Literature DB >> 25500020

Micro-electrophoresis: a noninvasive method of sperm selection based on membrane charge.

Luke Simon1, Kristin Murphy1, Kenneth I Aston1, Benjamin R Emery1, James M Hotaling1, Douglas T Carrell2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a technique with the potential of isolating genetically fit sperm for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment without compromising its structural or functional competence.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Fifty patients undergoing infertility diagnosis and 88 couples undergoing ART treatment. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Under an electric field, the percentage of positively charged sperm (PCS), negatively charged sperm (NCS), and neutrally charged sperm was determined for each ejaculate before and after density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and evaluated for sperm DNA damage, histone retention, and couples' ART outcomes. Subsequently, PCS, NCS, and neutrally charged sperm were selected using an intracytoplasmic sperm injection needle and directly analyzed for DNA damage. RESULT(S): There was a reduction in the NCS population (95.10% ± 0.94% vs. 54.48% ± 2.39%) and an increase in the PCS population (4.28% ± 0.58% vs. 42.52% ± 2.36%) after DGC. The DNA damage was inversely proportional to %NCS (r(2) = -0.242) and directly proportional to the %PCS (r(2) = 0.206). When sperm were picked according to their charge and directly analyzed, sperm DNA damage was lower in the NCS population (3.9% ± 1.5%) compared with control (17.3% ± 3.2%) and %PCS populations (27.8% ± 6.0%). The %NCS was positively associated with fertilization rate (r(2) = 0.469) and blastocyst development (r(2) = 0.308) and inversely associated with embryo arrest (r(2) = -0.253). Implantation rate and clinical pregnancies were higher in patient groups with increased NCS. CONCLUSION(S): Selection of NCS through micro-electrophoresis has the potential to isolate sperm relatively free of DNA damage to be used in ART.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART outcomes; histone retention; micro-electrophoresis; sperm DNA damage; sperm selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25500020     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm.

Authors:  Luke Simon; Kristin Murphy; Kenneth I Aston; Benjamin R Emery; James M Hotaling; Douglas T Carrell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Zeta Sperm Selection Improves Pregnancy Rate and Alters Sex Ratio in Male Factor Infertility Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Nasr Esfahani; Mohammad Reza Deemeh; Marziyeh Tavalaee; Mohammad Hadi Sekhavati; Hamid Gourabi
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Sperm selection in IVF: the long and winding road from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Moisa Lucia Pedrosa; Marcelo Horta Furtado; Márcia Cristina França Ferreira; Márcia Mendonça Carneiro
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 4.  Sperm Oxidative Stress during In Vitro Manipulation and Its Effects on Sperm Function and Embryo Development.

Authors:  Roberto Gualtieri; Guruprasad Kalthur; Vincenza Barbato; Salvatore Longobardi; Francesca Di Rella; Satish Kumar Adiga; Riccardo Talevi
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.