Literature DB >> 25503600

Effectiveness and Safety of Transdermal Buprenorphine Versus Sustained-release Tramadol in Patients With Moderate to Severe Musculoskeletal Pain: An 8-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Noninferiority Study.

Xiaomei Leng1, Zhanguo Li, Houshan Lv, Yi Zheng, Yi Liu, Kerong Dai, Chen Yao, Xiaoyan Yan, Xiaofeng Zeng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this noninferiority study was to investigate clinical effectiveness and safety of buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in patients with moderate to severe musculoskeletal pain inadequately controlled with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, compared with sustained-release tramadol tablets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive low-dose 7-day BTDS (5, 10, and 20 μg/h, maximum dosage of 20 μg/h) or sustained-release tramadol tablets (100 mg, maximum dosage of 400 mg/d) over an 8-week double-blind treatment period (3-week titration, 5-week maintenance). The primary endpoint was the difference in the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores from baseline to treatment completion. Noninferiority was assumed if the treatment difference on the VAS scale was within ±1.5 cm, this threshold indicating a clinically meaningful result. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01476774.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty patients were randomized to BTDS (n=141) or to tramadol (n=139). Both treatments were associated with a significant reduction in pain by the end of the treatment. The least squares mean difference of the change from baseline in VAS scores between the BTDS and tramadol groups were 0.45 (95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.91), which was within the ±1.5 cm predefined threshold, indicating that the effectiveness of BTDS was not inferior to the effectiveness of sustained-release tramadol tablets. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the 2 treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that BTDS is a good therapeutic option for patients experiencing chronic musculoskeletal pain of moderate to severe intensity that is insufficiently controlled by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25503600     DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  6 in total

1.  To what extent are we confident that tapentadol induces less constipation and other side effects than the other opioids in chronic pain patients? a confidence evaluation in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrice Forget; Mathieu Vermeersch
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-08-03

Review 2.  Multimechanistic Single-Entity Combinations for Chronic Pain Control: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Joseph Pergolizzi; Peter Magnusson; Flaminia Coluzzi; Frank Breve; Jo Ann K LeQuang; Giustino Varrassi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 3.  Safety And Efficacy Of The Unique Opioid Buprenorphine For The Treatment Of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert B Raffa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Pain Control in Latin America: The Optimized Role of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Cancer and Noncancer Pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert Taylor; Jo Ann LeQuang; Argelia Lara; Andres Hernandez Ortiz; Miguel A Ruiz Iban
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 5.  Benefit-Risk Analysis of Buprenorphine for Pain Management.

Authors:  Martin Hale; Mark Garofoli; Robert B Raffa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Tolerability of Opioid Analgesia for Chronic Pain: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zengdong Meng; Jing Yu; Michael Acuff; Chong Luo; Sanrong Wang; Lehua Yu; Rongzhong Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.