Literature DB >> 25497766

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in auto-immune hemolytic anemia: A meta-analysis of 21 studies.

Quitterie Reynaud1, Isabelle Durieu2, Marine Dutertre1, Stanislas Ledochowski3, Stéphane Durupt1, Anne-Sophie Michallet4, Denis Vital-Durand1, Jean-Christophe Lega2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the response to rituximab (RTX) treatment in auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) patients.
METHODS: Studies were selected from MEDLINE up to March 2014. Two investigators independently extracted data on study design, patient characteristics, clinical features (AIHA type, disease duration, previous treatments), dose-schedule of rituximab, duration of treatment follow-up, and toxicities. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were evaluated to determine RTX efficacy and toxicity by calculating the weighted mean proportion with fixed or random-effects models in case of heterogeneity (p<0.1 or I(2)>50%).
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies encompassing 409 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The characteristics of the entire analyzed cohort reported were as follows: mean male proportion: 43%, mean age: 50 years, splenectomized patients range: 0-50%. Warm AIHA, primary AIHA and adults were mostly represented. With the random-effect model, the overall response rate (ORR) was 73% (95% CI 64-81%, 20 studies encompassing 402 patients). CR rate was 37% (95% CI 26-49%, 20 studies including 397 patients). The ORRs were close to 70% for warm AIHA (79%, 95% CI 60-90%, 11 studies, 154 patients), primary AIHA (67%, 95% CI 49-81%, 10 studies, 161 patients), and secondary AIHA (72%, 95% CI 60-82%, 8 studies, 66 patients). The ORR was 57% (95% CI 47-66%, 6 studies, 109 patients) for cold agglutinin disease (CAD). The CR rate was 42% (95% CI 27-58%, 11 studies, 154 patients) for warm AHAI, 32% (95% CI 17-51%, 11 studies, 176 patients) for primary AIHA, 46% (95% CI 30-62%, 9 studies, 87 patients) for secondary AIHA and only 21% (95% CI 6-51%, 7 studies, 118 patients) for CAD. Definitive response rates were evaluated during follow-up. CR rate was the highest within 2 to 4 months after RTX (13 studies, 203 patients, CR=70% [57-80%]). As for toxicities, 38 adverse events in 364 patients were noted (14% (95% CI 9-21%)). Sixteen events were infusion-linked side effects, mostly chills and fever, whereas twenty-two were severe. Only one opportunistic Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was reported. Seventeen patients out of 364 (4.6%) died during follow-up. In univariate mixed-effect meta-regressions, ORR and CR were significantly associated with warm AIHA (p=0.002) and mean age (p<0.001), and marginally associated with disease type (p=0.06 and 0.005, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab seems to be a safe and effective therapy for AIHA in this meta-analysis of observational studies. The authors suggest that it could be used at an earlier point in therapy, before more toxic immunosuppressive drugs, or in place of splenectomy in some cases.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoimmune hemolytic anemia; Cold agglutinin disease; Complete response; Overall response rate; Rituximab; Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497766     DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmun Rev        ISSN: 1568-9972            Impact factor:   9.754


  30 in total

Review 1.  Autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Anita Hill; Quentin A Hill
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Defining autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a systematic review of the terminology used for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Quentin A Hill; Anita Hill; Sigbjørn Berentsen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-25

3.  Cold agglutinin disease burden: a longitudinal analysis of anemia, medications, transfusions, and health care utilization.

Authors:  Megan Mullins; Xiaohui Jiang; Lauren C Bylsma; Jon P Fryzek; Heidi Reichert; Evan C Chen; Shivaani Kummar; Adam Rosenthal
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-05-19

Review 4.  Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; David Ferreira; Emma Paige; Craig Gedye; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  A Retrospective Study on Infusion-Related Reactions to Rituximab in a Heterogeneous Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Clément Legeay; Henrique Bittencourt; Elie Haddad; Laurence Spiesser-Robelet; Valérie Thépot-Seegers; Roxane Therrien
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Theodosia A Kalfa
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

7.  Efficacy and steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune cytopenia.

Authors:  Ruoxi Zhang; Miao Chen; Chen Yang; Bing Han
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 8.  Development of New Drugs for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia.

Authors:  Zhengrui Xiao; Irina Murakhovskaya
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.525

9.  Probability of remaining in unsustained complete remission after steroid therapy withdrawal in patients with primary warm-antibody reactive autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Johanna Kulpa; Cathrin Skrabs; Ralph Simanek; Peter Valent; Simon Panzer; Klaus Lechner; Christian Sillaber; Ulrich Jäger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Disease-modifying treatments for primary autoimmune haemolytic anaemia.

Authors:  Anthony Pak-Yin Liu; Daniel Kl Cheuk
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.