Literature DB >> 25498407

Multisensory interactions in the depth plane in front and rear space: a review.

N Van der Stoep1, T C W Nijboer2, S Van der Stigchel3, C Spence4.   

Abstract

In this review, we evaluate the neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence relevant to the claim that multisensory information is processed differently depending on the region of space in which it happens to be presented. We discuss how the majority of studies of multisensory interactions in the depth plane that have been conducted to date have focused on visuotactile and audiotactile interactions in frontal peripersonal space and underline the importance of such multisensory interactions in defining peripersonal space. Based on our review of studies of multisensory interactions in depth, we question the extent to which peri- and extra-personal space (both frontal and rear) are characterized by differences in multisensory interactions (as evidenced by multisensory stimuli producing a different behavioral outcome as compared to unisensory stimulation). In addition to providing an overview of studies of multisensory interactions in different regions of space, our goal in writing this review has been to demonstrate that the various kinds of multisensory interactions that have been documented may follow very similar organizing principles. Multisensory interactions in depth that involve tactile stimuli are constrained by the fact that such stimuli typically need to contact the skin surface. Therefore, depth-related preferences of multisensory interactions involving touch can largely be explained in terms of their spatial alignment in depth and their alignment with the body. As yet, no such depth-related asymmetry has been observed in the case of audiovisual interactions. We therefore suggest that the spatial boundary of peripersonal space and the enhanced audiotactile and visuotactile interactions that occur in peripersonal space can be explained in terms of the particular spatial alignment of stimuli from different modalities with the body and that they likely reflect the result of prior multisensory experience.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Audition; Depth; Multisensory integration; Space; Spatial attention; Touch; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25498407     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  18 in total

1.  Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Kahan Modi; Mark T Wallace; Nathan Van der Stoep
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Echoic Sensory Substitution Information in a Single Obstacle Circumvention Task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Body part-centered and full body-centered peripersonal space representations.

Authors:  Andrea Serino; Jean-Paul Noel; Giulia Galli; Elisa Canzoneri; Patrick Marmaroli; Hervé Lissek; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Multisensory simultaneity judgment and proximity to the body.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Marta Lukowska; Mark Wallace; Andrea Serino
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A geometric model of defensive peripersonal space.

Authors:  R J Bufacchi; M Liang; L D Griffin; G D Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Audio Motor Training at the Foot Level Improves Space Representation.

Authors:  Elena Aggius-Vella; Claudio Campus; Sara Finocchietti; Monica Gori
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-18

7.  Audiovisual crossmodal cuing effects in front and rear space.

Authors:  Jae Lee; Charles Spence
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-30

Review 8.  Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angelica Maria Tinga; Johanna Maria Augusta Visser-Meily; Maarten Jeroen van der Smagt; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Raymond van Ee; Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Nijboer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 9.  Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22

10.  Modeling the Perception of Audiovisual Distance: Bayesian Causal Inference and Other Models.

Authors:  Catarina Mendonça; Pietro Mandelli; Ville Pulkki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.