N D'Souza1, C D'Souza2, D Grant3, E Royston4, M Farouk5. 1. Wessex Deanery, Southern House, Otterbourne, Winchester, Hampshire, UK. Electronic address: mrnigeldsouza@gmail.com. 2. Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, UK. 3. Oxford Deanery, UK. 4. Wessex Deanery, Southern House, Otterbourne, Winchester, Hampshire, UK. 5. Department of General Surgery, Bucks NHS Healthcare Trust, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonography is a commonly used investigation in the UK for patients with right iliac fossa pain where the diagnosis of appendicitis is unclear. The published sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography is higher than the results observed by clinicians in every day practice. The aim of this study was to elucidate the real-world value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis, and its impact on negative appendicectomy rates (NAR). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre audit was conducted at three UK hospitals over a twelve month period in 2012. RESULTS: 573 patients underwent ultrasonography prior to appendicectomy. The appendix was not visualised in 45% of scans. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of appendicitis was 51.8% and 81.4%. The mean NAR was 26.7%, or 18.3% after a positive ultrasound scan. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice at UK centres, ultrasonography commonly does not visualise the appendix, and has a low sensitivity for appendicitis. To reduce the NAR, management options include a return to observation and serial examination, increased use of CT or a commitment to improving the performance of ultrasonography.
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasonography is a commonly used investigation in the UK for patients with right iliac fossa pain where the diagnosis of appendicitis is unclear. The published sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography is higher than the results observed by clinicians in every day practice. The aim of this study was to elucidate the real-world value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis, and its impact on negative appendicectomy rates (NAR). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre audit was conducted at three UK hospitals over a twelve month period in 2012. RESULTS: 573 patients underwent ultrasonography prior to appendicectomy. The appendix was not visualised in 45% of scans. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of appendicitis was 51.8% and 81.4%. The mean NAR was 26.7%, or 18.3% after a positive ultrasound scan. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice at UK centres, ultrasonography commonly does not visualise the appendix, and has a low sensitivity for appendicitis. To reduce the NAR, management options include a return to observation and serial examination, increased use of CT or a commitment to improving the performance of ultrasonography.
Authors: Michael D Repplinger; Joseph F Levy; Erica Peethumnongsin; Megan E Gussick; James E Svenson; Sean K Golden; William J Ehlenbach; Ryan P Westergaard; Scott B Reeder; David J Vanness Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Erden Erol Ünlüer; Rıfat Urnal; Utku Eser; Serkan Bilgin; Mehmet Hacıyanlı; Orhan Oyar; Haldun Akoğlu; Arif Karagöz Journal: World J Emerg Med Date: 2016
Authors: Camilla Gustafsson; Anna Lindelius; Staffan Törngren; Hans Järnbert-Pettersson; Anders Sondén Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 3.352