Literature DB >> 25502528

Equal performance of self-collected and health care worker-collected pharyngeal swabs for group a streptococcus testing by PCR.

Martha A Murray1, Lorie A Schulz1, Joseph W Furst1, Jason H Homme2, Sarah M Jenkins3, James R Uhl4, Robin Patel4, Franklin C Cockerill4, Jane F Myers1, Bobbi S Pritt5.   

Abstract

A process employing patient- or parent-collected pharyngeal swabs for group A Streptococcus (GAS) testing would expedite diagnosis and treatment, reduce patient exposure to the health care setting, and decrease health care costs. Our aim was to determine the concordance between patient- or parent-collected (self-collected) and health care worker (HCW)-collected pharyngeal swabs for detection of GAS by PCR. From 9 October 2012 to 21 March 2013, patients presenting with a sore throat meeting criteria for GAS testing and not meeting criteria for severe disease were offered the opportunity to collect their own pharyngeal swab. The HCW also collected a swab. Paired swabs were tested by GAS real-time PCR, allowing semiquantitative comparisons between positive results. Of the 402 participants, 206 had a swab collected by the patient and 196 a swab collected by the parent. The percent positivity results were 33.3% for HCW-collected swabs and 34.3% for self-collected swabs (P = 0.41). The overall concordance between the two collection strategies was 94.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.3 to 96.0). Twenty-four of the paired swabs had discordant results, with 10 and 14 positives detected only with the HCW- and self-collected swabs, respectively (P = 0.41). The person collecting the swab in the self-collected arm, the order of collection, and prior swab collection training did not influence results. Among the 124 specimens that were positive by both collection methods, the amount of GAS DNA was higher in the self-collected versus the HCW-collected swabs (P = 0.008). Self-collected pharyngeal swabs provide a reliable alternative to HCW collection for detection of GAS and offer a strategy for improved health care delivery.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25502528      PMCID: PMC4298563          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02500-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  DNA from buccal swabs suitable for high-throughput SNP multiplex analysis.

Authors:  Gai L McMichael; Catherine S Gibson; Michael E O'Callaghan; Paul N Goldwater; Gustaaf A Dekker; Eric A Haan; Alastair H MacLennan
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2009-12

2.  Self-collection of vaginal swabs for the detection of Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis: opportunity to encourage sexually transmitted disease testing among adolescents.

Authors:  H C Wiesenfeld; D L Lowry; R P Heine; M A Krohn; H Bittner; K Kellinger; M Shultz; R L Sweet
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat?

Authors:  M H Ebell; M A Smith; H C Barry; K Ives; M Carey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Stanford T Shulman; Alan L Bisno; Herbert W Clegg; Michael A Gerber; Edward L Kaplan; Grace Lee; Judith M Martin; Chris Van Beneden
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Group a streptococcal diseases and their global burden.

Authors:  Anna P Ralph; Jonathan R Carapetis
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  Economic burden of adult pharyngitis: the payer's perspective.

Authors:  Alan R Salkind; Julie M Wright
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Comparison of LightCycler PCR, rapid antigen immunoassay, and culture for detection of group A streptococci from throat swabs.

Authors:  J R Uhl; S C Adamson; E A Vetter; C D Schleck; W S Harmsen; L K Iverson; P J Santrach; N K Henry; F R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Large-scale validation of the Centor and McIsaac scores to predict group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  Andrew M Fine; Victor Nizet; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-11

9.  Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing.

Authors:  Neelam Dhiman; Rita M Miller; Janet L Finley; Matthew D Sztajnkrycer; David M Nestler; Andy J Boggust; Sarah M Jenkins; Thomas F Smith; John W Wilson; Franklin R Cockerill; Bobbi S Pritt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Cheek swabs, SNP chips, and CNVs: assessing the quality of copy number variant calls generated with subject-collected mail-in buccal brush DNA samples on a high-density genotyping microarray.

Authors:  Stephen W Erickson; Stewart L MacLeod; Charlotte A Hobbs
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.103

View more
  12 in total

1.  Advances Afoot in Microbiology.

Authors:  Robin Patel; Brad S Karon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  New Developments in Clinical Bacteriology Laboratories.

Authors:  Robin Patel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Changing from Clinician-Collected to Self-Collected Throat Swabs for Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Screening among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Eric P F Chow; Catriona S Bradshaw; Deborah A Williamson; Shauna Hall; Marcus Y Chen; Tiffany R Phillips; Ria Fortune; Kate Maddaford; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Point-Counterpoint: A Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Streptococcus pyogenes Should Replace Antigen Detection and Culture for Detection of Bacterial Pharyngitis.

Authors:  Bobbi S Pritt; Robin Patel; Thomas J Kirn; Richard B Thomson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Upper Airway Swab Collection for Detection of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens by Individuals or Caregivers Compared to Health Care Workers.

Authors:  Ciara Harrison; Daniel E Lindholm; Andrew C Steer; Joshua Osowicki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Acceptability and Feasibility of Self-Collecting Biological Specimens for HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infection, and Adherence Testing Among High-Risk Populations (Project Caboodle!): Protocol for an Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Akshay Sharma; Rob Stephenson; Gregory Sallabank; Leland Merrill; Stephen Sullivan; Monica Gandhi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-05-02

7.  Self-collection: An appropriate alternative during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors:  Michael C Wehrhahn; Jennifer Robson; Suzanne Brown; Evan Bursle; Shane Byrne; David New; Smathi Chong; James P Newcombe; Terri Siversten; Narelle Hadlow
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Development of a Laboratory-safe and Low-cost Detection Protocol for SARS-CoV-2 of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Joungha Won; Solji Lee; Myungsun Park; Tai Young Kim; Mingu Gordon Park; Byung Yoon Choi; Dongwan Kim; Hyeshik Chang; V Narry Kim; C Justin Lee
Journal:  Exp Neurobiol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.261

9.  Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19.

Authors:  Robin Patel; Esther Babady; Elitza S Theel; Gregory A Storch; Benjamin A Pinsky; Kirsten St George; Tara C Smith; Stefano Bertuzzi
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 10.  SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a review of molecular diagnostic tools including sample collection and commercial response with associated advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Harikrishnan Jayamohan; Christopher J Lambert; Himanshu J Sant; Alexander Jafek; Dhruv Patel; Haidong Feng; Michael Beeman; Tawsif Mahmood; Ugochukwu Nze; Bruce K Gale
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.