Literature DB >> 25499016

The effect of intra-abdominal pressure on sensory block level of single-shot spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: an observational study.

T Ozkan Seyhan1, M Orhan-Sungur2, B Basaran2, M Savran Karadeniz2, F Demircan2, Z Xu3, D I Sessler3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased intra-abdominal pressure in pregnancy is thought to affect intrathecal drug spread. However this assumption remains largely untested. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the association between intra-abdominal pressure and maximum sensory block level in parturients receiving spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
METHODS: Parturients having elective cesarean section with single-shot spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5mg were included. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured via a bladder catheter after establishing a T4 sensory block and at the end of surgery in the supine position with 10° left lateral tilt. We recorded demographic data, descriptive characteristics of pregnancy, self-reported weight gain and weight of the newborn. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated onset of sensory block, maximum sensory block, motor block, number of hypotensive episodes, fluid and ephedrine requirements, time to first analgesic request, time to one-point recovery of motor block and side effects.
RESULTS: The median value of the maximum sensory block level was T2 in 117 parturients. Median [interquartile range] pre-incision and postoperative intra-abdominal pressure were 13 [11-16] and 9 [6-10]mmHg respectively. No association was observed between maximum sensory block level and pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure (P=0.83). Weight was associated with pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure with an estimated odds ratio of 1.04 per kg (99.4% CI: 1.00-1.08). There was a moderate correlation between pre-incision and postoperative intra-abdominal pressure with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.67 (99.5% CI: 0.5-0.79). There was no association between pre-incision intra-abdominal pressure and secondary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In parturients, intra-abdominal pressure was not associated with spinal block spread, block onset time, recovery or side effects.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intra-abdominal pressure; Pregnancy; Spinal anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499016     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  4 in total

1.  Relationship between Abdominal Circumference and Incidence of Hypotension during Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Pattaraleeya Thomard; Sunthiti Morakul; Nichawan Wirachpisit; Wichai Ittichaikulthol; Chawika Pisitsak
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-18

2.  Onset Time of Spinal Anaesthesia in Pregnant Females in Knee-Chest Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Purnima Narasimhan; Heena Garg; Souvik Maitra; Devalina Goswami; Shailendra Kumar; Neisevilie Nisa; Riddhi Kundu; Puneet Khanna
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2022-02

3.  Intra-abdominal pressure, vertebral column length, and spread of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section: An observational study.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Ni; Ying Zhou; An-Cui Yong; Lu Wang; Qing-He Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Correlation between Weight of the Baby and the Level of Sensory Blockade in Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section: An Observational Study.

Authors:  K S Sushma; Ashwini H Ramaswamy; Safiya I Shaikh
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.