Literature DB >> 25498568

A genomic algorithm for the molecular classification of common renal cortical neoplasms: development and validation.

Banumathy Gowrishankar1, Christopher G Przybycin2, Charles Ma1, Subhadra V Nandula1, Brian Rini3, Steven Campbell3, Eric Klein3, R S K Chaganti4, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi2, Jane Houldsworth5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate discrimination of benign oncocytoma and malignant renal cell carcinoma is useful for planning appropriate treatment strategies for patients with renal masses. Classification of renal neoplasms solely based on histopathology can be challenging, especially the distinction between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. In this study we develop and validate an algorithm based on genomic alterations for the classification of common renal neoplasms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using TCGA renal cell carcinoma copy number profiles and the published literature, a classification algorithm was developed and scoring criteria were established for the presence of each genomic marker. As validation, 191 surgically resected formalin fixed paraffin embedded renal neoplasms were blindly submitted to targeted array comparative genomic hybridization and classified according to the algorithm. CCND1 rearrangement was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
RESULTS: The optimal classification algorithm comprised 15 genomic markers, and involved loss of VHL, 3p21 and 8p, and chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10 and 17, and gain of 5qter, 16p, 17q and 20q, and chromosomes 3, 7 and 12. On histological rereview (leading to the exclusion of 3 specimens) and using histology as the gold standard, 58 of 62 (93%) clear cell, 51 of 56 (91%) papillary and 33 of 34 (97%) chromophobe renal cell carcinomas were classified correctly. Of the 36 oncocytoma specimens 33 were classified as oncocytoma (17 by array comparative genomic hybridization and 10 by array comparative genomic hybridization plus fluorescence in situ hybridization) or benign (6). Overall 93% diagnostic sensitivity and 97% specificity were achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical diagnostic setting the implementation of genome based molecular classification could serve as an ancillary assay to assist in the histological classification of common renal neoplasms.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA copy number variations; carcinoma; classification; comparative genomic hybridization; oncocytoma; renal; renal cell

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498568     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Genetic architecture of renal cell carcinoma: Do we have to know?

Authors:  Hakan Öztürk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Development of a Single Molecule Counting Assay to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cancer and Oncocytoma in Clinics.

Authors:  Khaled Bin Satter; Zach Ramsey; Paul M H Tran; Diane Hopkins; Gregory Bearden; Katherine P Richardson; Martha K Terris; Natasha M Savage; Sravan K Kavuri; Sharad Purohit
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Renal Cell Tumors: Understanding Their Molecular Pathological Epidemiology and the 2016 WHO Classification.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Update on Clinicopathological and Molecular Features.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.