| Literature DB >> 25504140 |
Ahmet Türkoğlu1, Mesut Gül, Hatice Kurt Yuksel, Ulas Alabalik, Burak Veli Ülger, Omer Uslukaya, Yahya Avci.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of curcumin on adhesion formation in a rat cecum abrasion model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25504140 PMCID: PMC5588192 DOI: 10.1159/000369020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Princ Pract ISSN: 1011-7571 Impact factor: 1.927
Distribution of adhesion scores and tissue hydroxyproline levels
| Sham group | Control group | Curcumin group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adhesion scores | |||
| Grade 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| Grade 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Grade 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hydroxyproline levels | 48.3 ± 11.8 | 85.7 ± 22.1 | 63.8 ± 13.9 |
Data are either number (n = 10 in each group) or mean ± SD (µg/mg). Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for the adhesion scores between the curcumin and control groups and for the hydroxyproline levels of the sham and curcumin groups compared to the control group.
Fig. 1A rat from the control group with peritoneal adhesion formation.
Fig. 2The histopathological scores in each group: those of the curcumin and sham groups were significantly lower than those of the control group (p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0001, respectively).
Fig. 3a An area representing grade 3 adhesion according to the microscopic classification system of Zühlke in a rat from the control group. b A nonadhesion area in a rat from the sham group. c An area representing grade 3 adhesion in a rat from the curcumin group. HE stain. Original magnification. a ×200.b, c ×100.