Literature DB >> 25503792

Confronting diminished epistemic privilege and epistemic injustice in pregnancy by challenging a "panoptics of the womb".

Lauren Freeman1.   

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how the problematic kinds of epistemic power that physicians have can diminish the epistemic privilege that pregnant women have over their bodies and can put them in a state of epistemic powerlessness. This result, I argue, constitutes an epistemic injustice for many pregnant women. A reconsideration of how we understand and care for pregnant women and of the physician-patient relationship can provide us with a valuable context and starting point for helping to alleviate the knowledge/power problems that are symptomatic of the current system and structure of medicine. I suggest that we can begin to confront this kind of injustice if medicine adopts a more phenomenological understanding of bodies and if physicians and patients--in this case, pregnant women--become what I call "epistemic peers."
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foucault; epistemic injustice; epistemic peers; epistemic privilege; phenomenology; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25503792     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhu046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  2 in total

1.  Epistemic Injustice in Incident Investigations: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Josje Kok; David de Kam; Ian Leistikow; Kor Grit; Roland Bal
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  "What gets measured better gets done better": The landscape of validation of global maternal and newborn health indicators through key informant interviews.

Authors:  Lenka Benova; Ann-Beth Moller; Allisyn C Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.