erickson (2007)
rbcLaj634RGAAACGGTCTCTCCAACGCATFazekas et al. (2008)
trnH- psbAtrnHf_05CGCGCATGGTGGATTCACAATCCTate and Simpson (2003)
psbA3 fGTTATGCATGAACGTAATGCTCSang et al. (1997)

Primers used in amplification reactions of the ITS region;

Primers used in sequencing reactions of the ITS region.

Primers used in PCR and sequencing. Primers used in amplification reactions of the ITS region; Primers used in sequencing reactions of the ITS region. The sequences were edited using the Staden package (Staden ) and submitted to GenBank (Table S1). The alignment was done using Muscle (Edgar, 2004) in conjunction with the Mega5 program (Tamura ). All of the sequences were examined visually for possible errors in editing and alignment, and manual adjustments were made when necessary. The success of the PCR and sequencing was assessed according to Li . Pairwise distances were calculated in Mega5 (Tamura ) using the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) to assess intra- and inter-species differences. We compared the interspecific pairwise divergences between species for single and combined analyses with different markers, using permutation procedures for comparison between means with 10,000 permutations. To evaluate species discrimination, the criteria “Best Match” and “Best Close Match” implemented in the program TaxonDNA (Meier ) and neighbor-joining analyses (Saitou and Nei, 1987) were done using single or different combinations of regions. Combined analyses were done only for samples in which the four regions were successfully sequenced. Only species for which multiple specimens were sequenced were used for the analyses in TaxonDNA and the threshold for “Best Close Match” was calculated for each region (single and combined analyses) using the “Pairwise Summary” function. In neighbor-joining (NJ) analyses, the successful discrimination of species was assessed by considering the specific monophyletic groups for species for which multiple specimens were sequenced and that showed bootstrap values ≥70%. The NJ analyses were done in Mega5 (Tamura ) using the Kimura 2-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) and pairwise-deletion for indels. Internal support for the branches was calculated using the bootstrap method with 1000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985).

Results

Seventy-two ITS sequences were obtained for 24 Sapotaceae species, 78 matK sequences for 26 species, 80 rbcL sequences for 26 species and 69 trnH-psbA sequences for 25 species of Sapotaceae. The primers for these markers displayed high amplification rates for Sapotaceae (Table 2). In the sequencing reactions, rbcL and matK gave the best results, followed by ITS and trnH-psbA. All of the markers produced matrices > 500 bp in size after the sequences were aligned. Indels were found for ITS, matK and trnH-psbA (Table 2). In the interspecific pairwise comparisons (single and combined analyses), the ITS region was the most divergent and the rbcL region the least divergent (p < 0.01) (Figure S1 and Table S2). The average inter-specific distance calculated based on the ITS region was 40 times greater than the intraspecific distance. The overlap between intra- and interspecific distances in plastid markers was quite pronounced, whereas in ITS these distances were not pronounced. Figure 2 shows the genetic comparisons of the intra- and interspecific divergences.
Table 2

Evaluation of four genomic markers for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species.

ParameterMarker

ITSmatKrbcLtrnH-psbA
PCR success97.5%98.8%100%100%
Sequencing success92.3%98.7%100%86.3%
Aligned sequence length (bp)687789586691
Indels1–33 bp6 bp01–156 bp
Number of variable sites321411361
Mean intraspecific K2P distance (range)0.003 (0 to 0.038)0.0004 (0 to 0.003)0.0005 (0 to 0.007)0.001 (0 to 0.008)
Mean interspecific K2P distance (range)0.122 (0.005 to 0.174)0.008 (0 to 0.019)0.002 (0 to 0.009)0.019 (0 to 0.047)
Figure 2

Relative distribution of intraspecific (A) and interspecific (B) Kimura 2-parameter distances for ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA. Y-axes = relative distribution (%).

