Literature DB >> 25497714

Factors associated with not receiving homecare, end-of-life homecare, or early homecare referral among cancer decedents: A population-based cohort study.

Daryl Bainbridge1, Hsien Seow2, Jonathan Sussman3, Gregory Pond4, Lisa Barbera5.   

Abstract

Publicly funded homecare has been shown to reduce acute care use and improve quality of life for those nearing end-of-life (EOL). Yet despite the known benefits of homecare, many EOL cancer patients never receive these services. We used administrative data on all cancer decedents in Ontario, Canada in 2006 to determine predictive factors of not receiving homecare, not receiving EOL homecare, and late initiation of EOL homecare. 22,262 decedents met the eligibly criteria, 25% of whom never received homecare in the last six months of life. A logistic regression found that cancer disease site, having a comorbidity (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2), region of residence, shorter cancer survival (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.8-2.4), being male (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3), lower income (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08), older age (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05), and less prior emergency department use were significant factors associated with not receiving homecare (p<0.001). Individuals with hematological cancer (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.3-1.8) were less likely to receive homecare in their final months. Some of these covariates also predicted not receiving EOL homecare and late referral to these services (p<0.05). The systematic differences in homecare use that we identified can help to guide strategies for improving access to these important services.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; End-of-life; Equality; Health care access; Homecare

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497714     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  6 in total

1.  Acute care hospitalization near the end of life for cancer patients who die in hospital in Canada.

Authors:  K DeCaria; D Dudgeon; E Green; R Shaw Moxam; R Rahal; J Niu; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  A Review of the Essential Components of Quality Palliative Care in the Home.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Daryl Bainbridge
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Resource use in the last three months of life by lung cancer patients in southern Ontario.

Authors:  Y Wang; A Van Dam; M Slaven; K J Ellis; J R Goffin; R A Juergens; P M Ellis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Conceptualizing and Counting Discretionary Utilization in the Final 100 Days of Life: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Validation of a modified VOICES survey to measure end-of-life care quality: the CaregiverVoice survey.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Daryl Bainbridge; Melissa Brouwers; Gregory Pond; John Cairney
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Access to Palliative Care for Cancer Patients Living in a Northern and Rural Environment in Ontario, Canada: The Effects of Geographic Region and Rurality on End-of-Life Care in a Population-Based Decedent Cancer Cohort.

Authors:  Michael Sc Conlon; Joseph M Caswell; Stacey A Santi; Barbara Ballantyne; Margaret L Meigs; Andrew Knight; Craig C Earle; Mark Hartman
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.