| Literature DB >> 25498596 |
Lina N Huang1, Justin Tan2, Jason Hitkari3, Michael H Dahan4.
Abstract
Infertility outcomes can be influenced by many factors. Although a number of treatments are offered, deciding which one to use first is a controversial topic. Although IVF may have superior efficacy in achieving a live birth with a reasonable safety profile, the availability of cheaper and less invasive treatments preclude its absolute use. For this reason, certain patient groups with 'good-prognosis' infertility are traditionally treated with less invasive treatments first. 'Good-prognosis' infertility may include unexplained infertility, mild male factor infertility, stage I or II endometriosis, unilateral tubal blockage and diminished ovarian reserve. Here, evidence behind the use of IVF as a first-line treatment is compared with its use as a last-resort option in women with 'good-prognosis' infertility.Entities:
Keywords: assisted reproductive treatment; first line; in-vitro fertilization; ovarian stimulation
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25498596 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828