Literature DB >> 25498874

Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex.

Samuel A Taylor1, M Michael Khair2, Lawrence V Gulotta2, Andrew D Pearle2, Nikolas J Baret2, Ashley M Newman2, Christopher J Dy2, Stephen J O'Brien2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the limits of diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy and determine the prevalence and frequency of hidden extra-articular "bicipital tunnel" lesions among chronically symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens underwent diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy with percutaneous tagging of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) during maximal tendon excursion. The percentage of visualized LHBT was calculated relative to the distal margin of subscapularis tendon and the proximal margin of the pectoralis major tendon. Then, a retrospective review of 277 patients who underwent subdeltoid transfer of the LHBT to the conjoint tendon were retrospectively analyzed for lesions of the biceps-labral complex. Lesions were categorized by anatomic location (inside, junctional, or bicipital tunnel). Inside lesions were labral tears. Junctional lesions were LHBT tears visualized during glenohumeral arthroscopy. Bicipital tunnel lesions were extra-articular lesions hidden from view during standard glenohumeral arthroscopy.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of LHBT were visualized relative to the distal margin of the subscapularis tendon and only 55% relative to the proximal margin of the pectoralis major tendon. No portion of the LHBT inferior to the subscapularis tendon was visualized. Forty-seven percent of patients had hidden bicipital tunnel lesions. Scarring was most common and accounted for 48% of all such lesions. Thirty-seven percent of patients had multiple lesion locations. Forty-five percent of patients with junctional lesions also had hidden bicipital tunnel lesions. The only offending lesion was in the bicipital tunnel for 18% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy fails to fully evaluate the biceps-labral complex because it visualizes only 55% of the LHBT relative to the proximal margin of the pectoralis major tendon and did not identify extra-articular bicipital tunnel lesions present in 47% of chronically symptomatic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series and cadaveric study.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498874     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  22 in total

Review 1.  Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Injuries of the Biceps and Superior Labral Complex in Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Jonathan-James Eno; David W Altchek; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-06

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of tears and instability of proximal long head of biceps tendon: an evaluation of 100 shoulders compared with arthroscopy.

Authors:  Eduardo Baptista; Eduardo A Malavolta; Mauro E C Gracitelli; Daniel Alvarenga; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues; Arnaldo A Ferreira Neto; Nestor de Barros
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Diagnosis of long head of biceps tendinopathy in rotator cuff tear patients: correlation of imaging and arthroscopy data.

Authors:  Morgane Rol; Luc Favard; Julien Berhouet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Regional histologic differences in the long head of the biceps tendon following subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients with rotator cuff tears and SLAP lesions.

Authors:  Sergio A Glait; Siddharth Mahure; Cynthia A Loomis; Michael Cammer; Hien Pham; Andrew Feldman; Laith M Jazrawi; Eric J Strauss
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Adnan Saithna; Robert Jordan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  A practical, evidence-based, comprehensive (PEC) physical examination for diagnosing pathology of the long head of the biceps.

Authors:  Samuel Rosas; Michael K Krill; Kelms Amoo-Achampong; KiHyun Kwon; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 8.  Biceps tenodesis versus biceps tenotomy for biceps tendinitis without rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Syed Hassan; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-12-31

Review 9.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Injuries to the Biceps and Superior Labral Complex in Overhead Athletes.

Authors:  Jacob G Calcei; Venkat Boddapati; David W Altchek; Christopher L Camp; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

10.  Long Head of Biceps Tendon Management: a Survey of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

Authors:  Keith T Corpus; Grant H Garcia; Joseph N Liu; David M Dines; Stephen J O'Brien; Joshua S Dines; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-10-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.