Eva Malacova1, Anna Kemp2, Roger Hart3, Khadra Jama-Alol4, David B Preen5. 1. Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Electronic address: eva.malacova@uwa.edu.au. 2. Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Electronic address: anna.kemp@uwa.edu.au. 3. School of Women's and Infants Health, The University of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, 374 Bagot Road, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia; Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, 25 Queenslea Drive, Claremont, WA 6010, Australia. Electronic address: roger.hart@uwa.edu.au. 4. Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Electronic address: khadra.jamaalol@uwa.edu.au. 5. Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Electronic address: david.preen@uwa.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) on live-delivery rates in women who had previously undergone tubal sterilization. STUDY DESIGN: We examined first IVF live deliveries for women aged 20-44 years at their first embryo transfer (ET) with history of hospital admission for tubal sterilization in Western Australia (WA). The ET cycles (n=178) were ascertained over the period of 1996 to 2010 using WA hospital records. A control group of subfertile women matched by age was randomly selected (n=178). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and life-table analysis to evaluate the cumulative live-delivery rates. RESULTS: An overall cumulative live-delivery rate in women who had undergone previous tubal sterilization (31%) was comparable to that of subfertile controls (34%) within the first 24 months. Younger women (aged 20-34 years) with previous sterilization (34%) were slightly more likely to deliver an IVF live baby than older women (aged 35-39 and 40-44 years) (33% and 22%, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=.449). CONCLUSION: Women who desire fertility after a tubal sterilization procedure and undergo IVF have rates of pregnancy similar to age-matched subfertile IVF control patients. IMPLICATIONS: In vitro fertilization success in women who had undergone previous tubal sterilization is similar to that of the subfertile controls and thus does not depend on past fertility. Age is the most important predictive factor in achieving pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization (IVF) on live-delivery rates in women who had previously undergone tubal sterilization. STUDY DESIGN: We examined first IVF live deliveries for women aged 20-44 years at their first embryo transfer (ET) with history of hospital admission for tubal sterilization in Western Australia (WA). The ET cycles (n=178) were ascertained over the period of 1996 to 2010 using WA hospital records. A control group of subfertile women matched by age was randomly selected (n=178). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and life-table analysis to evaluate the cumulative live-delivery rates. RESULTS: An overall cumulative live-delivery rate in women who had undergone previous tubal sterilization (31%) was comparable to that of subfertile controls (34%) within the first 24 months. Younger women (aged 20-34 years) with previous sterilization (34%) were slightly more likely to deliver an IVF live baby than older women (aged 35-39 and 40-44 years) (33% and 22%, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=.449). CONCLUSION: Women who desire fertility after a tubal sterilization procedure and undergo IVF have rates of pregnancy similar to age-matched subfertile IVF control patients. IMPLICATIONS: In vitro fertilization success in women who had undergone previous tubal sterilization is similar to that of the subfertile controls and thus does not depend on past fertility. Age is the most important predictive factor in achieving pregnancy.
Authors: Heather Hipp; Sara Crawford; Jennifer F Kawwass; Sheree L Boulet; David A Grainger; Dmitry M Kissin; Denise Jamieson Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Khadra A Jama-Alol; Alexandra P Bremner; Gavin Pereira; Louise M Stewart; Eva Malacova; Rachael Moorin; David B Preen Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2017-11-25 Impact factor: 2.809