Literature DB >> 25497842

Gender differences in perceptions and self-reported driving behaviors among teenagers.

Gavin C Barr1, Kathleen E Kane1, Robert D Barraco2, Timarie Rayburg1, Lauren Demers1, Chadd K Kraus1, Marna Rayl Greenberg1, Valerie A Rupp1, Kimberly M Hamilton1, Bryan G Kane1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control reports that motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are the leading cause of injury and death among U.S. teenagers, and disproportionately affect males. Among preventable causes of MVCs involving teenage drivers, distracted driving continues to be a serious public health problem.
OBJECTIVES: To describe gender differences in teenage drivers' self-perceptions of safe driving behaviors, and self-reported risk behaviors and distractions while driving.
METHODS: We prospectively surveyed teenage drivers from four high schools in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Gender comparisons were made between self-reported perceptions and self-reported driving behaviors. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared testing were used in data analyses; significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-six high school teenage drivers completed surveys. Males (52%) and females (48%) were equally distributed; 32% of males reported that they were extremely safe drivers, whereas only 18% of females reported that they were extremely safe drivers (p < 0.001). Significantly more females (91%) compared to males (77%) reported always wearing their seatbelts (p < 0.001). Female drivers were more likely than male drivers to self-report that they always make their passengers wear a seat belt (76% vs. 63%, p < 0.001). A higher proportion of males reported using their cell phones while driving, compared to females (68% vs. 56%, p = 0.004), and 42% of males reported texting while driving, compared to 34% of females (p = 0.037).
CONCLUSION: Teenage male drivers perceive themselves to be safe drivers, but report engaging in more distracted driving and risky behaviors compared to females. These results suggest that there is an opportunity for gender-specific educational and injury prevention programs for teen drivers.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distracted driving; gender differences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497842     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  9 in total

1.  Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behaviour during Adolescence: The Influence of Personality and Gender.

Authors:  Renate L E P Reniers; Laura Murphy; Ashleigh Lin; Sandra Para Bartolomé; Stephen J Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Use of child restraint system and patterns of child transportation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammd Alsanea; Emad Masuadi; Tarek Hazwani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Trends in traumatic brain injury mortality in China, 2006-2013: A population-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Peixia Cheng; Peng Yin; Peishan Ning; Lijun Wang; Xunjie Cheng; Yunning Liu; David C Schwebel; Jiangmei Liu; Jinlei Qi; Guoqing Hu; Maigeng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Depressive and socially anxious symptoms, psychosocial maturity, and risk perception: Associations with risk-taking behaviour.

Authors:  Adam N Pailing; Renate L E P Reniers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  More aware, more protected: a cross-sectional study on road safety skills predicting the use of passive safety elements among Spanish teenagers.

Authors:  Sergio Useche; Francisco Alonso; Luis Montoro; Leandro Garrigós
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Predicting driving speed from psychological metrics in a virtual reality car driving simulation.

Authors:  Uijong Ju; John Williamson; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Analysis of road traffic injuries and casualties in China: a ten-year nationwide longitudinal study.

Authors:  Miao Qi; Xiuli Hu; Xiahong Li; Xue Wang; Xiuquan Shi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.061

8.  Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems.

Authors:  Huey-Wen Liang; Yaw-Huei Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trends and external causes of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury mortality in south China, 2014-2018: an ecological study.

Authors:  Xue-Yan Zheng; Qian Yi; Xiao-Jun Xu; Yan-Jun Xu; Yi Yang; Rui-Lin Meng; Shu-Li Ma; Si-Li Tang; Hao-Feng Xu; Ying-Shan Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.