BACKGROUND: The optimal penetration of antiretroviral agents into the central nervous system may be a balance between providing adequate drug exposure to inhibit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication while avoiding concentrations associated with neuronal toxicities. METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure of efavirenz and the metabolites 7-hydroxy (7OH) and 8-hydroxy (8OH) efavirenz were assessed after at least 12 weeks of therapy in HIV-infected subjects randomized to commence antiretroviral regimens containing efavirenz at either 400 mg or 600 mg once daily. RESULTS: Of 28 subjects (14 and 14 on efavirenz 400 mg and 600 mg, respectively), CSF HIV RNA was undetectable in all. Geometric mean CSF efavirenz, 7OH-, and 8OH-efavirenz concentrations (with 90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the 400-mg and 600-mg dosing groups were 16.5 (13-21) and 19.5 (15-25) ng/mL; 0.6 (.4-.9) and 0.6 (.4-1) ng/mL; and 5.1 (4.0-6.4) and 3.1 (2.1-4.4) ng/mL, respectively. Efavirenz concentration in CSF was >0.51 ng/mL (proposed CSF 50% maximal inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus) in all subjects, and 8OH-efavirenz concentration in CSF was >3.3 ng/mL (a proposed toxicity threshold) in 11 of 14 and 7 of 14 subjects randomized to the 400 mg and 600 mg doses of efavirenz, respectively. Whereas CSF efavirenz concentration was significantly associated with plasma concentration (P < .001) and cytochrome P450 2B6 genotype (CSF efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 0.56 [90% CI, .42-.74]), CSF 8OH-efavirenz concentration was not (P = .242 for association and CSF 8OH-efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 1.52 [90% CI, .97-2.36]). CONCLUSIONS: With both doses of efavirenz studied, CSF concentrations were considered adequate to inhibit HIV replication, although concentrations of 8OH-efavirenz were greater than those reportedly associated with neuronal toxicity. CSF exposure of 8OH-efavirenz was not dependent on plasma exposure and, as we postulate, may be subject to saturable pharmacokinetic effects. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01011413.
BACKGROUND: The optimal penetration of antiretroviral agents into the central nervous system may be a balance between providing adequate drug exposure to inhibit human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication while avoiding concentrations associated with neuronal toxicities. METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) exposure of efavirenz and the metabolites 7-hydroxy (7OH) and 8-hydroxy (8OH) efavirenz were assessed after at least 12 weeks of therapy in HIV-infected subjects randomized to commence antiretroviral regimens containing efavirenz at either 400 mg or 600 mg once daily. RESULTS: Of 28 subjects (14 and 14 on efavirenz 400 mg and 600 mg, respectively), CSF HIV RNA was undetectable in all. Geometric mean CSF efavirenz, 7OH-, and 8OH-efavirenz concentrations (with 90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for the 400-mg and 600-mg dosing groups were 16.5 (13-21) and 19.5 (15-25) ng/mL; 0.6 (.4-.9) and 0.6 (.4-1) ng/mL; and 5.1 (4.0-6.4) and 3.1 (2.1-4.4) ng/mL, respectively. Efavirenz concentration in CSF was >0.51 ng/mL (proposed CSF 50% maximal inhibitory concentration for wild-type virus) in all subjects, and 8OH-efavirenz concentration in CSF was >3.3 ng/mL (a proposed toxicity threshold) in 11 of 14 and 7 of 14 subjects randomized to the 400 mg and 600 mg doses of efavirenz, respectively. Whereas CSF efavirenz concentration was significantly associated with plasma concentration (P < .001) and cytochrome P450 2B6 genotype (CSF efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 0.56 [90% CI, .42-.74]), CSF 8OH-efavirenz concentration was not (P = .242 for association and CSF 8OH-efavirenz GG to GT/TT geometric mean ratio, 1.52 [90% CI, .97-2.36]). CONCLUSIONS: With both doses of efavirenz studied, CSF concentrations were considered adequate to inhibit HIV replication, although concentrations of 8OH-efavirenz were greater than those reportedly associated with neuronal toxicity. CSF exposure of 8OH-efavirenz was not dependent on plasma exposure and, as we postulate, may be subject to saturable pharmacokinetic effects. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01011413.
Authors: Eric H Decloedt; Phumla Z Sinxadi; Gert U van Zyl; Lubbe Wiesner; Saye Khoo; John A Joska; David W Haas; Gary Maartens Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Robert Gross; Scarlett L Bellamy; Bakgaki Ratshaa; Xiaoyan Han; Marijana Vujkovic; Richard Aplenc; Andrew P Steenhoff; Mosepele Mosepele; Ganesh Moorthy; Athena F Zuppa; Brian L Strom; Gregory P Bisson Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Uriel Sandkovsky; Anthony T Podany; Courtney V Fletcher; Andrew Owen; Angela Felton-Coleman; Lee C Winchester; Kevin Robertson; Susan Swindells Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Sam Nightingale; Tran Thi Hong Chau; Martin Fisher; Mark Nelson; Alan Winston; Laura Else; Daniel F Carr; Steven Taylor; Andrew Ustianowski; David Back; Munir Pirmohamed; Tom Solomon; Jeremy Farrar; M Estée Törok; Saye Khoo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: L Dickinson; J Amin; L Else; M Boffito; D Egan; A Owen; S Khoo; D Back; C Orrell; A Clarke; M Losso; P Phanuphak; D Carey; D A Cooper; S Emery; R Puls Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Natalia Mast; Peter Verwilst; Clayton J Wilkey; F Peter Guengerich; Irina A Pikuleva Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-11-03 Impact factor: 7.446