Brahm K Solomon1, Keith G Wilson2, Peter R Henderson2, Patricia A Poulin3, John Kowal2, Douglas A McKim4. 1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address: brahm.solomon@gmail.com. 2. Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, Canada. 3. Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Catastrophizing about breathlessness may be related to disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but assessment options are limited. This study reports the initial validation of a 13-item Breathlessness Catastrophizing Scale (BCS). METHOD: Pulmonary rehabilitation inpatients completed spirometric, functional performance and questionnaire assessments at admission (N=242) and discharge (n=186). RESULTS: The BCS comprised a unifactorial scale that demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.96) and correlated with measures of anxiety sensitivity, depression, and self-efficacy, but not with performance on walk and stair-climbing tests. BCS scores improved robustly with rehabilitation, approaching a medium effect size (d=.43), and demonstrated a modest association with enhanced performance in a stair-climbing test of exercise tolerance. CONCLUSION: The BCS is a reliable measure of catastrophizing in severe COPD that has good convergent validity and sensitivity to change. Its association with functional performance requires further investigation. However, it appears that a high level of catastrophizing about breathlessness is not a barrier to functional improvement with inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: Catastrophizing about breathlessness may be related to disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but assessment options are limited. This study reports the initial validation of a 13-item Breathlessness Catastrophizing Scale (BCS). METHOD: Pulmonary rehabilitation inpatients completed spirometric, functional performance and questionnaire assessments at admission (N=242) and discharge (n=186). RESULTS: The BCS comprised a unifactorial scale that demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.96) and correlated with measures of anxiety sensitivity, depression, and self-efficacy, but not with performance on walk and stair-climbing tests. BCS scores improved robustly with rehabilitation, approaching a medium effect size (d=.43), and demonstrated a modest association with enhanced performance in a stair-climbing test of exercise tolerance. CONCLUSION: The BCS is a reliable measure of catastrophizing in severe COPD that has good convergent validity and sensitivity to change. Its association with functional performance requires further investigation. However, it appears that a high level of catastrophizing about breathlessness is not a barrier to functional improvement with inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.
Authors: Andreas von Leupoldt; Eline Mangelschots; Nils Georg Niederstrasser; Marijke Braeken; Thibo Billiet; Bea R H Van den Bergh Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Ada E M Bloem; Rémy L M Mostard; Naomi Stoot; Jan H Vercoulen; Jeannette B Peters; Daisy J A Janssen; Jan W H Custers; Martijn A Spruit Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Wolfgang Geidl; Jana Semrau; René Streber; Nicola Lehbert; Silke Wingart; Alexander Tallner; Michael Wittmann; Rupert Wagner; Konrad Schultz; Klaus Pfeifer Journal: Trials Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Thomas Janssens; Zora Van de Moortel; Wolfgang Geidl; Johannes Carl; Klaus Pfeifer; Nicola Lehbert; Michael Wittmann; Konrad Schultz; Andreas von Leupoldt Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 4.241