Literature DB >> 2550066

Analysis of the relative contributions of the nuclear Overhauser interproton distance restraints and the empirical energy function in the calculation of oligonucleotide structures using restrained molecular dynamics.

A M Gronenborn1, G M Clore.   

Abstract

The relative contributions of the interproton distance restraints derived from nuclear Overhauser enhancement measurements and of the empirical energy function in the determination of oligonucleotide structures by restrained molecular dynamics are investigated. The calculations are based on 102 intraresidue and 126 interresidue interproton distance restraints derived from short mixing time two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser enhancement data on the dodecamer 5'd(CGCGPATTCGCG)2 [Clore, G.M., Oschkinat, H., McLaughlin, L.W., Benseler, F., Scalfi Happ, C., Happ, E., & Gronenborn, A.M. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 4185-4197]. Eight interproton distance restraint lists were made up with errors ranging from -0.1/+0.2 to -1.2/+1.3 A for r less than 2.5 A and from -0.2/+0.3 to -1.3/+1.4 A for r greater than or equal to 2.5 A. These restraints were incorporated into the total energy function of the system in the form of square-well potentials with force constants set sufficiently high to ensure that the deviations between calculated distances and experimental restraints were very small (average interproton distance rms deviation of less than 0.06 A). For each data set, six calculations were carried out, three starting from classical A-DNA and three from classical B-DNA. The results show that structural changes occurring during the course of restrained molecular dynamics and the degree of structural convergence are determined by the interproton distance restraints. All the structures display similar small deviations from idealized geometry and have the same values for the nonbonding energy terms comprising van der Waals, electrostatic, and hydrogen-bonding components. Thus, the function of the empirical energy function is to maintain near perfect stereochemistry and nonbonded interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2550066     DOI: 10.1021/bi00440a039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

1.  N.m.r. determination of the solution conformation and dynamics of the A.G mismatch in the d(CGCAAATTGGCG)2 dodecamer.

Authors:  A N Lane; T C Jenkins; D J Brown; T Brown
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Nucleic acid helix structure determination from NMR proton chemical shifts.

Authors:  Ramon M van der Werf; Marco Tessari; Sybren S Wijmenga
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Solution Structure of a Nonpolar, Non-Hydrogen-Bonded Base Pair Surrogate in DNA.

Authors:  Kevin M Guckian; Thomas R Krugh; Eric T Kool
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2000-07-26       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Solution structure of a highly stable DNA duplex conjugated to a minor groove binder.

Authors:  S Kumar; M W Reed; H B Gamper; V V Gorn; E A Lukhtanov; M Foti; J West; R B Meyer; B I Schweitzer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Determination of the NMR solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  S Morikawa; K Ogata; A Sekikawa; A Sarai; S Ishii; Y Nishimura; H Nakamura
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Overall structure and sugar dynamics of a DNA dodecamer from homo- and heteronuclear dipolar couplings and 31P chemical shift anisotropy.

Authors:  Zhengrong Wu; Frank Delaglio; Nico Tjandra; Victor B Zhurkin; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.835

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.