Hidekazu Uchiyama1. 1. Laboratory of Public Health, Department of Health Dietetics, Faculty of Health Promotional Sciences, Hamamatsu University, 1230 miyakodacho Kita-ku, Hamamatsu-Shi, Shizuoka-ken, 431-2102, Japan, uchi@hm.tokoha-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is Vibrio cholerae non-O1 existing in river. Bacteria are known to inhabit all kinds of environment. Vibrionaceae is widely distributed in environmental water. Vibrio spp. have been identified as a cause of toxicity in fish and shellfish. One condition affecting the survival of pathogenic microorganisms in environmental water is the salt concentration, and they have been reported to inhabit brackish water. However, V. cholerae non-O1 has also been detected in fresh water, and its properties suggest that it can survive in river water. METHODS: Sampling was performed 4 times at 4 points during a 5-month period from July to November at about 1-month intervals from the Sagami River in 1985. River water bacteria were identified, and V. cholera non-O1 isolated. I investigated the relationship between the bacterial flora in river water and the detection of V. cholerae non-O1. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the composition of bacterial flora with and without the isolation of V. cholerae non-O1 (Chi-square test) (χ(2) = 24.70 > 22.0 (p = 0.005), df = 8). A correlation between changes in the composition of the river water bacterial flora and detection of V. cholerae non-O1 was identified. CONCLUSION: Therefore, V. cholerae non-O1 exists in the river.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is Vibrio cholerae non-O1 existing in river. Bacteria are known to inhabit all kinds of environment. Vibrionaceae is widely distributed in environmental water. Vibrio spp. have been identified as a cause of toxicity in fish and shellfish. One condition affecting the survival of pathogenic microorganisms in environmental water is the salt concentration, and they have been reported to inhabit brackish water. However, V. cholerae non-O1 has also been detected in fresh water, and its properties suggest that it can survive in river water. METHODS: Sampling was performed 4 times at 4 points during a 5-month period from July to November at about 1-month intervals from the Sagami River in 1985. River water bacteria were identified, and V. choleranon-O1 isolated. I investigated the relationship between the bacterial flora in river water and the detection of V. cholerae non-O1. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the composition of bacterial flora with and without the isolation of V. cholerae non-O1 (Chi-square test) (χ(2) = 24.70 > 22.0 (p = 0.005), df = 8). A correlation between changes in the composition of the river water bacterial flora and detection of V. cholerae non-O1 was identified. CONCLUSION: Therefore, V. cholerae non-O1 exists in the river.
Authors: G B Nair; Y Oku; Y Takeda; A Ghosh; R K Ghosh; S Chattopadhyay; S C Pal; J B Kaper; T Takeda Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: R Wilson; S Lieb; A Roberts; S Stryker; H Janowski; R Gunn; B Davis; C F Riddle; T Barrett; J G Morris; P A Blake Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1981-08 Impact factor: 4.897