Ronald E Shaffer1, Larry L Janssen2. 1. National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety Health, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: RShaffer@cdc.gov. 2. Larry Janssen Consulting, Stillwater, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An unbiased source of comparable respirator performance data would be helpful in setting up a hospital respiratory protection program. METHODS: The scientific literature was examined to assess the extent to which performance data (respirator fit, comfort and usability) from N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) models are available to assist with FFR model selection and procurement decisions. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified that met the search criteria for fit, whereas 5 studies met the criteria for comfort and usability. CONCLUSION: Analysis of these studies indicated that it is difficult to directly use the scientific literature to inform the FFR selection process because of differences in study populations, methodologies, and other factors. Although there does not appear to be a single best fitting FFR, studies demonstrate that fit testing programs can be designed to successfully fit nearly all workers with existing products. Comfort and usability are difficult to quantify. Among the studies found, no significant differences were noted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: An unbiased source of comparable respirator performance data would be helpful in setting up a hospital respiratory protection program. METHODS: The scientific literature was examined to assess the extent to which performance data (respirator fit, comfort and usability) from N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR) models are available to assist with FFR model selection and procurement decisions. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified that met the search criteria for fit, whereas 5 studies met the criteria for comfort and usability. CONCLUSION: Analysis of these studies indicated that it is difficult to directly use the scientific literature to inform the FFR selection process because of differences in study populations, methodologies, and other factors. Although there does not appear to be a single best fitting FFR, studies demonstrate that fit testing programs can be designed to successfully fit nearly all workers with existing products. Comfort and usability are difficult to quantify. Among the studies found, no significant differences were noted. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Filtering facepiece respirator; N95; Respirator fit testing
Authors: Christopher C Coffey; Robert B Lawrence; Donald L Campbell; Ziqing Zhuang; Catherine A Calvert; Paul A Jensen Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Kyungmin Jacob Cho; Tiina Reponen; Roy McKay; Alok Dwivedi; Atin Adhikari; Umesh Singh; Rakesh Shukla; Susan Jones; Gordon Jones; Sergey A Grinshpun Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Brian V Shenal; Lewis J Radonovich; Jing Cheng; Michael Hodgson; Bradley S Bender Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Stella Beckman; Barbara Materna; Suzi Goldmacher; Jennifer Zipprich; Maryann D'Alessandro; Debra Novak; Robert Harrison Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Maxim Milosevic; Raaj Kishore Biswas; Lesley Innes; Martin Ng; Ali Mehmet Darendeliler; Alice Wong; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 4.303