William A Satariano1, Andrew E Scharlach2, David Lindeman3. 1. University of California, Berkeley, USA bills@berkeley.edu. 2. University of California, Berkeley, USA. 3. University of California, Berkeley, USA Center for Aging and Technology, Oakland, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the range of promising technologies (e.g., smart phones, remote monitoring devices) designed to enhance aging in place; identify challenges for implementation of those technologies; and recommend ways to improve access to technologies in older populations. METHOD: A narrative review of research, practice, and policies from multiple fields, including information science, gerontology, engineering, housing and social services, health care and public health. RESULTS: Despite a wide range of emerging and current technologies, there are significant challenges for implementation, including an uneven evidence base, economic barriers, and educational and ergonomic issues that adversely affect many older adults. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for future development and adoption include improving the evidence base through field-testing of "packages" of devices in diverse populations of older adults; development of innovative funding mechanisms involving multidisciplinary teams, older adults, and caregivers; and promotion of safety and security in the use of these technologies in older populations.
OBJECTIVE: To review the range of promising technologies (e.g., smart phones, remote monitoring devices) designed to enhance aging in place; identify challenges for implementation of those technologies; and recommend ways to improve access to technologies in older populations. METHOD: A narrative review of research, practice, and policies from multiple fields, including information science, gerontology, engineering, housing and social services, health care and public health. RESULTS: Despite a wide range of emerging and current technologies, there are significant challenges for implementation, including an uneven evidence base, economic barriers, and educational and ergonomic issues that adversely affect many older adults. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for future development and adoption include improving the evidence base through field-testing of "packages" of devices in diverse populations of older adults; development of innovative funding mechanisms involving multidisciplinary teams, older adults, and caregivers; and promotion of safety and security in the use of these technologies in older populations.
Authors: John A Batsis; Curtis L Petersen; Matthew M Clark; Summer B Cook; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Rima I Al-Nimr; Dawna Pidgeon; David Kotz; Todd A Mackenzie; Stephen J Bartels Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kristin E Lees; Barbara J Guthrie; Elizabeth L Henderson; Holly B Jimison; Carmen Sceppa; Misha Pavel; Christine Gordon; Terry Fulmer Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Gregory L Alexander; Andrew Georgiou; Kevin Doughty; Andrew Hornblow; Anne Livingstone; Michelle Dougherty; Stephen Jacobs; Malcolm J Fisk Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Lamiece Hassan; Caroline Swarbrick; Caroline Sanders; Angela Parker; Matt Machin; Mary P Tully; John Ainsworth Journal: Res Involv Engagem Date: 2017-08-01