Literature DB >> 25498873

Patient-centered outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears are not different in patients with normal, high, or low femoral version.

Fernando P Ferro1, Charles P Ho1, Karen K Briggs1, Marc J Philippon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether outcomes after hip arthroscopy were different based on femoral version.
METHODS: The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) based on clinical examination and/or imaging findings and preoperative measurement of femoral version by magnetic resonance imaging. For this study, the definition of FAI was a positive impingement sign, a positive flexion-abduction-external rotation examination finding, or radiographic signs of impingement. A query of a prospective data registry identified 180 patients who matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group 1 had version of less than 5° (n = 48), group 2 had version of 5° to 15° (n = 84), and group 3 had version greater than 15° (n = 48). The mean age of the patients was 35 years (range, 18 to 61 years).
RESULTS: On radiographic examination, the mean alpha angle for all patients' injured hips was 63° (range, 42° to 88°). The mean center-edge angle was 30° (range, 20° to 43°), and mean femoral version was 9.9° (range, -16° to 29°). There was no significant difference in age, alpha angle, or center-edge angle among the 3 version groups. A significant difference in psoas release procedures (psoas impingement) was seen with increasing femoral version. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 18 to 47 months). Patient-reported functional outcomes were not statistically different among the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy for labral tears and FAI were not different based on femoral version in this population. Although some differences were observed regarding intraoperative findings, these also did not result in differences in patient outcomes reported at a mean follow-up of 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498873     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Torsional deformities of the femur in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : Dynamic 3D impingement simulation can be helpful for the planning of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy].

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Florian Schmaranzer; Markus S Hanke; Christiane Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Femoral Derotation Osteotomy Technique for Excessive Femoral Anteversion.

Authors:  David E Hartigan; Itay Perets; John P Walsh; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-08-28

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients With Femoral Retroversion: A Matched Study to Patients With Normal Femoral Anteversion.

Authors:  David E Hartigan; Itay Perets; John P Walsh; Edwin O Chaharbakhshi; Leslie C Yuen; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-27

4.  Is Femoral Version Associated with Changes in Hip Muscle Strength in Females with Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Authors:  Adriano David Marostica; André Luiz Almeida Pizzolatti; Guilherme Pradi Adam; Daniel Codonho; Richard Prazeres Canella; Gerson Gandhi Ganev
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 5.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 6.  Is the Iliopsoas a Femoral Head Stabilizer? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Takashi Hirase; Jason Mallett; Lindsay E Barter; David Dong; Patrick C McCulloch; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-17

7.  Clinically Significant Outcome Improvement After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Severe Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Steven F DeFroda; Thomas D Alter; Blake M Bodendorfer; Alexander C Newhouse; Felipe S Bessa; Joel C Williams; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-06

8.  How frequent is absolute femoral retroversion in symptomatic patients with cam- and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Malin K Meier; Jelena Reche; Florian Schmaranzer; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Eduardo N Novais; Till D Lerch
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-07

Review 9.  Influence of Femoral Version on the Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement or Labral Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenghui Wang; Yaying Sun; Zheci Ding; Jinrong Lin; Zhiwen Luo; Jiwu Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 10.  Over one third of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement display femoral or acetabular version abnormalities.

Authors:  Zaki Arshad; Henry David Maughan; Karadi Hari Sunil Kumar; Matthew Pettit; Arvind Arora; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.