Literature DB >> 25503721

[Therapy of retroperitoneal fibrosis: functional therapeutic outcome].

A S Brandt1, S Kukuk, N M Dreger, E Müller, S Roth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most frequent complication of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is an extrinsic compression of the ureter resulting in hydronephrosis. Because of the rareness of this uncommon chronic inflammatory disease, therapeutic results concerning the treatment of the obstructive uropathy are often known only for small study groups.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Else Kröner-Fresenius registry is a nationwide register of patients suffering from RPF in which all disease-related data are prospectively recorded. We performed a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome of different therapy strategies for all patients who underwent standardized treatment in our department since 2007.
RESULTS: From April 2007 to January 2014 a total of 97 patients with RPF were treated in our department. The mean age was 54.9 years and the male to female ratio was 3.2:1 (74 males and 23 females). Assessment of 85 out of 97 cases revealed 78 patients and 118 renal units with hydronephrosis. Of these patients 46 received prednisolone, 35 patients tamoxifen and 4 patients a combination therapy. Successful removal of double J stents was possible in 49 out of the 78 cases (62.8%) and in 72 out of 118 renal units (61.0%). Of the patients 26.9% received final surgical treatment of ureter compression and 7.7% of patients were permanently treated with a double J stents. Patients treated with prednisolone were significantly younger (p=0.040) and decided for surgical therapy significantly earlier (p=0.041). Otherwise there were no differences in functional outcome of patients treated with either prednisolone or tamoxifen.
CONCLUSION: Removal of double J stents was possible in 63% of patients regardless of the medicinal approach to therapy, which supports the strategy of using medicinal treatment before the application of surgical solutions. Nevertheless, surgical interventions were necessary in more than 25% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25503721     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3712-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  30 in total

1.  Surgery for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis by ureterolysis and ureteric protection with a posterior pre-peritoneal fat flap.

Authors:  Cristóbal García Peñalver; A Tejido Sánchez; A Suárez Charneco; R Díaz González; A Rosino Sánchez; O Leiva Galvis
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Immunosuppressive therapy for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective analysis of 26 cases.

Authors:  Renzo Marcolongo; Ivan Matteo Tavolini; Francesco Laveder; Moira Busa; Franco Noventa; Pierfrancesco Bassi; Gianpietro Semenzato
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Ureteral substitution with reconfigured colon: long-term followup.

Authors:  D A Lazica; B Ubrig; A S Brandt; F C von Rundstedt; S Roth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Brief communication: tamoxifen therapy for nonmalignant retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Authors:  Eric F H van Bommel; Tadek R Hendriksz; Antonius W L C Huiskes; Antoine G M Zeegers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Associated findings and complications of retroperitoneal fibrosis in 204 patients: results of a urological registry.

Authors:  A S Brandt; L Kamper; S Kukuk; P Haage; S Roth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  Retroperitoneal fibrosis.

Authors:  Augusto Vaglio; Carlo Salvarani; Carlo Buzio
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Long-term renal and patient outcome in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis treated with prednisone.

Authors:  Eric F H van Bommel; Claire Siemes; Liesbeth E Hak; Sacha J van der Veer; Tadek R Hendriksz
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Ileal ureteric replacement in complex reconstruction of the urinary tract.

Authors:  R Bonfig; E W Gerharz; H Riedmiller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Steroid therapy for idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: dose and duration.

Authors:  A H Kardar; S Kattan; E Lindstedt; K Hanash
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a role for mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  R D Swartz; A M Lake; W W Roberts; G J Faerber; J S Wolf
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.975

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal fibrosis].

Authors:  A S Brandt; S Kukuk; N M Dreger; E Müller; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and PET-CT in the follow up of chronic periaortitis.

Authors:  L Kamper; N M Dreger; A S Brandt; T Pöppel; N Abanador-Kamper; S Roth; P Haage
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  [New (and old) aspects of retroperitoneal fibrosis].

Authors:  A S Brandt; N M Dreger; E Müller; S Kukuk; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.