Evaluation of four genomic markers for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species. Relative distribution of intraspecific (A) and interspecific (B) Kimura 2-parameter distances for ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA. Y-axes = relative distribution (%). For identification at the species level, the ITS performed the best among all of the markers tested (Table 3). The matK had the second best performance, followed by trnH-psbA and rbcL. In the combined analyses, none of the combinations outperformed the ITS in single analyses. Combinations involving ITS showed the same performance, whereas the matK/rbcL combination proposed by CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) performed poorly (Table 3).
Table 3

Success of species identification based on individual and combined analyses of ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA markers.

Neighbor-joiningA (%)Best matchB (%)Best close matchB (%)


CorrectAmbiguousIncorrectCorrectAmbiguousIncorrectNo matchThreshold
Single analyses
ITS81.3 (13/16)100 (64/64)0095.3 (61/64)004.7 (3/64)1.09
matK23.5 (4/17)47.8 (33/69)52.2 (36/69)047.8 (33/69)52.2 (36/69)000.25
rbcL0 (0/17)36.6 (26/71)63.4 (45/71)036.6 (26/71)63.4 (45/71)000.51
trnH-psbA21.4 (3/14)41.4 (24/58)48.3 (28/58)10.3 (6/58)41.4 (24/58)46.6 (27/58)10.3 (6/58)1.7 (1/58)0.58
Combined analyses
ITS+matK78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.65
ITS+rbcL78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.76
ITS+trnH-psbA78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.80
matK+rbcL28.6 (4/14)51.8 (29/56)48.2 (27/56)050 (28/56)46.4 (26/56)03.6 (2/56)0.14
matK+trnH-psbA35.7 (5/14)55.4 (31/56)37.5 (21/56)7.1 (4/56)55.4 (31/56)35.7 (20/56)7.1 (4/56)1.8 (1/56)0.23
rbcL+trnH-psbA21.4 (3/14)58.9 (33/56)37.5 (21/56)3.6 (2/56)57.1 (32/56)35.7 (20/56)3.6 (2/56)3.6 (2/56)0.27
ITS+matK+rbcL78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.45
ITS+matK+trnH-psbA78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.47
ITS+rbcL +trnH-psbA78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.52
matK+rbcL+trnH-psbA28.6 (4/14)57.1 (32/56)39.3 (22/56)3.6 (2/56)53.5 (30/56)39.3 (22/56)3.6 (2/56)3.6 (2/56)0.16
ITS+matK+rbcL+trnH-psbA78.6 (11/14)100 (56/56)0094.6 (53/56)005.4 (3/56)0.36

Monophyletic groups for species with multiple specimens sequenced using bootstrap values ≥70%. Values in parentheses indicate the number of species identified using neighbor-joining analyses.

Values in parentheses indicate the number of samples identified using “Best Match” and “Best Close Match”.

Success of species identification based on individual and combined analyses of ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA markers. Monophyletic groups for species with multiple specimens sequenced using bootstrap values ≥70%. Values in parentheses indicate the number of species identified using neighbor-joining analyses. Values in parentheses indicate the number of samples identified using “Best Match” and “Best Close Match”. Based on NJ analyses, the ITS identified the following species: Chrysophyllum splendens, Diploon cuspidatum, Ecclinusa ramiflora, Manilkara longifolia, M. salzmannii, Micropholis crassipedicellata, M. gardneriana, M. guyanensis, Pouteria bangii, P. glauca, P. macahensis, P. reticulata and Pradosia lactescens, representing 13 monophyletic groups that were supported by high bootstrap values (Figure 3). Only Manilkara maxima, M. multifida, Pouteria caimito and P. guianensis were not discriminated using this phylogenetic method (Figure 3). The species Pouteria cuspidata, P. egreria, P. durlandii, P. grandiflora and Micropholis venulosa showed high levels of divergence and were distinct from other Sapotaceae species for which multiple specimens were analyzed (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Neighbor-joining tree based on analysis of the ITS region. The numbers above the nodes correspond to bootstrap values > 50%. The scale indicates the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance.

