| Literature DB >> 25502040 |
Sheng Sheng1, Sufang Feng1, Ling Meng1, Baoping Li2.
Abstract
Less attention has been paid to the parasitoid-host system in which the host occurs in considerably high density with a hierarchical patch structure in studies on time allocation strategies of parasitoids. This study used the parasitoid Meteorus pulchricornis (Wesmael) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the Oriental leafworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) as the parasitoids-host model system to investigate patch-leaving mechanisms as affected by the high-host density, hierarchical patch structure, and foraging behaviors on both former and current patches. The results showed that three out of eight covariates tested had significant effects on the patch-leaving tendency, including the host density, ovipositor insertion, and host rejection on the current patch. The parasitoid paid more visits to the patch with high-density hosts. While the patch with higher host densities decreased the leaving tendency, the spatial distribution of hosts examined had no effect on the leaving tendency. Both oviposition and host rejection decreased the patch-leaving tendency. The variables associated with the former patch, such as the host density and number of ovipositor insertions, however, did not have an effect on the leaving tendency. Our study suggested that M. pulchricornis females may use an incremental mechanism to exploit high-density patches to the fullest.Entities:
Keywords: behavioral mechanism; hierarchical patch structure; host density; host distribution; patch time allocation
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25502040 PMCID: PMC5633939 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Fig. 1.Variation in the spatial distribution of S. litura caterpillars with the development from the late first (A), mid-second (B) to third (C) stadium on soybean plants.
Covariates tested for having an effect on the patch leaving tendency
| Covariate | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Host density | The three broad categories of host density: 0, no host, the control; 1, low density from 1 egg mass; 2, high density from 2 egg masses (each egg mass contained ca 200 eggs). |
| 2. Host distribution | The spatial distribution of hosts, a categorical variable. 1, dense cluster on a leaf at the late first stadium; 2, moderately dense cluster on a few contiguous leaves; 3, spreading cluster on most leave of the plant. |
| 3. Sting | The total number of ovipositor insertions in the current patch, a numerical variable |
| 4. Host rejection | The total number of hosts rejected after touching with antennae, a numerical variable |
| 5. Re-sting | The number of hosts receiving ≥2 successive stings, suggesting superparasitism, a numerical variable |
| 6. Visit degree | The cumulative number of leaves visited in the current patch, a numerical variable |
| 7. Previous host density | See item 1 for the explanation. |
| 8. Previous sting | The total number of ovipositor insertions on the former patch, a numerical variable |
Estimated regression coefficient (β) of a Cox proportional hazard model for tested covariates that have a significant effect ( P < 0.05) on the patch-leaving tendency of Meteorus pulchricornis foraging
| Covariate | β | SE(β) | exp(β) |
|
| Effect on leaving tendency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host density | 27.06 (2) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Control | 0 | – | 1 | |||
| Low | −1.68 | 0.45 | 0.19 | ↓ | ||
| High | −2.08 | 0.44 | 0.12 | ↓ | ||
| Sting | −0.14 | 0.02 | 0.87 | 40.97 (1) | < 0.001 | ↓ |
| Host rejection | −0.14 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 24.80 (1) | < 0.001 | ↓ |
| Sting × Host rejection | 0.006 | 0.002 | 1.006 | 7.29 (1) | < 0.01 | ↑ |
Note: The treatment of three host density with empty was taken as a reference level. χ2 correspond to the likelihood ratio tests (α = 0.05).
Summary of covariates which were removed from the model selection procedure according to the likelihood ratio test
| Covariate |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Previous stings | 0.007 (1) | 0.93 |
| Previous host density | 1.11 (3) | 0.78 |
| Re-stings | 0.47 (1) | 0.49 |
| Visit degree | 2.05 (1) | 0.15 |
| Host distribution | 2.87 (2) | 0.24 |
Note: χ2 correspond to the likelihood ratio tests (α = 0.05)
Fig. 2.Cumulative leaving tendency (hazard functions) of M. pulchricornis on patches with empty (control, baseline hazard), low and high host densities.