Neighbor-joining tree based on analysis of the ITS region. The numbers above the nodes correspond to bootstrap values > 50%. The scale indicates the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance.

Discussion

The successful discrimination of plant species using the regions proposed for DNA barcoding by CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) may vary in plants (Hollingsworth ; Newmaster and Ragupathy, 2009; Zhang ). Depending on the taxon in question, the use of additional markers may be needed for discrimination (CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009). This is particularly relevant to the Sapotaceae, in which the plastid markers do not have particularly good resolution. Despite having a lower performance than matK and rbcL in sequencing reactions, the ITS showed high specific resolution. Desirable features for DNA barcoding include the universality of primers, success in sequencing, and species discrimination (Kress ; CBOL Plant Working Group, 2009; Hollingsworth ). In this work, all of the tested markers showed high rates of amplification. With regard to the sequences obtained, the rbcL marker was the most effective, supporting the findings of Ren and Gu . This result was closely matched by matK, which failed in only one sample. Importantly, we observed that the lower performance of trnH-psbA compared to the other markers resulted from the difficulty in sequencing this marker in Sapotaceae, probably because of the presence of mononucleotide repeats (> 10 bp) that undermined the sequencing reactions. Devey reported the occurrence of these repeats in many species and demonstrated how these microsatellites interfere in obtaining high quality sequences, exactly as observed here. For ITS, the success rate for sequencing was reasonable but lower than for the matK and rbcL markers. However, the ITS was highly discriminatory and useful for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species. The most desirable characteristic of DNA barcoding is successful species discrimination. Based on this criterion, the ITS was useful in the Sapotaceae because of its high interspecific distances and low values in intraspecific comparisons. In addition, the ITS region showed little overlap between the intra- and interspecific Kimura 2-parameter distances, culminating in high specific resolution. NJ analyses showed that only four species (M. maxima, M. multifida, P. caimito and P. guianensis) were not identified using ITS-derived data. This result suggests recent divergence beyond retaining ancestral polymorphisms for the ITS in original populations and may limit its usefulness for species identification in these cases. In addition, low rates of divergence may be observed in some groups of tree species because of the long generation time, resulting in lower rates of mutation (Kay ). Manilkara salzmannii showed great phenotypic plasticity in vegetative characters despite high values of intra-specific divergence. The high values of intraspecific divergence observed in P. reticulata, coupled with the large phenotypic plasticity of its vegetative characters, suggests that this group may represent a complex of species, but this hypothesis requires further studies. The species Chromolucuma apiculata and Pouteria gardneri (both sustained based on morphological characters) showed very low divergence (0.5%), indicating that they may belong to the same genus; this could reflect homoplasy in the morphological characters used to delimit the genus Chromolucuma. In a preliminary analysis of a portion of the ITS region, Yoccoz reported that this region was more efficient in discriminating Sapotaceae species than plastid markers. Furthermore, Gonzalez indicated the potential of ITS for molecular identification of Sapotaceae species in the Amazon region. Our results corroborate those of Ren for Alnus spp., Yan for Primula spp., Guo for Hedyotis spp., and Du for Potamogetonaceae. In these studies, the ITS region showed good discrimination of species. For example, Singh reported a specific resolution of 100% using samples of the genus Dendrobium, indicating that in some cases this region alone is sufficient for the molecular identification of plant species. The plastid markers trnH-psbA, matK and rbcL had a weaker performance compared with ITS alone, with low interspecific distances, and overlaps with intraspecific distances (Figure 2). For example, in Manilkara, no species were identified with these markers. The low success in identifying species using plastid markers limits their usefulness for molecular identification in Sapotaceae. This result can be explained by the low mutation rate observed for this genome compared with the nuclear genome (Wolfe ). In the combined analyses, the combination proposed by CBOL (matK+rbcL) performed poorly as a plant barcode, as did other combinations that did not include the ITS. Combined analyses using ITS worked successfully but were never superior to the individual ITS analyses. This finding further strengthens the potential usefulness of ITS by itself as a plant barcode for future work with Sapotaceae. Taxonomic status is an essential consideration in adopting the appropriate conservation strategies and management plan for a given species. The use of the ITS by itself for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species provides new opportunities for studies involving species of this family, with the possibility of easier and faster identification from sterile material. In view of estimates that > 50% of the species in this family are not yet known to science (Joppa ), this technique may help troubleshoot specific taxonomic problems and be useful in the initial screening of potential new species for further taxonomic characterization. Based on the results of this study, we suggest the ITS region as the best option for the molecular identification of Sapotaceae species in the Atlantic Forest, and highlight the potential of this marker for the identification of other species of this family. The use of an integrated taxonomic approach for studying the Sapotaceae should help uncover the hidden diversity in this family.

Supplementary Material

The following online material is available for this article: Figure S1 - Boxplot of K2P distances between the Sapotaceae species considered in this study using ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA markers. Table S1 - Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for Sapotaceae species from the Atlantic Forest in southern Bahia. Table S2 - Significance of pairwise comparisons for single and combined analyses with ITS, matK, rbcL and trnH-psbA,using interspecific pairwise K2P distances, obtained from the Sapotaceae species used in this study. This material is available as part of the online article from http://www.scielo.br/gmb.
  29 in total

1.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.

Authors:  N Myers; R A Mittermeier; C G Mittermeier; G A da Fonseca; J Kent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  On the evolutionary history of Ephedra: Cretaceous fossils and extant molecules.

Authors:  Catarina Rydin; Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen; Else Marie Friis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 15.683

7.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.

Authors:  Rudolf Meier; Kwong Shiyang; Gaurav Vaidya; Peter K L Ng
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants.

Authors:  W John Kress; Kenneth J Wurdack; Elizabeth A Zimmer; Lee A Weigt; Daniel H Janzen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A survey of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer substitution rates across angiosperms: an approximate molecular clock with life history effects.

Authors:  Kathleen M Kay; Justen B Whittall; Scott A Hodges
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region.

Authors:  W John Kress; David L Erickson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Can plant DNA barcoding be implemented in species-rich tropical regions? A perspective from São Paulo State, Brazil.

Authors:  Renato A Ferreira de Lima; Alexandre Adalardo de Oliveira; Gabriel Dalla Colletta; Thiago Bevilacqua Flores; Rubens L Gayoso Coelho; Pedro Dias; Gabriel Ponzoni Frey; Amaia Iribar; Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues; Vinícius Castro Souza; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2018 Jul/Sept.       Impact factor: 1.771

2.  Revisiting the hyperdominance of Neotropical tree species under a taxonomic, functional and evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Gabriel Damasco; Christopher Baraloto; Alberto Vicentini; Douglas C Daly; Bruce G Baldwin; Paul V A Fine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Challenges in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants DNA Barcoding-Lessons from the Lamiaceae.

Authors:  Nazia Nazar; Caroline Howard; Adrian Slater; Tiziana Sgamma
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05

4.  ITS and trnH-psbA as Efficient DNA Barcodes to Identify Threatened Commercial Woody Angiosperms from Southern Brazilian Atlantic Rainforests.

Authors:  Mônica Bolson; Eric de Camargo Smidt; Marcelo Leandro Brotto; Viviane Silva-Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Pragmatic Applications and Universality of DNA Barcoding for Substantial Organisms at Species Level: A Review to Explore a Way Forward.

Authors:  Sarfraz Ahmed; Muhammad Ibrahim; Chanin Nantasenamat; Muhammad Farrukh Nisar; Aijaz Ahmad Malik; Rashem Waheed; Muhammad Z Ahmed; Suvash Chandra Ojha; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.